Jump to content

The Oakland Series, August 3-5


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Wilson (1-1, 2.12) vs. Chavez (5-10, 3.53)

Gonzalez (9-7, 4.28) vs. Bassitt (0-4, 3.10)

Chen (5-6, 3.24) vs. Graveman (6-7, 3.84)

Chavez has struggled in most of his last 7 starts, seeing his ERA increase by a full run in that span. Wilson has looked good in his sporadic call-ups.

Bassitt was moved to the rotation at the end of June and has pitched well. In his four losses, the A's scored a total of 5 runs. Gonzalez has been spotty lately and needs to get back on track.

Graveman had been struggling a bit lately but was very good his last time out. Chen had one of his worst starts of the year last time out, but figures to do well in the A's cavernous ballpark.

The A's offense struggled mightily in July, even worse than ours. They just traded Zobrist, so their lineup does not feature anyone with an OPS over .800, and only two hitters (Reddick and Vogt) who have double-digit homers. These figure to be typical low-scoring Oakland games, though if we can get into Oakland's bullpen, they are not very strong, especially since they just traded Clippard.

Overall, this is a series that we need to win, and should win. I just hope we don't swing for the fences too much, since that doesn't really work well in Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A homer happy team that doesn't walk much is never a good thing in the O.co

O's have lost 17 of their last 23 in Oakland. Not sure if they should win but I'll be hopeful. As OFFNY says one game at a time.

Oakland is 23-31 at home this year. The O's are 21-31 on the road. Will see how it plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect Chen to dominate on his two road starts. Big ballparks. I wouldn't read too much into the lousy SP recently. That was just the Tigers lineup in a small ball park. They are stacked. Our pitchers should be able to navigate oaklands lineup for three quality starts. We need to bring the bats and the defense. I wouldn't mind seeing lough in rf this series. It will really help out Wilson and Chen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A homer happy team that doesn't walk much is never a good thing in the O.co

O's have lost 17 of their last 23 in Oakland. Not sure if they should win but I'll be hopeful. As OFFNY says one game at a time.

Oakland is 23-31 at home this year. The O's are 21-31 on the road. Will see how it plays out.

Is it just 17 of our last 23? It feels like we have lost about 50 of our last 60 out there. When they had mega-talented rosters from 2000 - 2002, it made sense....but I feel like they have always given us fits even with their "who the hell are the guys" rosters they have trotted out there in the last decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ChrisCotillo: To clear up confusion: Athletics have been awarded Valencia on the claim, source says. No trade needs to be worked out. He's an Athletic.

Need 2 out of 3 this series. Sweep would be awesome but the Os never sweep Oakland much less at that house of horrors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just 17 of our last 23? It feels like we have lost about 50 of our last 60 out there. When they had mega-talented rosters from 2000 - 2002, it made sense....but I feel like they have always given us fits even with their "who the hell are the guys" rosters they have trotted out there in the last decade.

Well, from 2003-06, the A's won 88 once and 91+ three times. Then they had a lull from 2007-11 but still won more games than the Orioles each year in that stretch. They made the playoffs in 2012-14, winning more games than we did in 2012-13. So basically, they had a better record than us every single year from 1999 through 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson (1-1, 2.12) vs. Chavez (5-10, 3.53)

Gonzalez (9-7, 4.28) vs. Bassitt (0-4, 3.10)

Chen (5-6, 3.24) vs. Graveman (6-7, 3.84)

Chavez has struggled in most of his last 7 starts, seeing his ERA increase by a full run in that span. Wilson has looked good in his sporadic call-ups.

Bassitt was moved to the rotation at the end of June and has pitched well. In his four losses, the A's scored a total of 5 runs. Gonzalez has been spotty lately and needs to get back on track.

Graveman had been struggling a bit lately but was very good his last time out. Chen had one of his worst starts of the year last time out, but figures to do well in the A's cavernous ballpark.

The A's offense struggled mightily in July, even worse than ours. They just traded Zobrist, so their lineup does not feature anyone with an OPS over .800, and only two hitters (Reddick and Vogt) who have double-digit homers. These figure to be typical low-scoring Oakland games, though if we can get into Oakland's bullpen, they are not very strong, especially since they just traded Clippard.

Overall, this is a series that we need to win, and should win. I just hope we don't swing for the fences too much, since that doesn't really work well in Oakland.

We must have a very different definition of "looking good". I know Wilson's ERA suggests he has been good but a 4.90 xFIP and a 2.12 K/9 (4 K in 17 IP) don't look good to me. He's looked lucky, and likely to get hit around soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure the statistics will back this up, but it seems to me the Athletics almost always give the Orioles a very hard time, no matter how good they are. Conversely, it seems like we always steamroll the White Sox, regardless of how good either team is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that every year, at some point or points during an A's-O's series at the Coliseum, I tell myself that the Orioles are losing a winnable game because they are unable or unwilling to alter their hitting approach in recognition of the difficulty of hitting balls out of the park.

I thought I'd get it in early this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that every year, at some point or points during an A's-O's series at the Coliseum, I tell myself that the Orioles are losing a winnable game because they are unable or unwilling to alter their hitting approach in recognition of the difficulty of hitting balls out of the park.

I thought I'd get it in early this year.

Thank you. I appreciate it. Maybe if we try to bunt more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missing Gray is nice. Graveman can get into trouble when he misses spots but can also exploit aggressive teams when he's on with his mutli-look FB/SL/CT combo. Sweepable series; seems like one you have to at least win during a push down the stretch. Must see TV!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does Wilson get on the roster tonight? Or is he already there?

I see Brach,O'Day,Roe, and Gyvens (the righties) and Britton and Matusz as the lefties. Am I missing a bullpen guy? Just curious, what they do after tonights starts since wilson won't be around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does Wilson get on the roster tonight? Or is he already there?

I see Brach,O'Day,Roe, and Gyvens (the righties) and Britton and Matusz as the lefties. Am I missing a bullpen guy? Just curious, what they do after tonights starts since wilson won't be around?

Rondon was sent back down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
    • It probably makes the most financial sense to extend Gunnar first and probably sooner rather than later. If he continues in this trajectory he may be headed for the MVP. If that happens then you probably don’t have much chance to extend unless it’s for a 300- 500 million type deal.
    • He’s really matured as a SP with his pitch mix. He did that yesterday without his curveball. He tried to get the curveball going with Renfigo but ended up walking him. 
    • I think that Trout HR shook GR a bit and he never really got settled in. That and he had his worst command of the season.  He will be alright. It happens. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...