Jump to content

Who do you want?


ChuckS

Pick one  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. Pick one

    • Chris Davis at 6/125, no deferred money
      20
    • Yoenis Cespedes at 5/100, keep the pick
      28
    • Justin Upton at 6/110, lose the pick
      63


Recommended Posts

I feel this is an appropriate poll since we are down to three impact bats. Of the big three left, who do you want? If you want none of them then pick who you would not want the least. I'm projecting the years and AAV to the best of my ability based on what the market has dictated, QO's, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Good poll. The options are all pretty close IMO, and all are better than the Davis deal that supposedly is "off the table." I went with Upton because he's younger than the other two and I think the difference in value is worth the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good poll. The options are all pretty close IMO, and all are better than the Davis deal that supposedly is "off the table." I went with Upton because he's younger than the other two and I think the difference in value is worth the pick.
I did the same. I think he has a good chance of being worth his contract and think 6 years is still too many for CD.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote Cespedes. Shortest commitment and keep our picks. We already have Trumbo at 1B but we need an OF who can play good D.

I would also be OK with rolling with Alvarez or Morneau and waiting til next year.

I wouldn't be. But to quote Seinfeld "it's a Cespedes for the rest of us!"

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with Upton. The cost of the pick is IMO not more important than picking the impact player who will have the bigger impact on our team over the next five or six years. I feel that is Upton. My second choice would be Cespedes and third Davis. I think we would hate any long term deal with Davis by year four where as with the other two are likely to provide some value to us through the length of the contract. I prefer all three to doing nothing significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote Cespedes. Shortest commitment and keep our picks. We already have Trumbo at 1B but we need an OF who can play good D.

I would also be OK with rolling with Alvarez or Morneau and waiting til next year.

Exactly who would we sign next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good poll. The options are all pretty close IMO, and all are better than the Davis deal that supposedly is "off the table." I went with Upton because he's younger than the other two and I think the difference in value is worth the pick.

Yeah, that is a tough call. I think a strong argument can be made for Davis. He costs no pick, and has by far the highest offensive ceiling. We're in a position where we have to take some risks, such as Davis having more seasons like 2015 and 2013.

That said, I voted for Upton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upton would look really great in RF and at 6/110 the deal is long enough and cheap enough to warrant losing the pick.

If Upton's price gets closer to the 7/147 that's been projected then I would probably go with Cespedes and keep the pick.

I agree that this is a well-constructed poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upton would look really great in RF and at 6/110 the deal is long enough and cheap enough to warrant losing the pick.

If Upton's price gets closer to the 7/147 that's been projected then I would probably go with Cespedes and keep the pick.

I agree that this is a well-constructed poll.

I'd offer Upton 7/128

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • He is on the 40 man roster as of today. 40-Man Roster | Baltimore Orioles https://www.mlb.com/orioles/roster/40-man
    • We just live in an instant gratification society nowadays so it's not that surprising. The Orioles have won two or three while Holliday takes his lumps so that's the good thing and last night, no matter what he did at the plate they were losing that one. Pitchers are really coming at him with their best stuff and I haven't seen him swing through many hittable pitches. Saying all that, the amount of pure whiff so far has been surprising for sure. Through his first three games he has a 59.1% WHIFF rate and part of that might be the pure amount of pitches he's seen with only six pure fastballs. Welcome to the big league kid. They know who you are, they have your scouting report and statcast data from the major leagues, and they're going to pitch you like a super star until you make the adjustments and become one. Not the start anyone thought he'd have and he probably needs to sit against Hall today since he's typically tough on lefties. He'll get there. It just may take a little more time than we had hoped.
    • 4/18  3 innings 4/23. 5 innings 4/28 replaced by Means and back to the bullpen. 🙂
    • From Roch yesterday: “Manager Brandon Hyde said reliever Yohan Ramírez, acquired from the Mets yesterday for cash considerations, should report to the team within the next few days. “The Orioles will need to make a corresponding move on the 26-man roster.” That certainly doesn’t sound like they’re going to try putting him through waivers right now.  
    • I went to the game as part of a fundraiser for my daughter's school, so I was happy to go.  But it was not fun to watch.  But I need to know from others if it seemed like the Brewers were being a little showboaty or sort of in your face-ish.  One instance in particular makes me ask, before the benches cleared, was in maybe the 4th or 5th inning, the Brewers struck out an Oriole batter on a close pitch with the batter sort of standing stunned in the box when their catcher pops up, bounded a couple leaps in the air (edit - toward his bench) and hurled the ball into the upper deck.  The batter was still in the box.  It all happened fast, but I was kind of stunned.  I haven't seen anything like that. I'm sorry on not having better details our seats were in 81 under cover with no vantage point of the Jumbotron. lol  and other than the phone I had trouble following who was up or any other info about the game in the midst of my daughter talking my ear off the whole time which was, admittedly, the whole reason for going to the game in the first place.  Good night out, terrible game.
    • I’m unclear how the plan to stretch him out would work. 
    • All you say/propose could be correct. But I struggle to see the problem/issue. All players at the professional level are independent contractors at the end of the day. Yes, they want to win and are hyper competitive, but they also want to get paid. He is one year away from receiving generational transforming money and he knows that his performance will determine that. When it comes to him viewing the Orioles as an oasis in a desert, why would he do that? He’s coming from a winning/successful organization and going to another. The Orioles have not done anything on the field (during his tenure as a pro) that is any better than the Brewers. We HOPE that they get there, but they have a long way to go.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...