Jump to content

This one's on Trembley


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well, no, but not thinking they can get to the next level is an indictment of sorts.

Again, putting words into my mouth...I have never said they couldn't get us to that next level.

I said their faults could potentially hurt us, therefore talking about them isn't a bad thing.

Just amazing to me the homerism around here sometimes...If everything said isn't pollyanna-ish, you get jumped on. Unreal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just amazing to me the homerism around here sometimes...If everything said isn't pollyanna-ish, you get jumped on. Unreal.

You call me pollyanna ... fine ... you want to rip the manager for his roster management ... go ahead. Of course you know more than they do ... you the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use the word could and your o.k. both ways? Is that how it goes? They could win the World Series this year also.:rolleyes:

No, it means that I am not going to sit on my hands and ignore their faults.

It means that they should be put out there because they could hinder us long term.

Again, if you only want to talk about the "nice things", that's fine but then just don't get involved in the conversations about other things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it means that I am not going to sit on my hands and ignore their faults.

It means that they should be put out there because they could hinder us long term.

Again, if you only want to talk about the "nice things", that's fine but then just don't get involved in the conversations about other things.

First, I'll get involved in any conversations I want. Second, Trembley's faults as far as I can tell have befelled every manager that ever lived. Each manager has made mistakes with their bullpen usage and lineups from time to time. I refuse to look at all the little things and will focus on the direction of the team and his ability to lead the charges.

Well they could hinder us, or they could help us. You don't know any better than the rest of us, even though your sure you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it means that I am not going to sit on my hands and ignore their faults.

It means that they should be put out there because they could hinder us long term.

Again, if you only want to talk about the "nice things", that's fine but then just don't get involved in the conversations about other things.

You're rapidly becoming the New Sapper. You're laying in wait for any little thing you don't like, and then acting like that's somehow big proof that AM and/or DT are idiots. The only criteria seems to be whether or not they agree with you about every little detail. AFAIK, whether you agree with them or not, there's a perfectly reasonable rationale for everything they've done, with the exception of 4/11's BP mystery.

BTW, did DT ever explain what he was thinking? Since HeartMASN made Tony mad and got a vacation, I can't see DT's post-game interviews anymore. Did he explain it? (I don't know if he did or not.)

Anyway, I think you liked it better when we had GM's and managers who weren't as competent as the guys we have now. That made it easier to sell the basic line of "They're all idiots, and therefore SG is smarter then everybody else in baseball." Now that the O's have people in charge who seem clueful, the ambient tone of most people on the board seems more reasonable, and your "what they did is awful" shtick seems to be getting less support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yes. That’s less than 25 million a season on average. Even though the years are a bit long. That’s the going rate for these type of superstar players.  Maybe you can go more AAV in exchange for say a 12 year deal? But at age 22, even at 14 years he’s here until he’s what 37/38? In 10 years 25 mill per won’t be the valued at nearly the same dollar amount in terms of “paying an older possibly declining player”. That contract length also ensures that he is an Oriole for life basically. If Rubenstien’s goal is to restore the franchise’s glory instead of simply making it a competitive franchise. You cannot minimize the value of having these type of franchise cornerstone players/homegrown superstars. We basically haven’t had one (and retained) since Ripken. (Yes I know Machado was one but we let him walk and basically the same with Mussina.)
    • I was looking at the O’s stat page and noticing how high all the OPS+ numbers are.  For example, Cedric Mullins has a .736 OPS but that’s good for a 116 OPS+ right now.  So, I looked around.  Right now, the MLB average OPS is .698.  That’s down from .734 last year, and (for those thinking of a “cold weather” explanation) from .726 last April.    The O’s, on the other hand, have a .780 OPS, compared to .742 last year.  That’s 3rd in MLB and good for an MLB-leading 130 OPS+, compared to 107 last year.    I’m not sure if the hot hitting will continue, but the team has had one heck of a start offensively, in a year where the league has been pretty cold.    
    • I didn’t see Angel Hernandez listed in any of the box scores from yesterday so he may have been the replay official. That would actually be hilarious. 
    • @Tony-OH   It’s early but is Forret possibly a better prospect than DeLeon?  A year younger.  Sounds like velo is similar.  Better control?
    • I wouldn’t hesitate to give him the Witt deal. I would like to get 3 FA years.  That’s my best case scenario and after that, the opt outs start.
    • At this point Gunnar is the most valuable asset in baseball right? I guess you could argue Witt Jr or De La Cruz. I sure as heck wouldn’t trade him for anybody.
    • @Tony-OHhave you had a chance to see or hear anything about Cam Weston yet? Is there real upside or is this an older guy who's maybe more advanced than his league?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...