Jump to content

At What Point, Do You Hold DD Accountable, If Any?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

Last offseason was putrid (most of us realize why).

This offseason is NOT over.

However, let's discuss how you feel as a fan if little else is done. Would you be happy? Disappointed? Apathetic? What would make you be critical of DD? Would you like to see his contract extended? What say you?

No point in being critical of DD since ultimately his hands are tied by the owner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Last offseason was putrid (most of us realize why).

This offseason is NOT over.

However, let's discuss how you feel as a fan if little else is done. Would you be happy? Disappointed? Apathetic? What would make you be critical of DD? Would you like to see his contract extended? What say you?

No point in being critical of DD since ultimately his hands are tied by the owner?

Name a GM that was ever able to get PA to change his mind. Not even Pat Gillick.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last offseason was putrid (most of us realize why).

This offseason is NOT over.

However, let's discuss how you feel as a fan if little else is done. Would you be happy? Disappointed? Apathetic? What would make you be critical of DD? Would you like to see his contract extended? What say you?

No point in being critical of DD since ultimately his hands are tied by the owner?

I hold him and Angelos accountable every day. You have to question the credibility of a GM who doesn't even bother to negotiate to retain our best starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accountable for? One AL East title, another playoff appearance, and no losing seasons in the last four years? That incompetent rat b*st*rd! I'm not thrilled with the void of progress since adding Trumbo and keeping O'Day, but this is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accountable for? One AL East title, another playoff appearance, and no losing seasons in the last four years? That incompetent rat b*st*rd! I'm not thrilled with the void of progress since adding Trumbo and keeping O'Day, but this is silly.

This is pretty much where I'm at. I don't forget how dark the times were before DD, he's a large part of what's happened since.

DD strikes me as a guy who's happy to stand pat when he doesn't like what he sees on the table. That sucks as a fan because there's not much else to get excited about....but if he believes that to be the best strategy moving forward, that's fine. I can't fault someone for not wanting to make what they perceive to be a not smart move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD? Not much really. The owner must approve too. If Pete told DD to go sign whoever it took, I am sure DD would oblige. DD is just living within the owner's wishes

Ehhh, Peter Angelos didn't gut the farm system. Peter Angelos didn't try running to Toronto with more than half his contract still in effect. Peter Angelos didn't sign Ubaldo Jimenez for 4 years. Peter Angelos didn't say that OBP is a top priority of this club...only not make a dent into it whatsoever over his tenure.

Now, what Peter Angelos didn't do? Invest properly in the Cuban market. We have a bunch of dimes when everyone else is getting dollars. If you're going to screw the farm system...you need to do whatever possible to infuse the minors (and eventually the majors with impact talent. The Cubs do this. Why the hell can't the O's?

Also, what Peter Angelos isn't doing is drafting top starting pitcher prospects...only to have every.single.one.of.them fizzle out and/or never make it (or get traded away for relievers or blah outfielders). The last bastion of hope at this point is Kevin Gausman. So what is Duquette doing to do a better job there? Stock it full of AAAA pitchers? Because we don't have any impact arms that aren't hurt or have huge question marks surrounding them because of injury.

Listen, I love that we had 4 years of .500 or better ball under Dan Duquette. But this club was largely architected by Andy MacPhail. I don't want to sell Duquette short as he's done a fine job of finding some diamonds in the rough over the years...but his drafts have been so-so, development under him has been so-so, trades have been bad and his free agent signings have been all over the map.

This offseason and draft is going to define Duquette going forward. It's going to show the baseball world what he can/can't do a mediocre core and a bunch of draft picks with a payroll well over $100m. Because it looks damn bleak right now.

This offseason is a $9m DH in Trumbo, a who knows OF in Kim, a resign of O'Day and a dammitican'tbelieveheacceptedtheQO Matt Wieters....oh and Vance Worley. And a bunch of fringey mehs. I am worried about this club. As constructed they're lucky to win 72.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehhh, Peter Angelos didn't gut the farm system. Peter Angelos didn't try running to Toronto with more than half his contract still in effect. Peter Angelos didn't sign Ubaldo Jimenez for 4 years. Peter Angelos didn't say that OBP is a top priority of this club...only not make a dent into it whatsoever over his tenure.

Now, what Peter Angelos didn't do? Invest properly in the Cuban market. We have a bunch of dimes when everyone else is getting dollars. If you're going to screw the farm system...you need to do whatever possible to infuse the minors (and eventually the majors with impact talent. The Cubs do this. Why the hell can't the O's?

Also, what Peter Angelos isn't doing is drafting top starting pitcher prospects...only to have every.single.one.of.them fizzle out and/or never make it (or get traded away for relievers or blah outfielders). The last bastion of hope at this point is Kevin Gausman. So what is Duquette doing to do a better job there? Stock it full of AAAA pitchers? Because we don't have any impact arms that aren't hurt or have huge question marks surrounding them because of injury.

Listen, I love that we had 4 years of .500 or better ball under Dan Duquette. But this club was largely architected by Andy MacPhail. I don't want to sell Duquette short as he's done a fine job of finding some diamonds in the rough over the years...but his drafts have been so-so, development under him has been so-so, trades have been bad and his free agent signings have been all over the map.

This offseason and draft is going to define Duquette going forward. It's going to show the baseball world what he can/can't do a mediocre core and a bunch of draft picks with a payroll well over $100m. Because it looks damn bleak right now.

This offseason is a $9m DH in Trumbo, a who knows OF in Kim, a resign of O'Day and a dammitican'tbelieveheacceptedtheQO Matt Wieters....oh and Vance Worley. And a bunch of fringey mehs. I am worried about this club. As constructed they're lucky to win 72.

I agree with nearly everything you say here except the 1st sentence. The Orioles farm system has sucked nearly the whole time Angelos was owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehhh, Peter Angelos didn't gut the farm system. Peter Angelos didn't try running to Toronto with more than half his contract still in effect. Peter Angelos didn't sign Ubaldo Jimenez for 4 years. Peter Angelos didn't say that OBP is a top priority of this club...only not make a dent into it whatsoever over his tenure.

This offseason is a $9m DH in Trumbo, a who knows OF in Kim, a resign of O'Day and a dammitican'tbelieveheacceptedtheQO Matt Wieters....oh and Vance Worley. And a bunch of fringey mehs. I am worried about this club. As constructed they're lucky to win 72.

Since when does trading three pitching prospects over 4 pitching prospects over 3 years constitute a "gutting" of the farm system?

And technically yes, Angelos did sign Ubaldo to a 4 year contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accountable for? One AL East title, another playoff appearance, and no losing seasons in the last four years? That incompetent rat b*st*rd! I'm not thrilled with the void of progress since adding Trumbo and keeping O'Day, but this is silly.

From an organization that had zero winning seasons in the 14 years prior to his arrival. I know it's popular to talk about accountability and not accepting failure and expecting excellence and this stuff, but sports is a zero-sum game. But we're fans who have little or no influcence over how the team is run, so us holding Duquette or Angelos accountable is a fiction, it's a conceit. Also, in every year the wins and losses in a league have to equal each other. Half the teams, give or take, are going to have a losing record each and every year. But fans always expect not only wins, but wins the right way that set up more wins in the future.

If you'd asked the Hangout in 2008 what they thought of a future that played out as 2012-2015 did I'd guess 30% of the board would have donated a kidney to science to get to that reality. Now that we're actually there it's a firing offense.

Look, I'm not thrilled about everything, and occasionally confused and perplexed by decisions. But I try to not let pursuit of the ideal stand in the way of enjoying the pretty good. I saw 1985-88 and 1998-2011, I know what bad baseball from a lost organization looks like. It ain't four winning seasons in four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick reminder for all that thrive on negativity. The O's have won more games than any of their AL East opponents over the last 4 years.

That's great and all, but it has only lead to one ALCS where the team was swept. Any momentum they had from that season was killed by DD trying to leave for Toronto and ignoring the team he was employed by

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great and all, but it has only lead to one ALCS where the team was swept. Any momentum they had from that season was killed by DD trying to leave for Toronto and ignoring the team he was employed by

Do you think you put too much into last season on DD?

Seriously, DD dancing with Toronto resulted in Tilly regressing as a pitcher, Hardy getting hurt and every other bad thing that happened last season.

Baseball is sometimes a simple game, and yet, an inch here, a bad hop there, makes all the difference in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...