Jump to content

Which stat/ preview book should I buy?


DREKTUNES

Which Stat/ Projection/ Joe Morgan-hated Baseball book should I buy?  

9 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Stat/ Projection/ Joe Morgan-hated Baseball book should I buy?

    • Bill James
    • Baseball Prospectus
    • Hardball Times
    • No, no! This other one you haven't heard of!!!!!
      0


Recommended Posts

I'm like you and have only fairly recently tried to wrap my head around statistical analysis. I've enjoyed "Baseball Between the Numbers" by the Baseball Prospectus team, "The Book on The Book" by Bill Felber, and The Bill James Handbook. The first two are more useful (I think) for getting a better idea of how stats can be applied to understanding baseball, the last is a current collection of those stats.

There's also the "Get your Learn On" thread stickied at the top of this forum, which is helpful...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have started getting more interested in the stat/ projection end of baseball, and there are a few books I've been looking at. Which one should I get? I'd appreciate the help, as it's new ground for me.

I have all three of those. :o

If you want player-by-player, team-by-team analysis going into the season, I think the BP book is the best of the three. There are comments and projections on just about every player that matters and many who don't matter at all.

The Bill James book is interesting (of course), but it focuses on some interesting aspect of a handful of players on each team, while ignoring others. There are also a handful of typical James essays. I'm considering subscribing to his new website.

I wasn't too impressed with the Hardball Times book. The physical quality of the printing was amatuerish and the analysis was a little on light side and a little more fantasy-stats focused than I prefer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Baseball Between the Numbers" by the BP team is a fantastic place to start. It's readable for both the hard-nosed old school baseball fart for whom VORP is an oft-heard belch sound and the geekiest geek living in his mom's basement researching the baseball-reference database for hilarious ways to prove old#5fan wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To which THT book are you referring? If you're talking about the Baseball Annual, then you're a tough nut to crack if you didn't like their analysis. If you're referring to the Season Preview, then I'll have to believe you as I haven't read it.

It's the season preview. Even as a THT fan, I think you would also find it somewhat lacking. Just not enough meat in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Street & Smith's taught me to never buy season preview magazines. :P

I remember when those were about the best info available. The Hardball Times book, though disappointing, blows those relics out of the water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To which THT book are you referring? If you're talking about the Baseball Annual, then you're a tough nut to crack if you didn't like their analysis. If you're referring to the Season Preview, then I'll have to believe you as I haven't read it.

I have to admit up front that I'm not particularly a fan of BP, whereas I am a fan of THT - so I am definitely biased. The biggest beef I have with BP is that they rarely, if ever, tell you how their stats are derived, whereas THT almost always provides formulas for their stats. I also have to say that I did buy the second BP book, but don't remember being impressed (of course, that was before I was really into baseball stats).

I now remember what else turned me off about the Hardball Times preview book. The Orioles section, which I turned to first naturally, didn't acknowledge Andy McPhail at all. It credited Flanny with the Tejada trade. It also listed Baez as a potential closer in 2008.

If they're that far off-base, I have a hard time trusting other info in the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...