Jump to content

Why I would rather sign Alex Gordon than Chris Davis


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

With apologies to Steve Jankowski, who will be heart-broken if the O's sign Gordon, and to Weams, who doesn't want to give up the pick.

1. Trumbo is considered at least as good a defender at 1B than Davis, and Davis is not a good outfielder (even though he can do the job as a last resort). Adding Davis now would be a plus offensively, but redundant defensively unless we then traded Trumbo.

2. Trumbo is the bridge to Mancini. Davis blocks Mancini.

3. Gordon will cost considerably less, which will be important beyond this year. Depending on his contract, over five years the savings could allow the O's to spend $50M to $70M elsewhere.

4. As we saw last year, and as FIP has been indicating, O's pitching relies on the defense. Adding a plus defender in the outfield would make all the pitchers better.

5. Davis was a high OBP guy last season. Gordon has been one his whole career. In fact, if it hadn't taken Gordon until age 27 to become a regular, he would have been held in the same regard as Heyward is today. He is the player Heyward most resembles; the only difference is age.

6. As Gordon ages, his defense will decline as he loses foot speed, but he likely will still be better than any other COF currently on the market.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
With apologies to Steve Jankowski, who will be heart-broken if the O's sign Gordon, and to Weams, who doesn't want to give up the pick.

1. Trumbo is considered at least as good a defender at 1B than Davis, and Davis is not a good outfielder (even though he can do the job as a last resort). Adding Davis now would be a plus offensively, but redundant defensively unless we then traded Trumbo.

2. Trumbo is the bridge to Mancini. Davis blocks Mancini.

3. Gordon will cost considerably less, which will be important beyond this year. Depending on his contract, over five years the savings could allow the O's to spend $50M to $70M elsewhere.

4. As we saw last year, and as FIP has been indicating, O's pitching relies on the defense. Adding a plus defender in the outfield would make all the pitchers better.

5. Davis was a high OBP guy last season. Gordon has been one his whole career. In fact, if it hadn't taken Gordon until age 27 to become a regular, he would have been held in the same regard as Heyward is today. He is the player Heyward most resembles; the only difference is age.

6. As Gordon ages, his defense will decline as he loses foot speed, but he likely will still be better than any other COF currently on the market.

Thoughts?

I'd rather have Upton ... Age and performance over Gordon ... Agree why they are better for the Os than Davis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With apologies to Steve Jankowski, who will be heart-broken if the O's sign Gordon, and to Weams, who doesn't want to give up the pick.

1. Trumbo is considered at least as good a defender at 1B than Davis, and Davis is not a good outfielder (even though he can do the job as a last resort). Adding Davis now would be a plus offensively, but redundant defensively unless we then traded Trumbo.

2. Trumbo is the bridge to Mancini. Davis blocks Mancini.

3. Gordon will cost considerably less, which will be important beyond this year. Depending on his contract, over five years the savings could allow the O's to spend $50M to $70M elsewhere.

4. As we saw last year, and as FIP has been indicating, O's pitching relies on the defense. Adding a plus defender in the outfield would make all the pitchers better.

5. Davis was a high OBP guy last season. Gordon has been one his whole career. In fact, if it hadn't taken Gordon until age 27 to become a regular, he would have been held in the same regard as Heyward is today. He is the player Heyward most resembles; the only difference is age.

6. As Gordon ages, his defense will decline as he loses foot speed, but he likely will still be better than any other COF currently on the market.

Thoughts?

Interesting point there. It obviously depends on how confident that one is in Mancini's ability to translate his success at the high levels of the minors (Advanced-A and AA so far for him) to the majors in 2017 and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting point there. It obviously depends on how confident that one is in Mancini's ability to translate his success at the high levels of the minors (Advanced-A and AA so far for him) to the majors in 2017 and beyond.

We really won't know until he arrives, though he could spend some time on the team this year, most likely as a fill-in DH for a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...