Jump to content

Making "No" Sound Like "Yes"


Number5

Recommended Posts

To be clear, I am happy with the Orioles offer to Davis. If that falls through, that is on Davis/Boras, not the Orioles. What has stunned me today is DD's comment that apparently, that money will not be reallocated this year if Davis doesn't take it. Again, the way I read it is the plan if Davis doesn't sign is to bring the salary budget up to what it would have been had Davis signed this year gradually over an 8 year period. He is not talking about spreading $150 over 8 years; he is talking about spreading $22 million over 8 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And the first year of a long term deal could be as little as $5M, as it is for O'Day.
Where did you find the figure for O'Day's first year? I looked in Cot's and they just list it as 4/31, they didn't break it down, and it hasn't been added to bbr's payroll yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you find the figure for O'Day's first year? I looked in Cot's and they just list it as 4/31, they didn't break it down, and it hasn't been added to bbr's payroll yet.

It's been reported in various places. This is from MLBTR quoting a Dan Connolly tweet:

Dan Connolly of the Baltimore Sun (Twitter links) has more details. O’Day will earn $5MM in 2016, $6MM in 2017, and $8MM apiece in 2018 and 2019. He’ll then take home $1MM annually for each of the next four years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those comments by DD won't help sign Davis. Davis questioned the Orioles commitment when extention talks were going on. Basically, DD said there's money for Davis but no one else. Why bother signing Davis then. And no way will Manny sign a team friendly deal. They need to start looking at packages for Manny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we should sign Melvin just to show Justin we are super serious. Melvin should be cheap right?

Melvin is owed $32M over the next two years by the Padres. They would love for us to take him off their hands. He had a nice little bounceback year last year, but makes way too much money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Melvin is owed $32M over the next two years by the Padres. They would love for us to take him off their hands. He had a nice little bounceback year last year, but makes way too much money.

I was joking

Edit - I thought M. Upton had been outright released since signing that contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...