Jump to content

The importance of a J.J. Hardy bounce-back


Frobby

Recommended Posts

When I think of our path to being a contender next year, I think it's incredibly important that J.J. Hardy has a solid bounce-back season. Here's Hardy's rWAR and fWAR in his five seasons in Baltimore:

2011: 4.1, 4.4

2012: 3.2, 2.4

2013: 3.9, 3.3

2014: 3.3, 3.3

2015: 0.0, 0.0

Now, before you freak out about Hardy's lack of production this year, I have to point out that at one point he was at about 1.4 and seemed well on his way to exceeding 2.0 WAR this year despite missing the first month of the season. For the last two months, he was playing hurt and that affected both his offense and his defense, and he slipped all the way to 0.0.

We know that Hardy has a torn labrum (left shoulder) that he isn't planning to have surgery on. I'm sure that injury is affecting him, but that's not the only injury he was nursing. You could tell every time he ran to 1B that he was hurting pretty badly in his groin and/or his back.

So the big question here is, to what extent is it realistic to hope for a Hardy bounce-back? At this point, I don't think we can realistically expect more offensive output than we got back in 2014 (.682 OPS, still a lot better than the .564 we got last year but nowhere near his 2011 and 2013 seasons). But defensively, I think Hardy is still a topnotch SS when reasonably healthy. I think his range was just fine the first few months after he came back, but hampered at the end when he was hurting.

At this point, I'd be pretty happy if J.J. could be worth 2.0-2.5 WAR next season. That would be his second-lowest as an Oriole, but still a lot better than we saw this year. If he's as bad next year as he ended up being this season, it's going to be a long season. And I must say, that labrum worries me. I hope he does what he can this winter to strengthen it and his core muscles to try to get on the field a lot more in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's not the first time he's looked done (2009), but he also wasn't 33 going on 34 at that time. Also, near as I can tell, his defense didn't drag down his WAR last year. It was mostly offensive futility.

His defense was very good. However, his UZR/150 was at 16.4 at the 81-game mark, and ended up at 10.1. In my opinion, that's because his injuries hampered his range over the last two months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His defense was very good. However, his UZR/150 was at 16.4 at the 81-game mark, and ended up at 10.1. In my opinion, that's because his injuries hampered his range over the last two months.

Fair enough. At his age and position, though, I'd almost expect that kind of defense (i.e., second half). The bat is what concerns me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should be able to rehab the shoulder by building up the strength around it. If he can get through spring training in good health, my concern would be overplaying him. I think we need a backup SS who can play once or twice a week to keep Hardy as healthy as possible. That isn't Flaherty. His arm just isn't strong enough to play the left side of the infield on more than an emergency basis. It could be Janish, but his bat, even though it was strong at the end of this season, likely would hurt us bad. I don't think Buck would want to move Manny over to SS once or twice a week. And then there would be the question of who plays 3B when Manny plays SS.

I've thought that it might be time to flip Hardy and Manny, but Hardy has never been a diving for the ball kind of SS. I'm not sure 3B would suit him.

I'm hoping for Hardy to have one really strong year among the two left on his contract. Hopefully, it will be the one when we're in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we aren't in contention, a bounce-back JJ would be a really nice trade chip. Then rebuild around Manny at SS. Lots of ways a healthy JJ could help us.

Any doctor types have a sense of the prognosis for somebody with JJ's condition? Will 6 months of rest do it?

JJ can't be traded without his permission. He is a 10/5 guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bounce back? For 4 straight years his plate appearances have dropped from 713 to 437, and each year it falls faster. His OBP, never very good, is falling. His OPS+ has been way below 100 for each of the last 4 years. He's below .400 slugging in 3 of the last 4 yerars. He's 33 for next season with 2 years left on a big contract and he can't be moved.

His defense ought to be stellar, because he's now an offensive liability. And with Wieters likely to sign elsewhere, Joseph is probably a belwo average hitting catcher. That's 2 offensive liabilites. Davis is poised to sign elsewhere as well and his production wont be replace with a single player, too expensive.

Hardy better bounce back for a career year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bounce back? For 4 straight years his plate appearances have dropped from 713 to 437, and each year it falls faster. His OBP, never very good, is falling. His OPS+ has been way below 100 for each of the last 4 years. He's below .400 slugging in 3 of the last 4 yerars. He's 33 for next season with 2 years left on a big contract and he can't be moved.

His defense ought to be stellar, because he's now an offensive liability. And with Wieters likely to sign elsewhere, Joseph is probably a belwo average hitting catcher. That's 2 offensive liabilites. Davis is poised to sign elsewhere as well and his production wont be replace with a single player, too expensive.

Hardy better bounce back for a career year

His OPS+ in 2013 was 99.

You have an odd definition of "way below". Me, I wouldn't consider his 90 OPS+ in 2014 to be "way below".

So I guess he had a really solid year with the bat in 2007 when he had a 101 OPS+?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His OPS+ in 2013 was 99.

You have an odd definition of "way below". Me, I wouldn't consider his 90 OPS+ in 2014 to be "way below".

So I guess he had a really solid year with the bat in 2007 when he had a 101 OPS+?

90 is about league average for a SS.

Also, the point about his PA dropping each of the last three years is true, but meaningless. Hardy played in 159 games in 2013, so the fact that he had fewer PA in 2012 doesn't really reflect anything. The drop the last two years obviously does mean something, but let's not exaggerate and act like Hardy missed any significant time in 2013.

Anyway, I'm not expecting a full bounce-back. Just read the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we aren't in contention, a bounce-back JJ would be a really nice trade chip. Then rebuild around Manny at SS. Lots of ways a healthy JJ could help us.

Any doctor types have a sense of the prognosis for somebody with JJ's condition? Will 6 months of rest do it?

The arm injury (Labrum) is really bad on the throwing arm due to the throwing motion. The area becomes weak and you lose strength and power. I tore my throwing side. But it affected my swing at the plate. Plus their are different grades of tears and I'm not sure how bad of a tear JJ has. Since he isn't throwing with that arm I think it's not likely to get worse, unless he were to fall and use the arm to break the fall. I had a buddy slip on home plate wearing cleats in the rain. He fell straight backwards and tore the labrum and rotator cuff just by that fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The arm injury (Labrum) is really bad on the throwing arm due to the throwing motion. The area becomes weak and you lose strength and power. I tore my throwing side. But it affected my swing at the plate. Plus their are different grades of tears and I'm not sure how bad of a tear JJ has. Since he isn't throwing with that arm I think it's not likely to get worse, unless he were to fall and use the arm to break the fall. I had a buddy slip on home plate wearing cleats in the rain. He fell straight backwards and tore the labrum and rotator cuff just by that fall.

Just think of those bouncing balls up the middle where the SS dives to make the stop. That's probably how J.J. got the tear in the first place, and that's how he can reaggravate it. And you don't want your SS holding back on those plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
    • LOL, I was worried last year about getting swept in four games by the Red Sox when the magic number for the division was 1. Part of being a fan is imagining the worst case scenario. I would agree it's not likely, though.
    • O's just need to win 1. O's lose home field if they go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0. I actually have no idea what happens if the O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0, and Royals go 3-0. They'd all be 88-74. O's have tiebreaker over the Royals, but not over the Tigers. Royals have the tiebreaker over the Tigers, but not the Orioles. lol Does anybody know what happens in that situation? Does it go to intradivision?  If so, here are their records intradivision: Orioles: 32-20 (.615)  in AL East Royals: 33-19 (.634) in AL Central Tigers: 27-22 in AL Central Interestingly enough, that loss against the Yankees now means the Royals have the intradivision tie breaker. So it does look like there are 2 scenarios where the O's don't get home field: O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0 OR O's go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0/Royals go 3-0. If the Tigers lose, doesn't matter what the Royals or O's do.  I think?
    • Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's. DH vs Skubal = Rivera
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...