Jump to content

OFFNY

Recommended Posts

It is pretty clear that Paredes is overmatched tonight. I was kind of surprised Buck tried him at lead-off tonight.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Paredes wouldn't have been my choice. RH or not, Reimold would be a better chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 420
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Dare I say it without jinxing him... This is the second stellar outing for Chris in a row.

I think if he's back to his old self and we can get something productive out of our corner outfielders that we could get back in the race. I know that's not the popular opinion, but I'm still drinking the kool-aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paredes was hitting ok but into bad luck IMO until a few games ago. The last couple games he looks bad again. I agree that he has a lot of body movement forward in his swing along with excess head and bat movement when he is going bad. I think it is controllable.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I agree I don't want him in everyday but I think he can hit .275 with doubles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching this team is just so depressing. Tillman pitching well but we can't get any runs and will likely find a way to screw it up.

We've scored more runs than Tampa Bay has, both in this game and for the season. So chin-up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason for the July offensive swoon? Parmelee, Snider, Reimold, Wieters, and Lough. They are a combined 32-191 (.167 BA) in the last 30 days with a BB% of 4.9, a K% of 34%, and just 13 XBH. Simply put they've been terrible. If the team is going to buy, they definitely need to get rid of Parmelee, move Davis to 1B, and get another outfielder. That's an easy solution and a huge upgrade right there.

Also, unless Wieters starts to hit better, Caleb needs to play at least every other game. He's been better offensively and defensively this season.

Joseph is below league average for CS% at 28%, not by much, but he isn't a clear cut choice over Wieters defensively. His pitch calling isn't great and the framing numbers have even come back to Earth. Wieters is better at blocking.

He'll be a suitable replacement next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paredes was hitting ok but into bad luck IMO until a few games ago. The last couple games he looks bad again. I agree that he has a lot of body movement forward in his swing along with excess head and bat movement when he is going bad. I think it is controllable.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Lay your mouse pointer on John's head. It's not perfect but it's John freaking Daly!

[video=youtube;R0kOjCfhf4o]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
    • Trumbo was a DH impersonating a fielder, Santander is just a very poor fielder. It's not a perfect comp (is there really even such a thing?) but he is an absolutely relevant comp for this team in this situation. He is the poster child for why taking the draft pick and moving on is the right choice. And Santander is still a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier.
    • To this end I feel like we always had a pretty short leash with him. From the first three starts as an oriole to the yo-yo-ing this year. I would have preferred we just left him in the #5 starter role and see what happened. And maybe he’ll get that opportunity elsewhere like you said, whereas here it always seemed like his role was changing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...