Jump to content

Orioles interested in Shields?


paulcoates

Recommended Posts

I don't really understand that logic. The NL is the easier league for pitchers, especially at San Diego's cavernous park. So if anything, Shields should've improved (or at least stayed about the same) by moving to the NL last year.
Of course this is correct.

He outperformed his FIP despite the Padres' outfield defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If the O's starting pitching is really as bad in the regular season as it looks now, then trading for Shields would be throwing good money after bad. This team is going nowhere with or without Shields if they don't have any other decent starters.

Maybe the O's should wait until the deadline and see whether one good starter would make a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really understand that logic. The NL is the easier league for pitchers, especially at San Diego's cavernous park. So if anything, Shields should've improved (or at least stayed about the same) by moving to the NL last year.

Shields had a SIERA of 3.73 and xFIP of 3.70 last year. The guy's HR/FB% rate last year was 17.6%. That is a flukishly high HR/FB% especially from a pitcher who has a career HR/FB% of 11.7%. If his HR/FB% was even close to his career norms last year, his ERA (and FIP) would have looked a lot better than it was.

You could also make a case that the porous Padres defense behind Shields played a major role in his poor season last year. Shields might have been less reluctant to put the ball in play, started to nibble a lot more, got behind hitters and that's where all the gopher balls came from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shields had a SIERA of 3.73 and xFIP of 3.70 last year. The guy's HR/FB% rate last year was 17.6%. That is a flukishly high HR/FB% especially from a pitcher who has a career HR/FB% of 11.7%. If his HR/FB% was even close to his career norms last year, his ERA (and FIP) would have looked a lot better than it was.

You could also make a case that the porous Padres defense behind Shields played a major role in his poor season last year. Shields might have been less reluctant to put the ball in play, started to nibble a lot more, got behind hitters and that's where all the gopher balls came from.

Or he could just be bad. Now that he is older. It is much easier. Much to pitch to eight batters than nine. Your HR rate goes down if you are good and you go to a big park and are out of the AL East. Granted, the AL West is not that hard, but he was not an Ace there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shields had a SIERA of 3.73 and xFIP of 3.70 last year. The guy's HR/FB% rate last year was 17.6%. That is a flukishly high HR/FB% especially from a pitcher who has a career HR/FB% of 11.7%. If his HR/FB% was even close to his career norms last year, his ERA (and FIP) would have looked a lot better than it was.

You could also make a case that the porous Padres defense behind Shields played a major role in his poor season last year. Shields might have been less reluctant to put the ball in play, started to nibble a lot more, got behind hitters and that's where all the gopher balls came from.

There's also the difference in the feel of the mound from stadium to stadium that can affect a pitcher. They all have their own character and feel that makes no two mounds the same and all were practically new to him.

Point being, the change in performance happened at the same time his scenery changed. That's why he gets the benefit of the doubt from me. He still threw 200 innings and still had an ERA under four despite all the home

runs and also led the league in starts for the third straight year. It's too soon to say he is in decline. His K/9 was way up despite his other struggles. It is a a "flukish" season as you put it for the time being all things considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the O's starting pitching is really as bad in the regular season as it looks now, then trading for Shields would be throwing good money after bad. This team is going nowhere with or without Shields if they don't have any other decent starters.

Maybe the O's should wait until the deadline and see whether one good starter would make a difference.

Well that logic makes no sense. Assume that adding a starter isn't gonna help and don't add another but if it is then trade for one at the break? Pretty sure ownership and management isn't looking to throw in the towel and the money we've invested to just assume a losing season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why "thank goodness"? Considering our offense is excellent but our rotation appears shaky, Shields could be the difference between making or missing the playoffs.

I think that with Shields returning to the AL East that he would not be that kind of difference maker in 2016 particularly given our multiple weaknesses in the rotation and the contract is awful and I would not send Walker away just yet.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that logic makes no sense. Assume that adding a starter isn't gonna help and don't add another but if it is then trade for one at the break? Pretty sure ownership and management isn't looking to throw in the towel and the money we've invested to just assume a losing season.

Getting an expensive but good starter makes sense if you have 2-3 other good starters, because it could make the difference between making the playoffs and not.

Getting an expensive but good starter makes no sense if you have zero other good starters, because then it will only make the difference between finishing 4th and finishing 5th.

By May or June we'll have a better idea which situation the O's are in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting an expensive but good starter makes sense if you have 2-3 other good starters, because it could make the difference between making the playoffs and not.

Getting an expensive but good starter makes no sense if you have zero other good starters, because then it will only make the difference between finishing 4th and finishing 5th.

By May or June we'll have a better idea which situation the O's are in.

Gausman and Tillman could be good starters this season.

Gallardo is a wildcard right now. Historically a good starter, not looking like much of one so far.

Does shields make a difference? Not sure, but with our offense........he might.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
    • Why carry four 1 inning guys over a LH long option? Cionel stinks and should not be on the roster over Povich when you still have Akin, Coulombe and Soto.
    • Really would be nice to win tonight OR have DET lose so then they can play around Sat/Sun when the games would have no bearing on the seeding. Dont want this to come down to Sunday and having to win to get the 4 seed or then there will be some tough decisions that have to be made.
    • Looking for a big performance from him next week. This is why he’s here. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...