Jump to content

Loewen to DL, Torres Recalled


dkdc

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Beat me to it. Unless someone here has talked to MacPhail or Trembley so that they might at least try to understand the reasoning, it's ridiculous of them to just outright slam the move here. Torres is hitting much better than Terrero who has gone into a major funk and seen his average drop over 100 points in the last couple of weeks. We have a right handed fourth outfielder, in Payton - who has performed exceptionally well in that role, by the way - but our only utility infielder, Fahey, is a lefty. So, bringing up a right handed utility infielder makes much more sense than a career AAAA outfielder. Especially when the infielder is hitting better than the outfielder. And, if Roberts is traded, Torres could become our starting second baseman for the rest of the season, so this gives the brain trust a chance to see him more before that happens. And, since Loewen's spot in the rotation doesn't come up for four days, they have plenty of time to make a move related to pitching.

All the doom and gloomers should take a deep breath and realize that who the 25th man on the roster is will not be a make or break decision this season and move on.

Why is this always the response? Personally, I like it when my team makes smart decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to be addressed is Greg Aquino... who is this years Scott Williamson. Aquino has been in 5 games for 6 innings so far this year.

What is up with that? DT just does not go to him. He's basically mop up until a better option comes along. I guess the better option is at AAA right now but since we're trying to bring the young guys along slowly, they are just going to leave Aquino in that role. Maybe by June that will change.

Not to hijack the thread, but if things go as hoped and expected, this staff will be undergoing a major overhaul in the next year. Penn, Olson, Liz, McCrory and maybe Spoone and Hoey could all pitch for the O's by the end of the year. Patton will be here next year. Aquino, Trax and Burres should be losing jobs in a couple of months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the amount of close games we've been in. DT clearly doesn't trust him. Maybe they are hoping some side sessions improve his control and quality of pitches. But I agree, it is baffling why he is still here if they don't trust him. He's just taking up space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One good thing about having Torres around is that it might lead to some days off for Roberts. Of course, Fahey could have given him a breather; but maybe DT will feel more comfortable with Torres in that role.

They also need to find a way to get Mora some rest. I hope Aubrey is taking some ground ball practice.

It's obvious...we are too good.

We don't need no stinking bench players.

We obviously are playing with an arm tied behind our back to make it fair. That is is why Millar and Huff keep giving back runs...just so that it stays exciting. We are a team of destiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who takes the place of Loewen in the rotation? Albers? Johnson? Olson?

We will find out tonight. Olson is supposed to start for Norfolk so if he is scratched before the start or gets pulled after 2-3 innings it is nearly safe to assume that Olson will get the call on Tuesday.

With Trax and Burres going the next 2 days, Albers and Johnson may not be rested by the time Tuesday come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will find out tonight. Olson is supposed to start for Norfolk so if he is scratched before the start or gets pulled after 2-3 innings it is nearly safe to assume that Olson will get the call on Tuesday.

With Trax and Burres going the next 2 days, Albers and Johnson may not be rested by the time Tuesday come.

This was my thought as well. If Albers is slotted for Tuesday, then he won't be available out of the pen. If both Buress and Trax have melt downs the pen could be burned out fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torres is a pretty good player. Better than Fahey. I'm sure Garret Olson will be taking Loewen's spot in the rotation and when we call up Olson, we will send down Fahey. I'd rather have torres than fahey

Agreed. This makes perfect sense if the following is the plan:

1. Use Torres for speed off the bench and give him a couple of looks in the field to see if he's preferable to Fahey / LH moving forward.

2. Call up Olson when Loewen's turn is next due and option either Fahey or LH down.

Calling up Olson immediately would basically be a waste of a roster spot for 4 days (what's a starting pitcher going to do to help the club between starts?).

Torres isn't that great at stealing bases (66% success in 33 attempts last season) but he immediately becomes the best pinch running option on the team. At least he's not total dead weight offensively on the bench like Fahey / LH is when they don't start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the doom and gloomers should take a deep breath and realize that who the 25th man on the roster is will not be a make or break decision this season and move on.

In a related note, AM has decided to go with a 23 man roster to avoid the difficult decision of who to waste the final spots on.

If selected properly, all 25 men can actually contribute to a ball club. Having 3 SS who can't hit isn't a way to do that. Calling up Torres is fine if it's coupled with other moves to remove other dead weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the rushing to judgment, when this is obviously not the only move that will be made. I think it is safe to assume that AM and DT don't plan on having all 3 of Torres, LH and Fahey on the roster for any real amount of time. We didn't need to replace Loewen, today. Aquino is the pitcher that should be getting replaced today. Moore isn't hitting his weight so why reward him with a call to sit on the bench?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the rushing to judgment, when this is obviously not the only move that will be made. I think it is safe to assume that AM and DT don't plan on having all 3 of Torres, LH and Fahey on the roster for any real amount of time. We didn't need to replace Loewen, today. Aquino is the pitcher that should be getting replaced today. Moore isn't hitting his weight so why reward him with a call to sit on the bench?

Thank you for having rare good judgement on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not gonna keep LH, Fahey, and Torres. This is just a momentary roster juggling thing to buy a few days until they do something else. I don't see what people are getting all worked up about.

Look at it this way: Now they can PH for both LH and Fahey, and still have another MI to run in there ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...