Barnaby Graves Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 Is there a reason people don't refer directly to games back and instead use games in the loss column? I don't understand this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 Is there a reason people don't refer directly to games back and instead use games in the loss column? I don't understand this. Because a team can always theoretically win out. The ultimate determining factor is the number of losses since that is a set total. That help? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crissfan172 Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 Because a team can always theoretically win out. The ultimate determining factor is the number of losses since that is a set total.That help? Exactly. You can't un-lose games to catch up on your own, but you can always win more if you've played less games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnaby Graves Posted June 28, 2015 Author Share Posted June 28, 2015 Because a team can always theoretically win out. The ultimate determining factor is the number of losses since that is a set total.That help? I thought that was kind of the reason but it doesn't seem particularly useful unless there's very few games left. And even then I'd probably use E numbers. Not that it really matters honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.