Jump to content

Can the O's sign Manny and Chris Davis long term?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That choice would be very obvious. Manny is far more likely to provide excess value compared to Davis. But we don't have the luxury of waiting to see if we can lock up Manny before making a decision on Davis.

I personally feel we can afford both. It's really more a question of whether the Davis contract is worthwhile on a standalone basis.

We can afford lots of players that never end up signing, I wouldn't put much weight in what we "can afford" but more what Pete is willing to spend.

I think there is a good possibility neither will be here long term much less both.

I mean this is a team that has a previous max contract(singular) of 85 milliion. And you think Pete is going to kick out 300m plus in a year(ish) time frame?

Right after Roberts deal until now is when they have spent the equivalent of that money on significant signings. On 24 different players, a far cry from 2. Over about 6 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can afford lots of players that never end up signing, I wouldn't put much weight in what we "can afford" but more what Pete is willing to spend.

I think there is a good possibility neither will be here long term much less both.

I mean this is a team that has a previous max contract(singular) of 85 milliion. And you think Pete is going to kick out 300m plus in a year(ish) time frame?

Right after Roberts deal until now is when they have spent the equivalent of that money on significant signings. On 24 different players, a far cry from 2. Over about 6 years.

http://nypost.com/2015/12/26/241m-juggling-act-how-yanks-tread-line-between-threat-and-phillies/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to see Potter handing out a 300 million contract in the next year or two. I hope I am wrong, but if not, then you gotta trade.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yes you are probably right. Manny is home grown talent. I'd rather give Manny

150 million than CD. I just hope Peter can see the importance of Manny and will

do something to keep Manny. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be more inclined to sign Machado long term but neither HAS to be extended for the Orioles to remain competitive and relevant. Just need to know when to get the most value in return. Machado cannot be allowed to walk away for a draft pick. I don't think the Orioles have the balls or the smarts to trade him before that though.

If the team is bad (90+ losses) in 2017 I could see him getting moved at the deadline or after the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://www.csnmidatlantic.com/blog/orioles-talk/machado-hoping-orioles-are-able-keep-him-around

“I’m actually not. I knew we had to do something. The front office has been working on making this ballclub the best team out there on the field, and I think they’re accomplishing that. Obviously we really didn’t bring new faces in here, but I don’t think we need new faces,” Machado said.

“You bring those guys back who are going to help this team no matter what. It makes this team much better, makes us stronger. We’re just looking forward to playing together again.”

Machado, who is free of the health worries that plagued him a year ago when he was six months removed from his second knee surgery in a year, is still three years away from free agency. He hopes to remain here.

“They’re trying to keep everybody here. That’s good for me. I hope they keep me here long-term. But the case is you can’t sign everybody. You can’t bring everybody back. It’s just part of the business,” Machado said.

“I think we have one of the best clubhouses in the game. I’m just fortunate to be a part of it and hopefully I’m here for a long time.”

Chris Davis’ seven-year, $161 million contract was nearly twice the team’s record contract.

“I mean there’s hope. That brings out hope,” Machado said. “It just brings me hope that they’re trying to keep everybody here and hopefully they can come up with something and we can make something happen.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That choice would be very obvious. Manny is far more likely to provide excess value compared to Davis. But we don't have the luxury of waiting to see if we can lock up Manny before making a decision on Davis.

I personally feel we can afford both. It's really more a question of whether the Davis contract is worthwhile on a standalone basis.

I would like to think that DD and PAG are smart enough to know, if they can only afford one, then Manny needs to be that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As all of you do, I believe that Manny will be a superb player for many more years. But given the glaring inability of the Oriole farm system to cultivate enough new frontline players, especially SPs, we've got to consider the possibility of trading Manny for several top-rated prospects at positions that will open up in the next 1-2 years. Seems to me that's a much quicker and reliable path than trying to improve the farm system from within. There, I've said it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Its worth mentioning those 2023 Braves also have the seasonal wRC+ record since integration, beating the peak Astros, Big Red Machine, Harvey's Wallbangers, whatever Jeter/Manny Yankees/Red Sox unit is your favorite, etc. The 2024 Orioles and Braves are on top of them all right now if you split seasons, but that's just like Luis Arraez hitting .450 25 games into the season.    I believe Sigbot expects Holliday, Mayo and Basallo to all be more than Westburg, so either Elias is going to get his biggest bust sometime in the next few years or there's a chance the run production will be pretty special. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&month=0&ind=1&team=0%2Cts&startdate=&enddate=&season1=1947&season=2024&sortcol=18&sortdir=default&pagenum=1
    • This is probably correct, but I could see things getting ugly for them if they are complacent. They need to win at a 60% rate from here out to reach 90 wins this season. That could be tough.
    • I agree completely. It is a risk. But IMO the potential reward is worth the risk. You can’t make the shots that you are unwilling to take.
    • I mostly agree about players generally being able to deal better than us with the ups and downs, but I recall Hyde saying how hard those losing seasons were and he wasn’t sure how much more he could take. That aside, I am as addicted as Roy and a lot of us hear who love the game and the Birds in particular.
    • Not a ton of relievers in the Hall of Fame.   KRod at 437 saves has gotten 10.8% and 7.8% of the votes in his first two tries; Lee Smith at 478 saves got into the HOF only through selection by the Today’s Game Era Committee.   I’d say the odds are against Kimbrel being elected by the writers unless he ends up somewhere north of 500 saves, and even then he’d be no sure thing.    Pretty good shot that Kimbrel passes KRod this year and finishes the season 4th or 5th on the all time saves list, depending what Kenley Jensen (one ahead of him) does the rest of the year.      
    • No doubt. As I was about to settle into bed last night to wait for the Os game to start (west coast start time, after all) my wife came in and casually said "Os won, that's good" as she was putzing around the room. Not knowing it was a day game and it had been played hours ago my first reaction was "damnit, what?!" instead of "oh cool".   Addict.  
    • This is spot on. You make the offer if there is need and he projects as worth that amount within the context of what else you play to do financially. Does he fit into your total budget plan if he accepts? If he's still here in September, we will have a better feel for the situation.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...