Jump to content

Nats backing away from Bud Black over contract terms, hiring Dusty Baker instead


Frobby

Recommended Posts

This is one of those moves that, if it had happened to the Orioles, would have sent the OH into orbit about the way things were handled.

Word leaked out about a week ago that the Nats were hiring Bud Black to be their manager, though an announcement would not be made until after the World Series. Since then, the local media (Washington Post, etc.) has written numerous articles about Black and what a good choice he is for the job.

Except he's not taking the job. The Nats wanted to pay him less than $2 mm over two years, he felt insulted by that, and now there's no deal.

Back to the drawing board and Dusty Baker. There have been some indications that the Lerner family preferred Baker all along, but had deferred to Rizzo, who preferred Black. But then they went cheap on Black, and now they are ending up with Baker.

There's a lot of intrigue here, and I'm sure more will come out in the next few days. But the Nats look pretty awkward here.

There's your answer right there. I left out the "but" on purpose. Lerners wanted Baker and made an intentional insulting offer to get their own way. Straight manipulation.

Which is their right. They are the owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Barry Bonds during the 10 Dusty Baker years in San Francisco:

.311/.461/.664, 1,158 R, 437 HR, 1,096 RBI, 1,311 BB, 242 SB</p>? Christopher Kamka (@ckamka) <a href="

">November 3, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Iiiiii don't know how much Dusty had to do with that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe title="Twitter Tweet" class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" id="twitter-widget-0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 100%; height: 183.26px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: static; min-width: 220px; max-width: 500px;" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" data-tweet-id="661666963723300864"></iframe>

<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8" async=""></script>

So you're expecting Jayson Werth to have a huge resurgence? And Harper to put up a 2.000 OPS? Because Dusty was the real mastermind behind BALCO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Black would have been the better choice for them and this is definitely an awkward story. But Baker will probably be fine.

Williams was bad but really they just need their hitters to actually hit. Basically everyone besides Harper was bad this year, after the lineup was decent overall in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Black would have been the better choice for them and this is definitely an awkward story. But Baker will probably be fine.

Williams was bad but really they just need their hitters to actually hit. Basically everyone besides Harper was bad this year, after the lineup was decent overall in 2014.

The gap between the Nats and the playoffs wasn't much more than the difference between 2014 Jayson Werth and 36-year-old sub-replacement Jayson Werth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...