Jump to content

Would we be a contender with Gallarado and/or Fowler in the fold for 2016?


Frobby

Would adding Gallardo and/or Fowler make us a contender in 2016?  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. Would adding Gallardo and/or Fowler make us a contender in 2016?

    • We are likely to be a contender with or without Gallardo and Fowler
    • We are not likely to be a contender regardless of whether we have Gallardo and/or Fowler
    • We need both Gallardo and Fowler to be likely to contend
    • We need only Gallardo to be likely to contend
    • We need only Fowler to be likely to contend


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

You know, it's not the offseason I'd have chose but I think as long as a couple pitchers get a groove in the rotation along with at least average performances by the rest of the staff then the offense should be able to make up the difference. But honestly, if Tillman and Gonzalez continue their performance from last season and no one else steps up big time then it's another .500 type of season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our biggest offseason loss is Chen and I think Gallard's acquisition offsets that to some extent.

Trumbo is a huge improvement over Young/Paredes.

Kim HAS to be better than our every day left field carousel, and if not Reimold or Alvarez every day is at least a wash. Id like to see Rickard do something too.

Fowler is an upgrade over Parra and the hole that was there before prior to getting him.

And I still believe Matt Wieters is a huge offensive upgrade over Joseph, though I thoroughly enjoy Joseph.

These two players leave us with no holes and only room to improve certain areas. I would still have concerns that a team with 5 #3 pitchers cannot be successful. Pray for the best, we can only hope for optimal outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our biggest offseason loss is Chen and I think Gallard's acquisition offsets that to some extent.

Trumbo is a huge improvement over Young/Paredes.

Kim HAS to be better than our every day left field carousel, and if not Reimold or Alvarez every day is at least a wash. Id like to see Rickard do something too.

Fowler is an upgrade over Parra and the hole that was there before prior to getting him.

And I still believe Matt Wieters is a huge offensive upgrade over Joseph, though I thoroughly enjoy Joseph.

These two players leave us with no holes and only room to improve certain areas. I would still have concerns that a team with 5 #3 pitchers cannot be successful. Pray for the best, we can only hope for optimal outcomes.

If they pitch like five no. 3 starters, they'll be very successful. The worries are that they'll pitch like two no. 3's and then three no. 4-5's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team will compete if they get average starting pitching. The rest of this team is good enough.

This is probably a top 2 or 3 defense in the league.

This is probably a ~5 offense, w Fowler.

This is probably a top 3 bullpen.

Average starting pitching is all they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • There are a few problems. One, Scott has regressed big time. He can't make shots at all. Young has a bit too, although he had a big game against Penn State. Those two need to score a lot if this team wants to do anything.  The team has zero depth. None of the freshmen have looked that good. Kaiser finally made some big shots tonight, but has struggled mightily. Same thing with Harris-Smith, he has struggled big time. We are counting on those two being impact players right away, and it doesn't look like they are. Lamothe doesn't get any playing time. There is no one off the bench that is good. Batchelor sort of sucks. Losing Martinez and Hart hurt a lot, they both brought energy and scoring. Long brings a little, but his game is limited. The good news is the season is still young. The losses against Davidson and UAB were bad without a doubt. Aside from that they don't have any bad losses. If they had lost against Penn State at home, which they almost did, that would have been trouble.  Julian Reese looks to have improved a lot, I will say that. He is not good at the free throw line, but he is a monster rebounder and can score around the hoop. Finally, 3 point shooting- they suck. Like really bad. Willard needs to recruit some shooters badly. If the freshmen improve and Scott finds his game, this team will get better. But I don't have any large hopes for this year. If they make the tournament as an 8-10 that would be a small miracle. 
    • Let us have our fun and hope for the worst possible outcome.   Soto was DRS  -4 and OAA -9 playing LF last year.  We can only hope it gets even worse in NY.   Surprisingly, his 35 homers show an expected home run total of only 27 if playing all games in Yankee Stadium.   In old Yankee stadium they used to call LCF Death Valley.  I guess it’s still kind of big out there.   Good luck in NY, Juan.  NOT!
    • It's still a great trade and the Yankees have deep enough pockets to replenish their pitching with FAs. It doesn't reak of desperation at all to me. Literally every team should have been calling the Padres about Soto when they put him on the market because players "that good" are rarely ever available. 
    • Back the truck up for Elias and Sig. 
    • It’s like the Yankees have a crystal ball with a look into their future with Soto and Stanton on the same roster. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...