Jump to content

Alvarez coming up per Roch.


bpilktree

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The man is 26. He obviously will not be optioned. He will be added to the 40 man roster.

Okay got it. I was thinking that for some reason your options are affected if you join the 40, tough morning for me.

I do know that some teams wait until Sept 1 for contract/pay/arb reasons, anything to conerning with Alvarez about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay got it. I was thinking that for some reason your options are affected if you join the 40, tough morning for me.

I do know that some teams wait until Sept 1 for contract/pay/arb reasons, anything to conerning with Alvarez about that?

Only if you wished to not add him to the 40 at all this year. And that would not make sense with a 26+ year old Cuban. His value is over the next 72 months. As a Major Leaguer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should have seen all they needed in 2013.

I don't agree. That was his first year playing baseball after a couple of idle years while escaping Cuba, and so they needed to let him build his strength back up and get some more experience in the high minors. I think at this point, we've seen him and he is what he is, a AAAA player. That's what he looked like in 2013, but I think it was worthwhile to give him the chance to prove he could be something more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Improved? Sure. But how much growth would be needed for what we saw in 2013 to be a viable option and how likely is it that someone of his age could achieve that growth?

The thing about the age. I like what they said last week on 105.7 before the game, when talking about the cuban players. Sorry, I forgot who said it.

and I have to paraphrase, but the gist was, the cuban players are not as advanced as our guys, and takes them a bit longer to develop through the system. So when you look at their age and said, they are 26 and time has past them by, isn't as true for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree. That was his first year playing baseball after a couple of idle years while escaping Cuba, and so they needed to let him build his strength back up and get some more experience in the high minors. I think at this point, we've seen him and he is what he is, a AAAA player. That's what he looked like in 2013, but I think it was worthwhile to give him the chance to prove he could be something more than that.

Disagree all you like. The guy we saw in 2013, at the age of 26, was not going to transform himself into a valuable major league asset.

It didn't cost the O's to stash him away in the minors and see if he was a powerball ticket but the odds of that happening were extremely remote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about the age. I like what they said last week on 105.7 before the game, when talking about the cuban players. Sorry, I forgot who said it.

and I have to paraphrase, but the gist was, the cuban players are not as advanced as our guys, and takes them a bit longer to develop through the system. So when you look at their age and said, they are 26 and time has past them by, isn't as true for them.

It isn't the fact that they are more advanced that causes players to start declining with age.

It's age.

The O's Cuban players are all well over the age where defense peaks and they are rapidly approaching the point where other skills decline. What good is honing their game if the decline with age negates the improvement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't the fact that they are more advanced that causes players to start declining with age.

It's age.

The O's Cuban players are all well over the age where defense peaks and they are rapidly approaching the point where other skills decline. What good is honing their game if the decline with age negates the improvement?

Dang, I didn't know 26 was so old and ready for the walker. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree all you like. The guy we saw in 2013, at the age of 26, was not going to transform himself into a valuable major league asset.

It didn't cost the O's to stash him away in the minors and see if he was a powerball ticket but the odds of that happening were extremely remote.

He had 58 plate appearances in 2013. We saw him for what was the equivalent of 15 major league games. I would weight any number of other sources of information more highly than his 2013 MLB numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hicks was a big blessing to the team--we're very lucky we got him when we did. There's no way the Cowser we saw last year could have matched what Hicks provided, even on defense and on the basepaths. You cite BABIP, but drawing 35 walks in 236 plate appearances was a huge self-earned positive.
    • I had to think about it because Adley has always been a high priority for me. He's the franchise Catcher we never had. And in my opinion, the Catcher position is the Quarterback of a Baseball team. It's that impactful of a position and you need a good one to compete for championships. But with that said, Burnes is the Ace we've been waiting for since Mussina turned coat, and his contract is up at the end of the season. He's also one of the most reliable and durable pitchers in baseball. I think we should do what we can to keep him happy and make a business deal with him to keep him an Orioles pitcher.   If you're assuming that Rodriguez or Bradish will take over the Ace role, I think you've seen enough pitching injuries this year to tell you that you can't assume that will happen. You need to make sure any one of your top 3 starters can assume the #1 spot if pressed. Timing dictates Burnes as our biggest priority to work on. With Gunnar, he might be a future MVP and I've been one of his biggest fans since the moment he was called up. But his agent is Scott Boras, so good luck getting him to agree to an extension before free agency. And on that note, you'll have Scott Boras with a conflict of interest when you're trying to sign both Gunnar Henderson and Jackson Holiday long term and they both want to play shortstop.
    • People keep talking about Norby's flawed defense, meanwhile Holliday is looking pretty bad out there. Small sample size, I guess! But how long is the leash?
    • the Royals gave us the business tonight...except for the slam by Adley...we stunk to high hell tonight...especially the pen...Akin and  Tate...they both came up small.
    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
    • I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...