Jump to content

The importance of a J.J. Hardy bounce-back


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Is Range Factor a meaningful defensive metric?

I see out of 23 qualifying ML SS's Hardy was 21st in range factor, which supports my eye test that he doesn't cover much ground. The O's were also at the bottom of the league in turning DP's

IMHO Hardy will be below replacement level for the remainder of his contract, the only question is how far below, and when the O's bench him and/or eat his contract.

Thanks for sharing your opinion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Range Factor a meaningful defensive metric?

I see out of 23 qualifying ML SS's Hardy was 21st in range factor, which supports my eye test that he doesn't cover much ground. The O's were also at the bottom of the league in turning DP's

IMHO Hardy will be below replacement level for the remainder of his contract, the only question is how far below, and when the O's bench him and/or eat his contract.

Where are you getting this information? Because if you are looking at UZR, you need to consider that Lichtman doesn't include plays where there is a shift on individual ratings. BIS doesn't quantify shifts but only states if there was any shift during a play. That really screws up the data on individuals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you getting this information? Because if you are looking at UZR, you need to consider that Lichtman doesn't include plays where there is a shift on individual ratings. BIS doesn't quantify shifts but only states if there was any shift during a play. That really screws up the data on individuals.

Heh, not as bad as including shifts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you getting this information? Because if you are looking at UZR, you need to consider that Lichtman doesn't include plays where there is a shift on individual ratings. BIS doesn't quantify shifts but only states if there was any shift during a play. That really screws up the data on individuals.

There is a lot of this kind of "eye test" support going on these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Range Factor a meaningful defensive metric?

I see out of 23 qualifying ML SS's Hardy was 21st in range factor, which supports my eye test that he doesn't cover much ground. The O's were also at the bottom of the league in turning DP's

IMHO Hardy will be below replacement level for the remainder of his contract, the only question is how far below, and when the O's bench him and/or eat his contract.

Range factor isn't a very good metric, because it doesn't account for how many balls were actually hit towards the shortstop. UZR's Range Rate had Hardy as average (+0.1) on Range, but above average in Error Rate (+6.1) and DP Rate (+0.9), so his overall UZR of 7.1 (10.1 UZR/150) was 7th among the 23 qualifiers in UZR (5th in UZR/150).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Range factor isn't a very good metric, because it doesn't account for how many balls were actually hit towards the shortstop.

And how many balls were hit your way is one of those things that doesn't even remotely even out among players over a season. Your pitchers' GB rates, handedness, velocity, pitch assortment, plus park effects... just some of the things that bias range factor. RF was a decent interim step in the progression from "fielding percentage is everything" to modern metrics. In 1985 you were better off using RF than fielding percentage + gold gloves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I believe the decline of Hardy is greatly exaggerated. Backs are always concerning, but the Schoop collision set the season off on the wrong foot. A full off season of rest, coupled with playing time management, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a 2.5-3 win season.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...