Jump to content

MW QO Acceptance: For or Against the QO?


Crazysilver03

What is/was your stance on the QO?  

61 members have voted

  1. 1. What is/was your stance on the QO?

    • For the QO before and after acceptance
    • Against the QO before and after thr acceptance
    • For the QO before acceptance, against after acceptance
    • Against the QO before acceptance, for the QO after acceptance

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Scott Boras: "There’s no question the qualifying offer system impaired Matt Wieters." <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/OriolesTalk?src=hash">#OriolesTalk</a></p>— Rich Dubroff (@RichDubroffCSN) <a href="
">December 9, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I question that. In fact, I think the system is helping him. He gets paid more than he is worth this year, with the opportunity to really cash in next year, if he performs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangers showing some people interest in Wieters.

Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports tweets that the Rangers checked in with the Orioles on Matt Wieters after Wieters accepted the one-year, $15.8MM qualifying offer. Wieters, of course, would’ve had to approve any trade proposal that may have arisen (as is stipulated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...