Jump to content

Orioles trade Davies for Parra. Your verdict?


PaulFolk

Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?

    • I approve. A small price to pay to fix the O's OF hole with a quality veteran.
    • I disapprove. The O's gave up up a pitching prospect for a rental who won't move the needle.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Resigning him has little to do with the trade. There's no expectation of resigning him, and even if they did it would be at a value quite similar to what he'd get on the market in a few months. The only benefit I see is that they avoid a situation where the Brewers could have given him a QO and costing the O's a pick. So you could argue that they traded Davies for a) two months of Parra, b) the value of a compensatory draft pick ($7M?) and c) a few months of exclusive negotiation. But that's only if he's resigned - if he's not its just two months of Parra.

The O's get a compensatory pick if Parra is signed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Gerardo Parra a lot. He is a complete player. Very good defensively with a rocket for an arm. Useful offensive player with speed and some pop in the bat. He is exactly the kind of guy that I would like to have for the next several years holding down a corner outfield position. But we needed a good bit more than just Parra for this year, and this year is all we have him for. So, I am pretty Meh on this trade. If we sign Parra to a deal this offseason I will give the trade a thumbs up. If we do not, I will give it a thumbs down.

Why do folks keep tying the grade of this trade to whether we extend Parra.

We could have kept Davies and signed Parra in the offseason. Having him on the team now gives almost no advantage to signing him to a contract. He is still just one of many FA's that we can pursue.

The trade was bad an almost desperate act by a GM who has done nothing to better his team in the last 12 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do folks keep tying the grade of this trade to whether we extend Parra.

We could have kept Davies and signed Parra in the offseason. Having him on the team now gives almost no advantage to signing him to a contract. He is still just one of many FA's that we can pursue.

The trade was bad an almost desperate act by a GM who has done nothing to better his team in the last 12 months.

If it makes anyone feel better, Davies got pounded in his AAA start last night, 5 ER and 11 baserunners in 4 IP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes anyone feel better, Davies got pounded in his AAA start last night, 5 ER and 11 baserunners in 4 IP.

It does not. I have watched him plenty as I did Eduardo. I think they will both have MLB careers. An extension of a pending FA does nothing to help in the evaluation of a trade.

Parra was acquired because our team lacked outfield defense and consistency and OBP which could have easily been rectified by offering Nick Markakis 45 million. We lost no pick or asset either way.

I would have enjoyed seeing Davies progress with us. Eduardo appears to be a pitcher who could have filled the void Chen will leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no they don't. What I'm saying is they'd lose a pick if they didn't trade for Parra, the Brewers kept him and QO'd him, and then the O's signed Parra in the offseason. When a player is traded in midseason there's no option for a QO/compensatory pick.

I would be surprised if the Brewers offered him a QO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if the Brewers offered him a QO.

It's hard to tell. If they thought his defense was solid and his hitting spike sticky then maybe. But it's probably more murky than that. I really don't know what to think with the guy - I've barely seen him play, don't trust my subjective judgment at all, and his metrics are almost random.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So would I. He is making $6.3 mm in his final year of arbitration eligibility. Even after a career year, he's probably not going to get much more than 3 years, $25-30 mm on the open market.

On the other hand, there's the fact that the players and their agents are very much against QOs, the compensatory pick is enticing, and nobody is ever hamstrung by a one-year deal. Right now I wouldn't hesitate for a minute putting the QO on Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no they don't. What I'm saying is they'd lose a pick if they didn't trade for Parra, the Brewers kept him and QO'd him, and then the O's signed Parra in the offseason. When a player is traded in midseason there's no option for a QO/compensatory pick.

Ok, the bolded part is the part that I wasn't following before. I would not assume that Milw would take the chance of offering him the QO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
    • Why carry four 1 inning guys over a LH long option? Cionel stinks and should not be on the roster over Povich when you still have Akin, Coulombe and Soto.
    • Really would be nice to win tonight OR have DET lose so then they can play around Sat/Sun when the games would have no bearing on the seeding. Dont want this to come down to Sunday and having to win to get the 4 seed or then there will be some tough decisions that have to be made.
    • Looking for a big performance from him next week. This is why he’s here. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...