Jump to content

Duquette says signing Davis a priority.


33rdst

Recommended Posts

What is the reason? (FYI, he's been traded twice, not three times.)

The reason is each of the teams that he was traded from knew they would not be able to keep him longterm and were simply recovering what value they could.

Arizona has Goldschmidt to try and lock up.

The Padres had him at a reasonable number for 1 year, they were never resigning him. If they were playoff contenders he would have stayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If CD continues to crush it then he is also going to crush it in the FA market.

If the number becomes inflated enough that the O's feel like it would impede or preclude them from having the money to lock up Manny as well....they should let him walk even if it hurts in the short term.

20 million AAV is if we are being generous somewhere between 1/6th and 1/7th of the O's likely payroll moving forward (120-140 million). That is least how much of your payroll you will have tied up in CD. Now if you want to have Manny longterm, your looking at two players eating up roughly 28-33% of your payroll. I just can't see that happening and frankly I am pretty sure its not the best thing for a franchise with pretty spotty number of position player prospects we have. If we were loaded with guys ready to come up, you could make an argument to do it. We are clearly not. I can't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My hope is Davis, Parra, O'day and Chen. Time to lose some dead weight in pearce and (more or less) Weiters.

Not so much that Wieters is dead weight as we just don't need him. Joseph and Clevenger will man the catcher position just fine next year. They won't re-sign 4 of their own, but if they could re-sign Davis and Parra that would be great. I have a feeling the plan all along was for Miranda to eventually replace Chen. O'Day is a nice luxury, but we can cover his loss in the bullpen with a ton of guys...most notably Brach and Givens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis with Boras as his free agent - Try 7 years/22m per year. 154m. The O's will not go there. And shouldn't.

They might be able to sign Parra. 3/9m. 27m.

Chen with Boras. 5/14m. 70m. O's could be in on him.

Wieters? McCann was hurt the year before he went FA. Still got 5/85. That is where I expect Wieters to be.

O'Day. Probably 3/21. But do the O's want to spend their money that way when they have Britton, Brach, Givens, McFarland, Drake, Roe, Cabral, Triggs, Toliver, Garcia, Berry, S. Johnson and Beato. And that is not counting Wright, Wilson and Miranda who could start or relieve.

My thoughts exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so much that Wieters is dead weight as we just don't need him. Joseph and Clevenger will man the catcher position just fine next year. They won't re-sign 4 of their own, but if they could re-sign Davis and Parra that would be great. I have a feeling the plan all along was for Miranda to eventually replace Chen. O'Day is a nice luxury, but we can cover his loss in the bullpen with a ton of guys...most notably Brach and Givens.

I'd think Chen would resign if the deal was nice enough. O'day is a big question mark, and I'd keep him so he isn't in pinstripes or in the great north (boston or toronto).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so much that Wieters is dead weight as we just don't need him. Joseph and Clevenger will man the catcher position just fine next year. They won't re-sign 4 of their own, but if they could re-sign Davis and Parra that would be great. I have a feeling the plan all along was for Miranda to eventually replace Chen. O'Day is a nice luxury, but we can cover his loss in the bullpen with a ton of guys...most notably Brach and Givens.

That and wieters is damaged goods, and not as good as they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason is each of the teams that he was traded from knew they would not be able to keep him longterm and were simply recovering what value they could.

Arizona has Goldschmidt to try and lock up.

The Padres had him at a reasonable number for 1 year, they were never resigning him. If they were playoff contenders he would have stayed.

He did stay in San Diego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if it would have been possible, but when CD was having his bad year last season, the whole amphetamine thing came out and DD was mentally gearing up for letting Cruz leave because 'We will have CD back next year' then surely that would have been the time to push for some form of contract extension, when his stock would have been at its lowest?

As for now, well losing CDs production would be a massive blow so if we are not going to stump up the cash, we will need to fund a premium slugger from somewhere in the off-season. I don't think there is a ready made DD quote 'We may be losing Chris but we have XXXXX coming back next season', as Mr XXXXX doesn't exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if it would have been possible, but when CD was having his bad year last season, the whole amphetamine thing came out and DD was mentally gearing up for letting Cruz leave because 'We will have CD back next year' then surely that would have been the time to push for some form of contract extension, when his stock would have been at its lowest?

As for now, well losing CDs production would be a massive blow so if we are not going to stump up the cash, we will need to fund a premium slugger from somewhere in the off-season. I don't think there is a ready made DD quote 'We may be losing Chris but we have XXXXX coming back next season', as Mr XXXXX doesn't exist.

Why would Davis sign a contract at his lowest value when he's got a year to redeem himself?

Not being snarky. But the player has a say too.

Sent from my 0PJA2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would Davis sign a contract at his lowest value when he's got a year to redeem himself?

Not being snarky. But the player has a say too.

Sent from my 0PJA2 using Tapatalk

Fair point, but even CD would have not guaranteed he would have another career season plus there may be a bit of 'I've screwed a year of my contract up, so will entertain a further years extension' going on.

I know, I'm in la-la land and all players are totally mercenary etc :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...