Jump to content

Who was DD trying to get?


TouchemAll

Recommended Posts

Unless he was trying to unload free agents to be for guys who can help us down the road, I'm glad he didn't get anything done. Duquette needs to listen to Kenny Rogers. He's gotta "know when to hold 'em. Know when to fold 'em. Know when to walk away. Know when to run!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Unless he was trying to unload free agents to be for guys who can help us down the road, I'm glad he didn't get anything done. Duquette needs to listen to Kenny Rogers. He's gotta "know when to hold 'em. Know when to fold 'em. Know when to walk away. Know when to run!"

If I were guessing, I'd say he was kicking the tires on Shields for next season and beyond and could not get the contract relief required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were guessing, I'd say he was kicking the tires on Shields for next season and beyond and could not get the contract relief required.

I'm skeptical of this scenario. In any event, it would be difficult to make the numbers work as Shields is owed big money the next couple years since his contract is heavily backloaded. I'm not sure the Padres would eat enough salary to make DD (or me) comfortable with that acquisition. Maybe if they were really creative and moved Ubaldo in the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were guessing, I'd say he was kicking the tires on Shields for next season and beyond and could not get the contract relief required.

Shields is owed 21 million a year over the next three years. He is 33. How much would the Padres have to pay?

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/jul/30/padres-james-shields-regression-trade-rumors/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No intent to insult anybody. It would be interesting if DD was trying to make a Shields acquisition work. His numbers are tough to make work.

Really tough. And you insulted no one. I was just spinning a tale. Thinking through who he could have been looking at up until 90 minutes before the end. And since it was a buy, not a sell,, what motivations might be in play. And also, who had passed through that we knew, or were relatively certain. And who on the other end was really panicked on their mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...