Jump to content

Duquette talks (Orioles to spend extensive resources in FA)


weams

Recommended Posts

And I do understand why we sometime will disagree. I respect your knowledge and your contacts and your abilities. As someone still here in the market, I can tell you that the last four years have been the best thing for the this team and it's fan-base. Not the worst. Even if accidental and not the result of a plan.

Oh, I agree it's good/fun. My point was more that there was the makings of a cheap core to build around long term, but it might have meant trading Davis after a monster year and trading Wieters when the value was higher. That just gets you the opportunity to be a long-term contender, though. Nothing guaranteed. I understand fans preferring four years of solid baseball over the hope for six or seven years of solid baseball.

In the end, you still need a machine capable of acquiring and developing if you want to compete long term. Even then, you can still end up Boston or Texas, with embarrassing years at the MLB level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Oh, I agree it's good/fun. My point was more that there was the makings of a cheap core to build around long term, but it might have meant trading Davis after a monster year and trading Wieters when the value was higher. That just gets you the opportunity to be a long-term contender, though. Nothing guaranteed. I understand fans preferring four years of solid baseball over the hope for six or seven years of solid baseball.

In the end, you still need a machine capable of acquiring and developing if you want to compete long term. Even then, you can still end up Boston or Texas, with embarrassing years at the MLB level.

If the players had the seasons that they did and the team still was a 18 season loser, we would be well on our way to having a well stocked farm and the prospects of a great young team for the post Buck years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I would never have been comfortable with not offering. No matter the risk. And you could not trade him during the season because he was still broken. It's just a matter of injury here. Not bad planning.

But that's inconsistency in thinking, if that's how the FO viewed this. They have not assigned that level of import to draft picks at any time over the past four years. Just weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that's inconsistency in thinking, if that's how the FO viewed this. They have not assigned that level of import to draft picks at any time over the past four years. Just weird.

I know. They haven't. But if they had traded Johnson a year early, and Adam and Chris at Max value and Tillman after his good year, and Weiters before blowout, and Britton at the trade deadline, and O'Day while we were chasing playoffs again, and not have signed Ubaldo and Cruz, we would be in much better shape. For Manny's final season.

Not even taking into consideration that Bundy should have been someone we were concerned about. Always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. They haven't. But if they had traded Johnson a year early, and Adam and Chris at Max value and Tillman after his good year, and Weiters before blowout, and Britton at the trade deadline, and O'Day while we were chasing playoffs again, and not have signed Ubaldo and Cruz, we would be in much better shape. For Manny's final season.

Not even taking into consideration that Bundy should have been someone we were concerned about. Always.

It's not a matter of absolutes. Making additional moves doesn't require you to trade everyone. Not crazy to think Baltimore could have Jones/Machado/Schoop/Wieters and two more cost-controlled regulars, Gausman and two more cost controlled SPs. That's a heck of a core for a very reasonable price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a matter of absolutes. Making additional moves doesn't require you to trade everyone. Not crazy to think Baltimore could have Jones/Machado/Schoop/Wieters and two more cost-controlled regulars, Gausman and two more cost controlled SPs. That's a heck of a core for a very reasonable price.

I liked the quality of your buy/sell proposal from last year. And really, the results would be better your way even though the buy part would have ended with the same result that we had. Without the fun until September.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baltimore could have Jones/Machado/Schoop/Wieters and two more cost-controlled regulars, Gausman and two more cost controlled SPs. That's a heck of a core for a very reasonable price.

I like that core and would like the future had that plan have been executed. Davis would have had to have been traded after 2013. And Tillman after 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...