Jump to content

5 biggest let downs of the MLB 2015 seaon


TouchemAll

Recommended Posts

o

If someone had told me 4 years ago that the Orioles being 57-56 after 113 games would be a major letdown, I would request to keep the letdowns coming.

That said, being only a game over .500 at this point in the season has been a letdown for me as an Oriole fan ...... in the context of the fact that we are coming off of 3 consecutive winning seasons, and 2 playoff births.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight...at 57-56, the Orioles are one of the top 5 letdowns, but at 58-56, the Nationals aren't??

Yes, some picked us to win the AL East. But EVERYONE picked Washington to win the NL East.

I called that they were overrated at the beginning of the year, and people looked at me as if I was stupid. God i love being right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight ... at 57-56, the Orioles are one of the top 5 letdowns, but at 58-56, the Nationals aren't??

Yes, some picked us to win the AL East. But EVERYONE picked Washington to win the NL East.

And now the Orioles have a better record than the Nationals, who lost again tonight:

http://espn.go.com/mlb/standings

And the Orioles play in a tougher division than do the Nationals, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the Red Sox?

:rofl:

I guess there are some people who still think that record = true talent. Like when I was 12 and expected the '84 Orioles to win 98 again.

So the 2015 Orioles were projected to win 96, and the Red Sox were projected to 71. But that doesn't explain the omission of the Nats, who should have been penciled in for 96 but are currently on pace for 82.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess there are some people who still think that record = true talent. Like when I was 12 and expected the '84 Orioles to win 98 again.

So the 2015 Orioles were projected to win 96, and the Red Sox were projected to 71. But that doesn't explain the omission of the Nats, who should have been penciled in for 96 but are currently on pace for 82.

What are you talking about?

Because I am talking about all the talking heads that thought the Red Sox were reloaded and ready to dominate.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=25949

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/fangraphs-2015-staff-predictions/

And yet the Red Sox are in last place playing right at their Pythag.

Who had the O's projected to win 96 games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was from yesterday's interview: Dan Duquette: "I thought we'd be a better ball club than we are".

And I agree with him. 9 guys from the Opening Day Roster gone, having not produced and we still have Gausman, Tillman, Hardy, and Reimold having career worst years. Did I miss anyone? There are so many...

Yeah it sure is a big letdown to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was from yesterday's interview: Dan Duquette: "I thought we'd be a better ball club than we are".

And I agree with him. 9 guys from the Opening Day Roster gone, having not produced and we still have Gausman, Tillman, Hardy, and Reimold having career worst years. Did I miss anyone? There are so many...

Yeah it sure is a big letdown to me.

Go ahead and take a look at Hardy's years in 2006 and 2009.

Go ahead and take a look at Reimold's years in 2010 and 2013.

Go ahead and take a look at Tillman's years from 2009-2011.

Go ahead and take a look at Gausman's year in 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talking about?

Because I am talking about all the talking heads that thought the Red Sox were reloaded and ready to dominate.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=25949

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/fangraphs-2015-staff-predictions/

And yet the Red Sox are in last place playing right at their Pythag.

Who had the O's projected to win 96 games?

I was just suggesting that the folks who think the O's are underachieving and the Red Sox not are the folks who think that this year's projection is basically last year's record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • The Marlins are not trading a guy who would be a highly sought after guy for a top 75 prospect, a one year expensive (for them) rental player and essentially a throw in vet in Urias.  That’s laughable.    Even if the Marlins really value the bat of Santander, that trade would get blown away by many other teams.
    • Hopefully Ohtani ends up in the NL. How crazy would this be if he didn’t get injured?  
    • Love Hyde. It hasn’t eased for me either. Bradish and Grayson got much needed exposure to the playoffs. Looking back on the juggernaut that Bradish faced… was that actually a “good” playoff start?  Grayson has all the humbling fuel to have a big offseason and learn to become a true #1. 
    • A Kimbrel signing would tell me that we’re out on Luzardo, and Cease. Wells as a SP. Why give up one of Westburg, Holliday, Mayo, Basallo, Cowser, or Kjerstad? I wouldn’t doubt if Santander, Urias, and Ortiz, was our actual best offer. Kimbrel as closer puts us where we were at the end of September. Wells should be able to build upon his really strong 1st half by able to go another 30-50 IP as a strong SP. I’d feel comfortable if we added Robertson too. The time to get aggressive is at the deadline. I doubt Elias and Co. chose Flaherty over Montgomery. Seems like his hands were tied over Montgomery costing more money the rest of the way. $4 million ish. Elias just knows what to expect this deadline and to leave himself some wiggle room. 
    • They need to add the ability to trade picks other than the awarded comp picks. 
    • IMO Bradish, Grayson, Means, Kremer, Wells Kimbrel, Cano, Webb, Baumann, Baker Coloumbe, Perez, Irvin AAA - Hall, Tate, Zimmerman, Akin It makes a lot of sense. We could bring in the Japanese reliever to have optionable depth on the RH side. We could sign Robertson. We wouldn’t have to trade a big piece for Luzardo/Cease. 
    • Do I care what Frazer thinks?    Yes,  he has been around for a while with Pittsburgh, Seattle before being part of a 101 wins in Baltimore.  He has a perspective that is interesting. I like his points about why Hyde is such a good manager.   His comment about Holliday was good to hear.     Glenn kept trying to get him pumped up about the O's being special and Frazier enjoy his time here.  Thinks they are winning group of players, some special moments but overall he wants to be on winning team and says there are other places to win. He know the chances of returning to the O's are slim.   And he also wants to get paid which is not in the cards with the O's going forward. Overall a nice interview.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...