Jump to content

Mark Trumbo agrees to $9.15 million deal to avoid arbitration


xian4

Recommended Posts

And that's the 6 million dollar question. Where is Trumbo playing? If he's playing first then he has potential for a tiny bit of excess value at 9 million and I'm only mildly agitated that the O's are spending 9 million on him. If Trumbo is mainly the DH, 9 million becomes a pretty big overpay, which is why Seattle moved him.

Based on the current value of a win, in 4 of his 5 years, 9 million for Trumbo would have been a bargain -- and most of them were in the outfield with negative dWAR. Meanwhile, Carter would have been overpaid by quite a bit at $3 million in three of his six seasons, with another season breaking even. History tells us that the odds of Trumbo being worth his contract in 2016 clearly exceed the odds of Carter being worth his. Fortunately, Carter is someone else's problem, and not a concern for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Based on the current value of a win, in 4 of his 5 years, 9 million for Trumbo would have been a bargain -- and most of them were in the outfield with negative dWAR. Meanwhile, Carter would have been overpaid by quite a bit at $3 million in three of his six seasons, with another season breaking even. History tells us that the odds of Trumbo being worth his contract in 2016 clearly exceed the odds of Carter being worth his. Fortunately, Carter is someone else's problem, and not a concern for us.

As I said, if Trumbo is playing defense he's the better option.

Also, paying sub 2-win players FA market rates is not something I'd advocate, but it is only for 1 year. Trumbo's ceiling is league average player, and you're paying basically full market value for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said, if Trumbo is playing defense he's the better option.

Also, paying sub 2-win players FA market rates is not something I'd advocate, but it is only for 1 year. Trumbo's ceiling is league average player, and you're paying basically full market value for it.

I think his (reasonable) ceiling is about three wins. That's where he'd be if he hit like 2012 and spent most of the year at first and put up something like his career +6 UZR/150 there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, paying sub 2-win players FA market rates is not something I'd advocate, but it is only for 1 year. Trumbo's ceiling is league average player, and you're paying basically full market value for it.

This is how I feel. Not a good deal. Not a bad deal. Mediocre one year deals are nothing to freak out over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his (reasonable) ceiling is about three wins. That's where he'd be if he hit like 2012 and spent most of the year at first and put up something like his career +6 UZR/150 there.

2012 looks like a pretty obvious outlier, but I suppose you're right. I'm pegging him for his career 108 wRC+ and averagish defense at first. That's probably a 1.5 win player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also optimistic. I think the 1-2 punch of being traded on the very unusual June 3rd date and Safeco freaked him out and he was on walkabout for a month.

He recovered decently. With respect to him vs. Alvarez and Carter, can't believe the stat I am about to cite here but...

Career batting average:

Trumbo .250

Alvarez .236

Carter .217

Not sure precisely how this maps to the scouting scale, but to me, this is the difference between a 45 bat, a 40 bat, a 30-35 bat.

The closer to the edge of complete major league unplayability your bat teeters, the more likely your power, however colossal, is completely irrelevant.

Especially vs. Carter, I think Trumbo's tremendously more likely to be an effective performer. Alvarez is the middle case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you want your starting 1b or DH to put up a .750 OPS and a 0.8 WAR (a -1.1 WAR the year before)? That puts him about 15-17th in the rankings of 1b.....

Trumbo was worth 1.6 rWAR last year. Half in Arizona and half in Seattle.

2011 - 2.9

2012 - 2.5

2013 - 2.1

2014 - (-1.1)

2015 - 1.6

It's fair to say 2014 is the aberration. It came with a stress fracture in his left foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isnt Trumbo a bench bat at this point? I agree, all things equal you take Trumbo over Carter...but they arent equal, there is a decent sized salary difference

Trumbo is an average starting first baseman in this league, I would say. Carter is a bench bat, especially in the National League where he will be playing in Milwaukee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trumbo is an average starting first baseman in this league, I would say. Carter is a bench bat, especially in the National League where he will be playing in Milwaukee.

Carter is about as good a bat as Trumbo. But he can't really field anywhere, at all, so he takes a huge hit in value. Either he's a pretty poor DH, or a 1B with a big negative glove. In the NL they have to play him in the field, or use him as a PH. So far in his career he's 3-for-26 with 14 Ks and 7 BBs pinch hitting.

Actually, his DH numbers are good. So you could squint and rationalize and pretend the sample size is enough that he's one of those guys who doesn't take a DH penalty. So in the NL he might have outsized value in those handful of road interleague games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$9.15 mm is slightly more than I hoped we'd pay, but not materially more than I expected.

I consider Trumbo to be much better than Chris Carter. I think he'll maul in OPACY.

Let's hope so, because his career numbers at OPACY are a disaster. Granted, that's only 10 games, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Thank you.  Not sure how easy for someone who may have been doing it for years and someone who’s been talented enough to make it work.   Someone posted a video of Freddie Freeman and Holliday to show similarities but, to me, it just showed how different their lead foot was.  Freeman’s was closed and perfectly in line and parallel to his back foot.  Hollidays foot pointed out and the foot towards 2B position.  I questioned it.  Other guys, who admittedly know more, said it was no problem.  Again, he might be able to become a HOF with those mechanics.  I’ve just never seen a good ML hitter hit that way. From that early January thread “I guess it depends on your definition of “step in the bucket”.  His stride foot definitely doesn’t go straight.  Pretty easy to see where his foot is in relation to the batters box and how much further away it is when it lands.  It doesn’t seem to affect him negatively though.  Interestingly enough, Freeman’s stride foot goes perfectly straight.” Edited January 6 by RZNJ
    • He allowed only one batted ball over 95 MPH, commanding his cutter particularly well in this one. I think the cutter is the most critical pitch for Povich to take the next step. He’s never had issues getting punch outs, he needs to be able to pitch in the zone without relying too much on his fastball. It’s also a key weapon against RHP - if you don’t have a true plus breaking ball or fastball that can overcome the platoon splits (which I don’t think Povich does), you can only make it as a LHP SP through the strength of your cutter and changeup, which are more reverse/neutral splits.  His changeup is probably not good enough to carry him on its own, so it’s the cutter that brings the whole pitch mix together.  
    • Agree he steps in the bucket. In theory should be a relatively easy fix. 
    • His back or shoulder might give out first. Hardly any talented pitcher retires without some sort of serious injury recorded.
    • Plus Member  30.8k Posted January 24 Aram Leighton from Just Baseball on Holliday “He has the tendency to pull off of the ball a bit with his front side, which can minimize his ability to use the ground and his lower half to generate more power, especially on pitches on the outer half. The move does not impede his ability to consistently make contact thanks to his adjustability and feel for the barrel. Holliday projects as an easy plus hitter with more juice to tap into.“ https://www.justbaseball.com/prospects/baltimore-orioles-top-15-prospects-for-2024/
    • I guess my point is that the difference between 91 and 93 at the MLB level is probably negligible.  I would put significant emphasis on pitch sequencing, command and control, and the ability to land his secondary pitches.  If I am recalling his repertoire correctly his most important pitch is his change up.  And it was his ability to effectively throw a breaking pitch, I think it was a Slider, that really ushered in his pre-injury success.  Now you can make the case that 2 miles per hours of fastball velocity may make the change up an even more effective pitch.  I would not argue with you about that aspect, however I am not certain it explains much about his previous success.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...