Jump to content

With Constant Roster Shuffling, Are Orioles Hurting Kevin Gausman?


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

I don't just want to argue. Frankly if I was looking for a quality argument I wouldn't be bothering with you.

I just want you to admit that your earlier statement was false.

Gausman had no realistic chance to make the rotation out of Spring Training.

No one but Buck or DD knows what chance ("realistic", 10%, 25% ??) Gasman had of making the starting rotation out of Spring Training so my statement cannot be defined as True/False, it is just speculation.

For all I/we know DD could have been very close to trading Norris and thus Gausman would have been the #5 starter. Someone could have been injured (very realistic I think) and Gausman would have been the 5th starter.

I don't know what Buck/DD used to make their decision, but hindsight indicates that their preference is for the veteran with a considerable ML track record so I guess your argument is that he had no "realistic" chance and no one should have wasted their time speculating, but as I don't meet with DD/Buck so for me it is all SPECULATION.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't the reality that he has battled injuries after a very ineffective spring training when he didn't make a case to be in the starting rotation?

I hope he gets his chance for the final 3 months, and I hope he is good but he definitely isn't a lock to be a TOR starter.

How did he not make a case? It is hard to make a case when you will only be an injury replacement.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did he need to have his innings managed?

Do you think he was a real threat to pitch over 200 innings this year?

Folks act like he only pitched 70 innings last year.

I hear you. And maybe I'm making too many assumptions. Gausman pitched 113 innings last year. According to the regiment most ML organizations are using, and Rick Peterson is a proponent, you should only pitch a young pitcher 25 or 30 innings more than the previous season. That would put him at 143 max this year. Plus, I think the O's mayhave been thinking about 3 rounds of playoffs. Anyway, I do think they were managing him very carefully earlier in the year and I surmise it was because the organization is worried about his innings.

Source: "Peterson believed that as in most training disciplines, you increase workload gradually. He preferred not to increase a young pitcher's innings by more than 25 or 30 per year." (http://www.si.com/mlb/2015/02/03/year-after-effect-madison-bumgarner-yordano-ventura)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear you. And maybe I'm making too many assumptions. Gausman pitched 113 innings last year. According to the regiment most ML organizations are using, and Rick Peterson is a proponent, you should only pitch a young pitcher 25 or 30 innings more than the previous season. That would put him at 143 max this year. Plus, I think the O's mayhave been thinking about 3 rounds of playoffs. Anyway, I do think they were managing him very carefully earlier in the year and I surmise it was because the organization is worried about his innings.

Source: "Peterson believed that as in most training disciplines, you increase workload gradually. He preferred not to increase a young pitcher's innings by more than 25 or 30 per year." (http://www.si.com/mlb/2015/02/03/year-after-effect-madison-bumgarner-yordano-ventura)

Gausman pitched more then 113 innings last year.

2014 MLB regular season 113

2014 MLB playoffs 8

2014 MiLB regular season 45.1

Total innings pitched- 166.1

He should be good for 190 easy.

Not sure why everyone (not just you) forgets he pitched in the minors last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman pitched more then 113 innings last year.

2014 MLB regular season 113

2014 MLB playoffs 8

2014 MiLB regular season 45.1

Total innings pitched- 166.1

He should be good for 190 easy.

Not sure why everyone (not just you) forgets he pitched in the minors last year.

Exactly. And if Gausman's max innings are 196 then the O's had to manage his innings. If he would have got 33 starts his innings could have been around 200. Then their is the playoffs. If he is one of the best three starters he could be between 8-30 innings in the playoffs. Bumgarner pitched 52 innings in the playoffs last year.

So the O's started April managing his innings and then on May 6th he goes on the DL with right shoulder tendinitis.

I don't think anyone knows what Gausman will do the 2nd half, but Norris and Tillman have set the bar pretty low.

As far as Gausman being a #1. At 24 there is a lot of baseball yet to play and Wallace has developed pitchers with very good stuff into aces before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. And if Gausman's max innings are 196 then the O's had to manage his innings. If he would have got 33 starts his innings could have been around 200. Then their is the playoffs. If he is one of the best three starters he could be between 8-30 innings in the playoffs. Bumgarner pitched 52 innings in the playoffs last year.

So the O's started April managing his innings and then on May 6th he goes on the DL with right shoulder tendinitis.

I don't think anyone knows what Gausman will do the 2nd half, but Norris and Tillman have set the bar pretty low.

As far as Gausman being a #1. At 24 there is a lot of baseball yet to play and Wallace has developed pitchers with very good stuff into aces before.

How often in the last decade has an Oriole starter exceeded 196 innings?

Of course if it did look like Gausman was closing in on a dangerous total of innings it would be simplicity itself to skip him a start, or move him back a day after off days, or pull him early if there is a big lead, and carve off the 10-20 innings he might need in a best case scenario (goes deep into games + playoffs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often in the last decade has an Oriole starter exceeded 196 innings?

Of course if it did look like Gausman was closing in on a dangerous total of innings it would be simplicity itself to skip him a start, or move him back a day after off days, or pull him early if there is a big lead, and carve off the 10-20 innings he might need in a best case scenario (goes deep into games + playoffs).

Chris Tillman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Tillman?

Tillman has.

Guthrie.

DCab in '07.

Bedard hit 196.1 in '06. (I think we would be OK with that for Gausman).

Lopez and Chen in '05.

Chen has once if you include the playoffs.

So basically once a season.

And it has gone down since Buck showed up, despite the pitching being better.

I think it is a pretty moderate risk that could have been handled easily during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often in the last decade has an Oriole starter exceeded 196 innings?

Of course if it did look like Gausman was closing in on a dangerous total of innings it would be simplicity itself to skip him a start, or move him back a day after off days, or pull him early if there is a big lead, and carve off the 10-20 innings he might need in a best case scenario (goes deep into games + playoffs).

If Gausman is pitching well in the tight pennant race, Sept is not when to manage his innings. April is a better time to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gausman is pitching well in the tight pennant race, Sept is not when to manage his innings. April is a better time to do that.

No. July, right around the all star break, is the time to do it.

By then you should have a gauge on if it would actually be an issue.

It isn't as if you would have to shed 30 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...