Jump to content

Rosenthal: No Deal


33rdst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If a deal doesn't happen they both wasted time common be fair.

I don't think so. The O's were not actively shopping Roberts as much as the Cubs were trying to get him. The Cubs must have known they had to overpay somewhat to get him and yet they still held back. They are dealing with the Orioles, a team struggling to rebuild. They are not dealing with a team like Tampa Bay, whose future is already mostly in-house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. I think he even said something to the affect that we talked to Houston and they weren't interested...or something along those lines.
I think alot of it is him just speculating. If you notice he also said the Orioles are still scouting the Cubs minors leagues for what the health.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

brob is obviously a popular player with PA based on his public comments and this deal has been different then the others. everything else either happened in a window or didn't hit the press. more gut then evidence, but if pete wants to call and confirm i'm ok with that

Except of course for the Bedard stuff...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. The O's were not actively shopping Roberts as much as the Cubs were trying to get him. The Cubs must have known they had to overpay somewhat to get him and yet they still held back. They are dealing with the Orioles, a team struggling to rebuild. They are not dealing with a team like Tampa Bay, whose future is already mostly in-house.
Why do you think you have to over pay to get any player that is not true. You make deal hoping it works out for both teams so you can deal with them again. AM has said that in both trades he made. Further more how do you know if a trade is fair when dealing with prospects you don't to they prove they can play in the bigs. For example you won't know with the 2 trades the Orioles made until 2 or 3 years down the road you can speculate but you don't know for sure. That's why I call them supects you don't know how they will perform.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cubs knew what kind of offer they needed to make to get the deal done, but they still didn't do it. The Cubs wasted their own time and the O's time on this deal and not vice versa.

First - you have no idea what kind of offer the Cubs "needed to make to get the deal done". Second - there have been media reports that the Orioles still hadn't let the Cubs know exactly what they wanted for Roberts as recent as last week. Third - as has been reported by insiders here, the AM wanted to trade Tejada and Bedard before focusing on Roberts. So how is it that you come to the conclusion the Cubs wasted the Orioles time?

If MacPhail wouldn't settle for any package that did not include Pie and Hendry said he wasn't trading him, these rumors would have died long ago. IMO, both GMs must have thought they could reach an agreement otherwise why would either let this drag on for months? I don't think either wasted the other ones time. They just couldn't agree on the right deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a fair question what other team out there will make a offer like the Cubs did.

By an offer like the Cubs you mean an insufficient one from our perspective? Doesn't matter really - if it's not enough, AM won't take it, why on earth should he? The simple fact is AM didn't think it was a good trade for us. It doesn't matter if the Cubs thought it was good - trade talks often die on the vine, hardly unusual, no hard feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think you have to over pay to get any player that is not true. You make deal hoping it works out for both teams so you can deal with them again. AM has said that in both trades he made. Further more how do you know if a trade is fair when dealing with prospects you don't to they prove they can play in the bigs. For example you won't know with the 2 trades the Orioles made until 2 or 3 years down the road you can speculate but you don't know for sure. That's why I call them supects you don't know how they will perform.

I don't understand a word you're saying. You sure you're not a Yankee fan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By an offer like the Cubs you mean an insufficient one from our perspective? Doesn't matter really - if it's not enough, AM won't take it, why on earth should he? The simple fact is AM didn't think it was a good trade for us. It doesn't matter if the Cubs thought it was good - trade talks often die on the vine, hardly unusual, no hard feelings.

You act like Hendry offered some 34 year old career minor leaguer and two low A prospects. Maybe the market for Roberts isn't as good as AM or any Oriole fan think it is. There are many cases where the assest has more value to the owner then to any other person in the market place. That may be the case here. A deal including 4 decent prospects for a top of the order hitter is rare. Roberts is a fine player, but top of the order middle infielders don't warrant much on the trade market, historically speaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • @RZNJ and @Can_of_corn I appreciate the dialog. I think Jeter could have been a solid defender had he not been asked to play SS. So the quote above, (forgive me for picking a nit), is not entirely accurate. I don't think Jeter was "bad at defense." He was just not +10 at SS. There are a couple of plays that Jeter made that standout to me as showing outstanding defensive skill and situational awareness as well as athleticism. His issue is that he was not gifted with either the arm or the quickness to excel at SS. That coupled with the fact that A-Rod was a much better defensive SS than Jeter when A-Rod joined the MFYs makes me wonder is Jeter might have been a superb 2B or CF but was too stubborn to make the move. 
    • I think you need to give them a full season. Some of these guys will need to repeat because they are young for the level and just need lots of professional PAs.  Some will continue to fail, but the talented ones will keep getting chances for at least 700+PAs in A-ball.
    • Just didn't have the command. Middle-itis. Hopefully a one-off. 
    • Baumann has to be the one to go. I’m sure he’s a swell guy and all but he is not a major league pitcher. 
    • Once upon a time, Suarez was rated the 9th best prospect in the Appy League and as high as the 12th best prospect in the Rays system. He also did get parts of two seasons in the majors with the Giants. I know he's been bouncing around Japan and Korea for the past few years, but he wasn't completely off the radar earlier in his career. Reality may well catch up to him soon, but pitchers have weird trajectories sometimes.
    • I'm not a doctor, so if the O's are confident he is up to going back into the rotation as a full time starter, I suppose I will trust it. However, it makes sense to me to be conservative and manage his innings so he is in peak form in Sept/Oct. Of course, that takes for granted that we can get to the playoffs with him in a lesser role which may not be the case, but my inclination would be to stretch him out later rather than sooner.
    • All of that is fair to point out, some of which I did. My only issue with the snarkiness of the original comment like there was an over reaction going on by pointing out he's off to a disappointing start.  At the end of the day, Basallo is uber talented and he will figure it out. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...