Jump to content

Duquette talks (Orioles to spend extensive resources in FA)


weams

Recommended Posts

Interesting. What I take away from it is that the Wieters deal is not as big of a factor to the O's offseason strategy. Maybe they are looking at budget over a 3-4 year period, and as long as they are not committed in future years they may be OK going over budget this year for somebody they like.

Honestly this is how we should be viewing our spending anyway, in 3 - 5 year windows. Sometimes you'll be have to be FA heavy and spend a bit more; others you may have more young guys and can make it up with spending less. I know salaries have been going up a little more than anticipated, but you should still be able to predict at least a handful of years out somewhat accurately. IMO setting a non-flexible budget year to year handcuffs you by removing your flexibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I will take the fact that DD is acknowledging they need pitching as a positive. :)

I would rather here him say that we need pitching than spend his time talking up Miggy, KG, Ubaldo and guys like Wright, Berry, Gunkel, Bundy etc..... Not saying that those guys are not worth having around and can't be part of a good team but none of them NOW is a TOR or even a consistent #2

The first step is to admit you have a problem :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take the fact that DD is acknowledging they need pitching as a positive. :)

I would rather here him say that we need pitching than spend his time talking up Miggy, KG, Ubaldo and guys like Wright, Berry, Gunkel, Bundy etc..... Not saying that those guys are not worth having around and can't be part of a good team but none of them NOW is a TOR or even a consistent #2

The first step is to admit you have a problem :)

He admitted the team needed to improve it's OBP years ago.

How is that working out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, certain posters create of false choice of either not having the last 4 years or not having a better future.

Of course, Weams and others will say it was worth it. Time to pay the piper. We could have had two playoff appearances and a brighter future than we have today.

It was worth it. I bet we can still win some games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Davis could have been traded after the 2013 season. Would we have not made the playoffs in 2014 and won 96 games without his .198 average and suspension? A couple of extra top 10 prospects or young ML players obtained in a Chris Davis trade.

Crystal ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, certain posters create of false choice of either not having the last 4 years or not having a better future. We could have done both. Chris Davis could have been traded after the 2013 season. Would we have not made the playoffs in 2014 and won 96 games without his .198 average and suspension? Would we have not made the playoffs if we had not traded Eduardo Rodriguez for Andrew Miller. Maybe we don't beat Detroit in the 1st round but we still make the playoffs. Did it make any sense to trade Zach Davies last year for Parra?

Yes, all of our moves have been now moves. And now we have a .500 team with almost no prospects. Imagine a team, that made the playoffs in 2012 and 2014 and had a young rotation of Gausman, Rodriguez, Davies, Tillman, and Jimenez, and a couple of extra top 10 prospects or young ML players obtained in a Chris Davis trade. Little would be different except a possible earlier ouster in the 2014 playoffs. Of course, Weams and others will say it was worth it. Time to pay the piper. We could have had two playoff appearances and a brighter future than we have today.

All that said, I think Dan made big mistakes in some of those trades and after seeing 2013 and 2015 I assure you that if I could go back and tell him how it works out, that he would listen to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, certain posters create of false choice of either not having the last 4 years or not having a better future. We could have done both. Chris Davis could have been traded after the 2013 season. .

There is not a GM strong enough to have traded Chris after that year. Not even Billy Beane. Certainly not me or you. We would like our jobs to much to take that gamble. And we would each have no track record of success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called an opinion. I think mine makes more sense than yours. As a poster you are basically an Orioles apologist. A good guy. Great moderator. Objectively when it comes to the Orioles? Zero.
It's a good opinion. You are welcome to it. Neither one of our opinions is more valuable. Thanks for calling me the apologist. Some folks value my opinions as much as they do yours.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...