Jump to content

Schmuck "Os primed for quiet trade deadline"


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Some team would take a chance on Bundy thinking he could be their future ace.

Sure, they may take him but not for anything of value. No GM is going to trade a solid major league player for a guy who has had multiple major shoulder injuries and has barely been able to pitch the last 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to not realize that, in addition to his $4 million bonus, Bundy has been receiving a salary of $1.245 million a year. Any team that trades for him will pay him more than a million dollars next season with no assurance that he will even be able to throw a baseball. Even if he can pitch, he will have to remain in the majors all season, where he would be an untested reliever. If he ever starts a game in the big leagues, it may not be until 2017.

What could he possibly bring in return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now is not the time to trade Bundy. The O's would by selling him at his lowest possible value. I could see them standing pat and trying to fill their needs from within the organization. Although, there's a chance they could trade Norris to a team who needs a number five starter. Houston? They would need to eat some dollars though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now is not the time to trade Bundy. The O's would by selling him at his lowest possible value. I could see them standing pat and trying to fill their needs from within the organization. Although, there's a chance they could trade Norris to a team who needs a number five starter. Houston? They would need to eat some dollars though.

Eating money to deal Norris would be better than what they are eating now by pitching him. And even if he turns it around, he's not all that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to not realize that, in addition to his $4 million bonus, Bundy has been receiving a salary of $1.245 million a year. Any team that trades for him will pay him more than a million dollars next season with no assurance that he will even be able to throw a baseball. Even if he can pitch, he will have to remain in the majors all season, where he would be an untested reliever. If he ever starts a game in the big leagues, it may not be until 2017.

What could he possibly bring in return?

That is incorrect. The contract you are referring to runs from 2011-2015.

Not that paying him 1.245M is much different then paying 550K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, they may take him but not for anything of value. No GM is going to trade a solid major league player for a guy who has had multiple major shoulder injuries and has barely been able to pitch the last 3 years.

Pretty sure it has only been one shoulder injury. Last year his season ended with an injury to his latissimus dorsi, which is a muscle in the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eating money to deal Norris would be better than what they are eating now by pitching him. And even if he turns it around, he's not all that good.

But would we get anything of value for Norris? I don't see anyone trotting him out, even for free. He has been an absolute disaster all year. Then again, we get nothing if we just outright release him.

But I absolutely don't want to trade a young prospect for some late inning rental reliever. I think we're going to rue the day we traded E-Rod for Andrew Miller. We got absolutely fleeced in that deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But would we get anything of value for Norris? I don't see anyone trotting him out, even for free. He has been an absolute disaster all year. Then again, we get nothing if we just outright release him.

But I absolutely don't want to trade a young prospect for some late inning rental reliever. I think we're going to rue the day we traded E-Rod for Andrew Miller. We got absolutely fleeced in that deal.

With his impending free agency I agree that he doesn't seem like a good choice to take a flyer on. Unless you could get him on a MiLB deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But would we get anything of value for Norris? I don't see anyone trotting him out, even for free. He has been an absolute disaster all year. Then again, we get nothing if we just outright release him.

But I absolutely don't want to trade a young prospect for some late inning rental reliever. I think we're going to rue the day we traded E-Rod for Andrew Miller. We got absolutely fleeced in that deal.

If we trade Norris and cash for a can of beans we get a roster spot for someone else (TJ, Wilson, Givens).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you limit yourself to one avenue for bringing in players to stock your minor leagues, you don't typically have a lot to trade at the deadline. Especially, when you have a history of overpaying.

One trade is a history of overpaying?

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is incorrect. The contract you are referring to runs from 2011-2015.

Not that paying him 1.245M is much different then paying 550K.

True. But I don't think he can be cut to 550k. He can only be cut a certain percentage and it will be a tad under a million he makes.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter is dead wrong on this. The Orioles will be very active this year at the deadline. Dan has already said that they will. The last two weeks should make it very clear that the Orioles need some more players if they are going to reach the playoffs. Every one except Gausman and Wilson should be on the table to trade.

I can understand Gausman but why Wilson? He isn't a top prospect and doesn't profile as well as a bullpen arm.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I had such a crush on Nena in 1983-but I'm thinking  more Peter Pan?              
    • Suites and corporate partnerships have always been a massive part. They need those partnerships, suite sales, etc…always have.
    • In all the interviews with the front office folks, nothing makes me think they are tossing things out the window because of an organizational approach. Like Frobby said, approach hasn't change between the first half of the year and today, and I do not think the level of O's analytics is going to ignore obvious things like that. These are just not going to be things they haven't thought about before. I do worry some about defensive fundamentals which have been lacking since the Bobby Dickerson days, though I think that has nothing to do with analytics (which is more about positioning) and more to do with the fact that Dickerson was very good at his job and whoever is doing that work now is not as good.
    • I think one the best things that Elias brought to the team is having everyone on the same page.    The GM, Manager, Coaches both majors and minors leagues, the  players and the scouts.    That was  not where the O's were before Elias.   I think there is a real benefit to that. I think the problems with the O's can be summed up in a few words. 1) Injuries.    2) Breaking in rookies.   3) Fatigue  4)Pitchers not holding runners I think its a waste  of time to point out how many pitchers the O's have lost to a group on the OH.  Everyone knows.   And they know the pitching would be much better with all the O's pitchers healthy. Losing Westburg hurt the team on both sides the ball.  Gunnar has play 142 of the 144 games. 140 of those were at SS.   If Mateo was healthy during the dog days of summer would Gunnar have gotten a few days at DH that helped him get some rest?     You can say a lot of things about Hays but when he was in left the ball consistently and accurately was on target to 2nd base.   And the other team knew it and often did not run.  Cowser has a strong arm but the accuracy is a work in progress.   That is what happens when rookies are developed in the majors.     Holliday has the same rookie problem.  It will get better but it does affect the team, The offense is 2nd in the majors.   But what we are seeing in the 2nd half has a lot to do with fatigue. Both  Burnes and Kimbrel concentrate more on getting the hitters out and little on holding the runners.   And the other team takes advantage. For me looking at whether the current analytics based approach could use more old school in not really the point.    Any problems the O's have are more: 1) Injuries.    2) Breaking in rookies.   3) Fatigue  4) Pitchers not holding runners
    • It kind of burns me that the Rangers sandwiched a World Series win between two seasons when they were not even close to contention (and possibly below .500 in both).   Even the year they won, they weren't that good.   They just got on a heater when it mattered most.   
    • OHearn is playing too much though. His numbers since Aug 1 aren’t good.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...