Jump to content

Which starting 9 would you prefer?


El Gordo

Which starting 9 would you prefer?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Which starting 9 would you prefer?


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

There are a number of teams interested in Alvarez, so I wouldn't be surprised if he got 2 years. Plus if we land Davis we have to trade Trumbo to make room for Alvarez. That makes little sense since Trumbo has ok splits v RHP and can play 1B/COF as well as DH, while Avaraz has no position and can't hit LHP.

If Trumbo can play CO, why would we need to trade him?

To be clear, I'm not advocating signing both Davis and Alvarez. Your choices basically boiled down to Upton and Alvarez versus Davis and Reimold. My point is that Davis' and Upton's 2016 salaries will likely be similar, so if you have the money for your B choice, there should be money to upgrade over Reimold (I wouldn't have signed him for 1.3M BTW). You could get Alvarez if you're comfortable with Trumbo in RF or you could bring back Pearce to be the RF. Whether or not those would be upgrades would be up for debate.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If Trumbo can play CO, why would we need to trade him?

To be clear, I'm not advocating signing both Davis and Alvarez. Your choices basically boiled down to Upton and Alvarez versus Davis and Reimold. My point is that Davis' and Upton's 2016 salaries will likely be similar, so if you have the money for your B choice, there should be money to upgrade over Reimold (I wouldn't have signed him for 1.3M BTW). You could get Alvarez if you're comfortable with Trumbo in RF or you could bring back Pearce to be the RF. Whether or not those would be upgrades would be up for debate.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Trumbo is a situational OF that's all. He's a 1B/DH. Alvarez is DH period.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I count the same in each.

Option A

AJ

JJ

Trumbo

Schoop

Reimold

Machado

Lefty/switch - Kim, wieters, Davis

Option B

AJ

JJ

Trumbo

Schoop

Upton

Machado

Lefty/switch - Kim, wieters, Alvarez

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL we're talking PEDRO Alvarez? I thought this was Dariel.

I would rather have Dariel or Reimold over Pedro Alvarez even though they are both RH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Trumbo can play CO, why would we need to trade him?

To be clear, I'm not advocating signing both Davis and Alvarez. Your choices basically boiled down to Upton and Alvarez versus Davis and Reimold. My point is that Davis' and Upton's 2016 salaries will likely be similar, so if you have the money for your B choice, there should be money to upgrade over Reimold (I wouldn't have signed him for 1.3M BTW). You could get Alvarez if you're comfortable with Trumbo in RF or you could bring back Pearce to be the RF. Whether or not those would be upgrades would be up for debate.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is there any cleverness to the Reimold deal perhaps? Can we DFA him without it being a situation where we owe the whole amount less the minimum? Just thinking if we can essentially have him as AAA depth unless some team wants to take the above-minimum salary. Essentially paying $750K or so extra to garner a 26th roster spot possibly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like option B, because I prefer Upton to Davis. But I will say that Alvarez scares me a little. Does anyone else find it disconcerting that the Pirates, a winning team, were trying to get rid of him for quite some time? I remember issues as he was coming up, about his unwillingness to do interviews. Not sure how relevant those things are now, but I have a hunch he's not exactly Buck material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the crowd much more concerned with who is replacing Chen's innings as oppposed to Davis' ABs. If Davis comes back adding Trumbo and Kim probably make the offense better than last year regardless of who the other COF is. If they bring in Upton and Alvarez the production is again probably better than last years lineup.

If Trumbo is is 70% of what Davis gave the team but they upgrade the COF enough and DH(which shouldn't be hard) to make up for over last year's production it's still a top 10 run scoring team with only a couple more minor signings

Chen was the best SP the team had last year. Even if KG, Ubaldo, Gonzalez and Tillman all improve over last year's performance it won't be enough to make up the difference between Chen's 2015 and the 2016 stats of Worley/Wright/Wilson as the 5th starter.

I know the long ball is fun and putting up 5 runs a game is great, but stopping the other team from scoring more than you is still important too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if KG, Ubaldo, Gonzalez and Tillman all improve over last year's performance it won't be enough to make up the difference between Chen's 2015 and the 2016 stats of Worley/Wright/Wilson as the 5th starter.

Not sure about that. If all 4 improve to the tune of a #2 and all #3 with our top 3 bullpen that is huge. #5 starter would only need to an innings eater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like option B, because I prefer Upton to Davis. But I will say that Alvarez scares me a little. Does anyone else find it disconcerting that the Pirates, a winning team, were trying to get rid of him for quite some time? I remember issues as he was coming up, about his unwillingness to do interviews. Not sure how relevant those things are now, but I have a hunch he's not exactly Buck material.

Alavarez is extremely tight with Flaherty who was his roommate at Vandy and Flaherty is a huge Buck guy. Pretty sure Alvarez and Buck would be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A)

C Wieters

1B Davis

2B Schoop

3B Manny

SS JJ

LF Kim

CF AJ

RF Reimold

DH Trumbo

or B)

C Wieters

1B Trumbo

2B Schoop

3B Manny

SS JJ

LF Kim

CF AJ

RF Upton

DH Alvarez

Good thread.

One of the main reasons why I would like to have Chris Davis back is for his defense at 1st base.

I also like the fact that Nolan Reimold (our most patient batter at the plate) stayed healthy for all of last season ...... plus, he's inexpensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think you'd see a much stronger correlation to how they were rated in the minors vs. draft position. Westburg has been treated similarly to Cowser and Kjerstad. Adley, Gunnar and Holliday were all consensus #1 prospects and have been given pretty much immediate every day player status.
    • Game ball or the equivalent of hockey star(s) of the game for me: Suarez — all of those zero’s on the road, gets my game ball. Kimbrel is my runner-up. I know striking out Trout with the bases loaded is the job, but it ain’t easy. Cowser - Honorable Mention. I’m still not 100 percent in on the Milkman nickname, but he sure is fun to watch.
    • Yeah - I was thinking Beavers could fill that spot, but it seems he is more suited for a corner outfield position, if he makes the bigs at all.
    • We have all this year and next if it’s needed.   No rush.  No hurry. 
    • Kjesrtad was Elias's #1 pick in 2020 draft and #2 overall, so Elias saw something great in him.  Can you all imagine how powerful the O's will be if Holliday starts to hit and Kjerstadt hits like he did in the minors, Kjesrtad did good when he was called up in 2023.  They will be the Baltimore Bombers!
    • I'm not crushing Santander either, but he's a career .765 OPS guy. It was .797 last year. His only year over .800 was the Covid year. He plays average defense. Not a butcher, but not exactly rangy out there. Long story short, I think you can get similar power with more OBP from Kjerstad and Cowser with similar defense for Kjerstad and better for Cowser. So yes, I'd say they'll be better than Santander.
    • Can we get Buster Olney, talking heads, and various posters to look in the mirror for their ridiculing Elias' "hoarding" prospects? The strategy has always been about raising the competitive floor/ceiling while managing risk like a portfolio manager.  Seeking alpha while managing beta is the goal.  Sig's purpose is the quantify. And yet we still have people tossing out trade proposals and extensions and unhealthy FA pursuits because they know better and moving prospects to other positions.  It's fun to speculate but it's foolish to present it as an absolute.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...