Jump to content

Orioles acquired RHP Odrisamer Despaigne


TeamSchoop6

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Duquette: ?Despaigne is a solid addition to our pitching staff because of his versatility. Our scouts have liked him for some time."</p>? Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">February 4, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I think they see interesting things regarding his change up.

Sounds like his changeup is 'interesting' - but the League apparently figured out that they just need to lay off of it and wait for the junk fastball.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/theres-nothing-out-there-like-the-odrisamer-despaigne-changeup/

EDIT - realized I found and posted the same link as you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Because they're correctly labeling this guy as mediocre and you disagree?

Command issues, average stuff, doesn't generate a lot of swing and misses. Fine as a depth move, terrible as a "this guy is the savior of our rotation" move.

I don't think anyone is crowning it as anything other than that. I just don't understand casting off a potentially more valuable player to do it. Riefenhauser may have been able to be a solid part of a MLB bullpen. Despaigne is not a solid part of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather keep the guy who could have potentially had use in the bullpen than acquire the guy I know is bad. There is no upside here. Despaigne is not good.

So pretty much we should never trade anyone right? Cosme was as much a middling prospect as any middling prospect can be.

I saw Despaigne pitch a couple times in 2014 and he looked far from bad. Last year his numbers looked ugly but if the Orioles scouts think he has upside, what information are you using to form you opinion that he is bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like his changeup is 'interesting' - but the League apparently figured out that they just need to lay off of it and wait for the junk fastball.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/theres-nothing-out-there-like-the-odrisamer-despaigne-changeup/

Correct. By pitch value his changeup was well below average in 2015, as were all of his offerings but his fastball. Gets ground balls at a decent clip but is completely incapable of missing bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So pretty much we should never trade anyone right? Cosme was as much a middling prospect as any middling prospect can be.

I saw Despaigne pitch a couple times in 2014 and he looked far from bad. Last year his numbers looked ugly but if the Orioles scouts think he has upside, what information are you using to form you opinion that he is bad?

I meant Riefenhauser, not Cosme. Despaigne looked ok in 96 innings in 2014 but the peripherals were still ugly, they got even uglier last year. He's a junkballer who can't miss bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An instantly replaceable prospect in a late draft round or with a cheap international signing or as part of a low-profile trade.

So what does that say about Despaigne, who is still in his pre-arb years, has options, and yet all it took to get him was Cosme? Either Cosme has rocketed up the prospect chart based on what he showed at Aberdeen last year, or the Padres have a very low opinion of Despaigne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wright and Wilson aren't actual prospects to me, I'm not that concerned about their "development". They've already pitched at this level. It makes no difference to me whether Despaigne is getting bombed or Wright or Wilson are taking their lumps in the majors.

Exactly, you can play the whatif game all day long.

At some point, they will play the game on the field, and we will see what they have to show us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what does that say about Despaigne, who is still in his pre-arb years, has options, and yet all it took to get him was Cosme? Either Cosme has rocketed up the prospect chart based on what he showed at Aberdeen last year, or the Padres have a very low opinion of Despaigne.

Seems he was about to be DFAed. SDo immediately used that roster spot on Rodney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Honestly, this almost feels like a positive. Last year an outing like this might have had 4 or 5 walks. Hopefully this indicates a better ability to grind out a start without his best command. 
    • Yea that’s a lot of pitching.  Only 1 walk but the str% was just under 60%.
    • A few ideas:  McKenna has been around for a long time, Roch probably knows him pretty well.   Maybe he likes the guy.  It is a fact that Hyde (and likely Elias too) like to have a good mix of RH and LH bats, and take LH/RH splits very seriously.    We see it in their lineups, and in player moves, all the time.   It is clear based on the multitude of comments that come out each time a lineup is posted, that Hyde/Elias put a lot more stock in LH/RH splits than the majority of fans here do.   Whether you agree with them or not, the bottom line is it DOES matter to THEM, a lot.   And with Hays down, and now Burdick gone, our MLB/AAA pool of potential outfielders is VERY lefthanded, which means that McKenna probably has more value to them than he does in most our minds.   And Roch is just reflecting that value in his blog.   (When Hays got hurt, I wasn't 100% sure his replacement was going to be Kjerstad, I thought there was a chance, based on past behavior of Elias/Hyde, that it could be McKenna to get another RH bat in the mix). Perhaps Cowser has, or will, convince them that he can be an adequate backup CF if something happens to Mullins.   I don't know if that has happened yet.   But with Hays out, and Mateo so far not passing the eye test as a CF, it's possible that McKenna is still the #1 answer if something were to happen to Cedric.   Which gives him more significance than some other 4A guy who can be DFA'd 3 times in a season like Banuelos and pass through waivers or be easily replaced.
    • We smashed him pretty good last year and he’s due for regression. He’s an average pitcher that we should beat. 
    • Yeah, the limited IP so far is small.  But it feels like he's not at the right level of competition. Of course it's also as much competing against himself (pitch shape, location, etc. that the team tracks) as against the hitters too.  Like you mentioned elsewhere, he's younger than DeLeon.
    • I think they’d go with 4 lefties before sending Akin to AAA. If everyone is healthy: SP: Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Means/Irvin RP: Kimbrel, Cano, Coulombe, Perez, Akin, Suárez, Webb/Baumann, Irvin/Means Option: Wells, Tate DFA: Ramirez, Baumann/Webb And then if they want Wells, they either DFA the other of Webb/Baumann or option Akin.  They also have the ability to option Kremer, but he’s really have to pitch poorly for that to happen.
    • With Cowser hitting lefties ok so far, not a lot of reason for McKenna. Mateo has already played CF once as well, so they are covered down with defense in CF and Kjerstad brings a much better bat. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...