Jump to content

GM Meetings Nov. 9-12 Mega Thread


weams

Recommended Posts

That's why I don't run a baseball team. I'm just saying, they robbed us of a potentially incredible moment and it is a complete slap in the face to then sign someone from that team and remind us of that horrible time every single day. What a way to treat your fans. There's 28 other teams to get players from.

I don't understand the KC apologists on here.

I don't understand why you think anything was stolen. They won the series fair and square. They were entitled to exactly the same thing the Orioles were: whatever they accomplished on the field. The idea that you'd treat them as non-entities and allow your anger to make it harder to build a good Baltimore Orioles team is 100% absurd.

Calling people KC apologists for not joining you in being totally irrational is worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't understand why you think anything was stolen. They won the series fair and square. They were entitled to exactly the same thing the Orioles were: whatever they accomplished on the field. The idea that you'd treat them as non-entities and allow your anger to make it harder to build a good Baltimore Orioles team is 100% absurd.

Calling people KC apologists for not joining you in being totally irrational is worse.

My brother used to get really mad and pitch a fit when Alabama would lose a football game. He'd call the other team cheaters and say "I hope they never win another game."

Then he went into 5th grade and stopped acting like that.

Also, I don't think he knew what the word apologists meant at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neglecting a major league roster to correct a perceived weakness in the farm system is a bad strategy. The Royals, Cubs, Nationals, and of course us were bad for a looooong time before turning things around. Good franchises don't rebuild.

In relation to other franchises do you consider the Orioles a good franchise?

Don't be a homer....if you were a __________________ fan would you consider the Orioles a good franchise.

Personally I don't.....we have a owner who gave up on free agency and signing top players after Albert Belle (not including the weak market guys), our farm systems has been a mess since it produced Cal Ripken and has produced little, he allowed this mess with the Nationals happen, and now we are a small mid-market team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In relation to other franchises do you consider the Orioles a good franchise?

Don't be a homer....if you were a __________________ fan would you consider the Orioles a good franchise.

Personally I don't.....we have a owner who gave up on free agency and signing top players after Albert Belle (not including the weak market guys), our farm systems has been a mess since it produced Cal Ripken and has produced little, he allowed this mess with the Nationals happen, and now we are a small mid-market team.

Not particularly. I did believe in Miguel Tejada. MLB left Baltimore no choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not particularly. I did believe in Miguel Tejada. MLB left Baltimore no choice.

Tejada was a bargain signing that year. Meaning the Orioles were really just bidding with themselves.

Angelos was a big time lawyer ...he could've fought it in court and even was inside the distance allowed by baseballs bylaws if remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We’re also looking to add some pitching and pitching depth to the team as well as a catcher."

"We’re trying to add a couple of outfielders to our ballclub this year."

Steve Clevenger. "He's shown he's capable of contributing in the big leagues. We'll have him on our team."

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We?re also looking to add some pitching and pitching depth to the team as well as a catcher."

"We?re trying to add a couple of outfielders to our ballclub this year."

Steve Clevenger. "He's shown he's capable of contributing in the big leagues. We'll have him on our team."

Dan

Who's on first?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's on first?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Duquette on Davis: “We’re trying. We’ll see where that goes. Chris obviously has had some good years with the team. We’ll do our best.”</p>— Rich Dubroff (@RichDubroffCSN) <a href="

">November 10, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • he's not a TOR guy...and never will be.
    • The Verlander trade requires taking on a lot of money and then doing an extension for an older pitcher. And then that older pitcher missed a season with that team (and making a big salary) due to TJ. Are you comfortable with taking those kinds of risks? Oh, the OP was about extensions. No? I guess you are against all long term deals? If so, that is fine. I just have a difference of opinion. 
    • The pitching matchups, I have an eye on of if we skip Irvin and throw Grayson on Sunday. Without a change, Grayson would naturally get the Monday-Sunday next week, and miss the ensuing Monday-Thursday Yankees showdown. I think we generally want more Grayson and less Irvin, including against the Yankees, right? The other path would be to let him gas up extra after the Monday turn, and a home series vs. Oak isn't a bad scenario for a spot start.
    • With Elias and Rubenstein across the negotiating table Boras will know he is up against experts in talent evaluation and financial risk evaluation respectively.  This won’t be Buck circumventing Dan to convince Peter to pay his “big hairy guy” Chris Davis.  Parameters will be established and plan B’s will be in place to implement should Elias and Rubenstein choose to walk away from the table.  That being said discussions with Henderson should be the priority play with the Rutschman discussions happening concurrently but at a slower roll.   I don’t think you want Rutschman finding out that Henderson has been approached by the O’s first.  
    • I think he will be absolutely for that…but I also don’t think he has to for reasons I have stated in the past.
    • Well first of all, I think you are making the mistake that you have to trade high end assets to get good players.  That isn’t true (see Verlander) Secondly, as you continue to build good farm systems and develop good players, you can’t play them all. Trades have to be made. It’s a perfect use of resources. We aren’t talking about extensions. We are talking about big FA deals and yes, there is something wrong with it because those contracts largely blow up in your face.  It’s an awful use of resources and that has been proven time and time again. Just because the guy has had a good career the first 7-10 years doesn’t mean that it will continue to be as good.  Don’t get lured in by the name. The name doesn’t matter, the production does.
    • Is that your preference OR what you think Elias will do?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...