Jump to content

PED Suspensions Coming


Sessh

Recommended Posts

Uggh. Let's clear up a few things.
  • Clenbuterol is an effective PED. It's a muscle builder and fat burner. It's a Hollywood skinny drug. It's used in steroid stacks very effectively. It's most well-known use is for when bodybuilders go from building bulk to preparing for a show.
  • There is no good reason for it to be in cold/flu medicine. It causes body temperature to go up. That said, its legal use in the US is for horses with asthma.:rolleyes:
  • More likely, you'd have Clen in a cold/flu medicine because the medicine would, in theory, counter some of the side effects of the clen. Or, it'd be sold under the guise of cold/flu medication when the real purpose was as a fat burner/muscle builder.
  • Clen clears the system in 24-48 hours. It is exactly the kind of PED players would cycle right before they had to report. And with the earlier testing period catching players this year, we shouldn't be surprised someone got caught using it.
  • The deduction to 50 games from 80 games wasn't because MLB was nice under the circumstances that Mondesi didn't 'knowingly' cheat. I'm sure the testers believe he did knowingly cheat. It was simply a result of following the negotiated rules. If he were an Olympic athlete, for example, the rules would've been a two year ban from international competition. I'm sure he's glad he has a union right now.
Good concise summary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last post came across too much like I'm claiming to already be an expert. I'm not... just an 'expert' googler. :)

I'm well-read on the subject of PED's, as it's a sore subject for me. But I just read up on Clenbuterol over the last day. I'm not trying to prove anything with my post. Instead I encourage anyone who is interested to google it and read up from some steroid-centric sites concerning how Clen is used. Draw your own conclusions; or don't.

What do the negotiated rules say about cold meds? Why would there be any leniency because that was the source? Do you know?

Nothing specific on Cold Meds.

General PED MLB stuff:

Burden of proof of a positive test is on the commissioner's office. They have to prove that the test was positive and that all the agreed upon procedures and chain-of-custody stuff was followed to a tee.

Mitigation:

If there are mitigating circumstances such as:

If a Player proves by clear and convincing

evidence that he bears no significant fault or negligence for the

presence of the Performance Enhancing Substance in his test result, the

Arbitration Panel may reduce the mandated suspension set forth in

Section 7.A, subject to the following: (i) the Panel may not reduce the

penalty for a first-time violation to fewer than 40 games...

Below that section, there is a list of drugs for which there can be no reduction from the 80-games. Clenbuterol is on the banned list, but not on the no-reduction list.

http://mlb.mlb.com/pa/pdf/jda.pdf

Edited by TakebackOPACY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uggh. Let's clear up a few things.
  • Clenbuterol is an effective PED. It's a muscle builder and fat burner. It's a Hollywood skinny drug. It's used in steroid stacks very effectively. It's most well-known use is for when bodybuilders go from building bulk to preparing for a show.
  • There is no good reason for it to be in cold/flu medicine. It causes body temperature to go up. That said, its legal use in the US is for horses with asthma.:rolleyes:
  • More likely, you'd have Clen in a cold/flu medicine because the medicine would, in theory, counter some of the side effects of the clen. Or, it'd be sold under the guise of cold/flu medication when the real purpose was as a fat burner/muscle builder.
  • Clen clears the system in 24-48 hours. It is exactly the kind of PED players would cycle right before they had to report. And with the earlier testing period catching players this year, we shouldn't be surprised someone got caught using it.
  • The deduction to 50 games from 80 games wasn't because MLB was nice under the circumstances that Mondesi didn't 'knowingly' cheat. I'm sure the testers believe he did knowingly cheat. It was simply a result of following the negotiated rules. If he were an Olympic athlete, for example, the rules would've been a two year ban from international competition. I'm sure he's glad he has a union right now.

Awesome post. And people still think the game is clean. Just from this thread I've learned that this cutting steroid leaves your system in 24-48 hours and testosterone in a night's sleep. Players have to be really stupid or really unlucky to get caught.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last post came across too much like I'm claiming to already be an expert. I'm not... just an 'expert' googler. :)

I'm well-read on the subject of PED's, as it's a sore subject for me. But I just read up on Clenbuterol over the last day. I'm not trying to prove anything with my post. Instead I encourage anyone who is interested to google it and read up from some steroid-centric sites concerning how Clen is used. Draw your own conclusions; or don't.

Nothing specific on Cold Meds.

General PED MLB stuff:

Burden of proof of a positive test is on the commissioner's office. They have to prove that the test was positive and that all the agreed upon procedures and chain-of-custody stuff was followed to a tee.

Mitigation:

If there are mitigating circumstances such as:

Below that section, there is a list of drugs for which there can be no reduction from the 80-games. Clenbuterol is on the banned list, but not on the no-reduction list.

http://mlb.mlb.com/pa/pdf/jda.pdf

OK that clears it up. "If a Player proves by clear and convincing

evidence that he bears no significant fault or negligence for the

presence of the Performance Enhancing Substance in his test result, the

Arbitration Panel may reduce the mandated suspension set forth in

Section 7.A, subject to the following: (i) the Panel may not reduce the

penalty for a first-time violation to fewer than 40 games..." If that's the agreement then that's what happened. Still it was dumb for the MLBPA to agree to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll never understand it. Every baseball player who gets caught is a villain forever.

Ray Lewis reportedly uses a banned substance for several years and I hear a few jokes about it for a day and it's never mentioned again. He's still worshipped.

Nor will I. Fans of other sports just want to see the players play and be entertained with their competitive sport of choice. They don't sweat the small stuff. I wish baseball could be that way, but it never will be again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uggh. Let's clear up a few things.
  • The deduction to 50 games from 80 games wasn't because MLB was nice under the circumstances that Mondesi didn't 'knowingly' cheat. I'm sure the testers believe he did knowingly cheat. It was simply a result of following the negotiated rules. If he were an Olympic athlete, for example, the rules would've been a two year ban from international competition. I'm sure he's glad he has a union right now.
Royals top prospect Raul Mondesi Jr. has received a 50-game suspension after testing positive for the banned substance Clenbuterol, the league announced today. The son of the former big league outfielder of the same name, Mondesi saw his suspension dropped from 80 games to 50 games after the league and the MLBPA showed that the substance was present in a cold medication which Mondesi had taken, tweets Joel Sherman of the New York Post.

..

Quinn points out (links to Twitter) that Mondesi Jr. is the first player to receive a reduced suspension ? a possibility that was added to the latest drug agreement. Had he tested positive for a stronger substance, the reduction wouldn?t have been possible, but Clenbuterol is specifically listed among the substances for which a [suspension] can be reduced if lack of intent can be proven.

Source

Lack of intent was proven. Lack of intent means MLB believes he did not knowingly or intentionally ingest this substance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll never understand it. Every baseball player who gets caught is a villain forever.

Ray Lewis reportedly uses a banned substance for several years and I hear a few jokes about it for a day and it's never mentioned again. He's still worshipped.

Eh. The Ray Lewis thing was sort of a tabloid story. Apparently the deer antler spray contains a hormone that's banned, but far lower than the test threshold. Like, lower than the amount you get from eating eggs and drinking milk low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. The Ray Lewis thing was sort of a tabloid story. Apparently the deer antler spray contains a hormone that's banned, but far lower than the test threshold. Like, lower than the amount you get from eating eggs and drinking milk low.

So, the hormone is IGF-1, its naturally occurring, but the synthetic form is banned, I guess. My understanding is that deer antler spray is essentially snake oil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Football players and Basket ball players are already gargantuan. Baseball players are relatively normal looking. So when they start looking like football players it is noticeable. Why did Congress focus on PEDs in the MLB? Because it was more obvious. And there was the whole stats thing.

Also the fact that baseball enjoys an antitrust exemption not provided to the NFL or NBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh look, a JoeyBats sighting...

“If anything, I’m more concerned about the integrity of the (league’s drug-testing) program and what can be done to make sure that those systems that are in place are fully transparent and human error is taken into account,”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Football players and Basket ball players are already gargantuan. Baseball players are relatively normal looking. So when they start looking like football players it is noticeable. Why did Congress focus on PEDs in the MLB? Because it was more obvious. And there was the whole stats thing.

I think PED is most obvious in football, myself. I would guess that the majority of players are on something. I just don't understand why in football no one cares and in baseball it's treated as some sort of heinous crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...