Jump to content

Wieter's audition.


33rdst

Recommended Posts

Last night Buck started Wieters at first base, a position he had never started as a professional. It seemed odd since Buck rarely, if ever, exposes the catching position in that way. There was no catcher on the bench. Do you think Buck and Dan are auditioning Wieters for a possible long term deal? Clearly Wieters, given his size, age, and injury history, won't be catching at the back end of a long term deal. Our braintrust need to know that Wieters can provide an option other then catching. I think we'll see Matt at first several more times this year. Does a long term deal foe Wieters become more palatable if Wieters can play first base?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was Wieters' 2nd game at 1B this year and his second career start there. He wanted both Wieters and Paredes in the lineup against Sanchez. Putting Wieters at 1B is safer than handing Jimmy a glove.

I was surprised when Flaherty replaced Wieters for the 9th. If Caleb had gotten hurt, I guess Flaherty would have moved behind the plate, with Davis moving to 1B and Lough to the outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was Wieters' 2nd game at 1B this year and his second career start there. He wanted both Wieters and Paredes in the lineup against Sanchez. Putting Wieters at 1B is safer than handing Jimmy a glove.

I was surprised when Flaherty replaced Wieters for the 9th. If Caleb had gotten hurt, I guess Flaherty would have moved behind the plate, with Davis moving to 1B and Lough to the outfield.

You're right it was his second game there this year. He entered in the ninth inning earlier this year. However, I think it was his first career start. At least that is what BR has. And I think I remember Thorne mentioning that last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did it matter if the second catcher was on the bench or playing 1B. If Joseph had gotten injured, Wieters would have moved behind the plate and somsone else would have gone to 1B. A lot less risky than when Wieter's is the DH.

You're right. But Buck hasn't done that before. He seems to like to have a replacement a available on the bench. The Dh has less chance of getting hurt I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was just a way to get Wieters' bat in the lineup. I don't think Buck really wants to limit him to playing every other day, but he's concluded that Matt's arm is not going to stand up to catching much more frequently than that right now. Buck's not going to risk a further injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right it was his second game there this year. He entered in the ninth inning earlier this year. However, I think it was his first career start. At least that is what BR has. And I think I remember Thorne mentioning that last night.

No, BR has him starting at 1B and playing 8 innings in a game in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was just a way to get Wieters' bat in the lineup. I don't think Buck really wants to limit him to playing every other day, but he's concluded that Matt's arm is not going to stand up to catching much more frequently than that right now. Buck's not going to risk a further injury.

For now. Latter part of the schedule I'd think he'll play every day tho since he's definitely leaving Bmore, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was just a way to get Wieters' bat in the lineup. I don't think Buck really wants to limit him to playing every other day, but he's concluded that Matt's arm is not going to stand up to catching much more frequently than that right now. Buck's not going to risk a further injury.

I think it was a way to keep Davis in right field.

No idea why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was a way to keep Davis in right field.

No idea why.

Agreed, this is also very confusing to me. I also still don't understand how he routinely survives the defensive subs end game when there are clearly better defenders on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What has happened to Wieters walk rate? He has always been a pretty patient hitter with a 8.5% career walk rate coming to this year. However, that walk rate has been cut in half this year. It's all the way down to 4.4%. His power has been excellent as his 11.0% XBH% is well above career norms so his overall OPS is very solid. Maybe he's sacrificing patience for average and power or maybe he's just overanxious at the plate due to missing all that time and his pending free agency but his lack of patience at the plate this year has been pretty surprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't see the box score until this morning and figured Wieters and Joseph together meant we were facing a lefty. Then had a second take reaction when I saw we weren't.

I'm okay taking this kind of risk day to day. Some of it is I feel a karma safety net. Even if one catcher is used, the second one has a late game injury, and something ridiculous happens, well the same thing happened to Lenn Sakata one night in 1983.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...