Jump to content

Jayson Stark: Competition Committee Agree's to Changes to Strike Zone, IBB's


Elbren

Recommended Posts

Surprised, I didn't see this posted yet.

Sources: Competition committee agrees to changes to strike zone, intentional walks

The potentially dramatic changes could be in effect by next season.

The committee agreed on a motion to effectively raise the lower part of the strike zone to the top of the hitter's knees, sources said. The current rules stipulate that the zone begins at "the hollow beneath the kneecap," but the change is a reaction to a trend by umpires to call strikes on an increasing number of pitches below the knees.

The change in the intentional-walk rule would end the traditional practice of requiring the pitcher to lob four balls outside the strike zone. Instead, a team could signify it wants to issue an intentional walk, and the hitter would be immediately sent to first base, sources said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't but I eagerly await you sharing your wealth of knowledge with the rest of us.

After every game the home plate umpire gets reviewed on the job they did.

The lowering of the strike zone is a direct result of that practice increasing the Umpires' accuracy.

The perceived need to change the strike zone is therefor a direct result of the Umps being willing to accept critical feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't like the intentional walk change. It just seems like it cheapens things. I know it won't affect things too much, but it seems goofy to me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I like the very occasional wild pitch on an IBB.

I also like when the pitcher, after issuing the IBB can't find the strike zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't like the intentional walk change. It just seems like it cheapens things. I know it won't affect things too much, but it seems goofy to me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ive felt they should have made this intentional walk changes years ago. Its just silly to sit there and throw 4 meaningless pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive felt they should have made this intentional walk changes years ago. Its just silly to sit there and throw 4 meaningless pitches.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a6YzVvtxoaY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I think that it's like kicking an extra point. Has to be done. But I'm an old curmudgeon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a6YzVvtxoaY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I think that it's like kicking an extra point. Has to be done. But I'm an old curmudgeon.

Ill be honest, Ive always wondered why more batters didnt swing. Ive thot they oughta swing at at least 2 after 3 balls just to make the pitcher throw more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a6YzVvtxoaY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I think that it's like kicking an extra point. Has to be done. But I'm an old curmudgeon.

Only two guys I ever saw do that. Miggy and Vlad Guerrero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Elite players is what win titles, for the most part. Get as many elite guys as you can. Stars and scrubs is and always will be the best way to build a roster (although that name is misleading because scrubs really just means cheap player and cheap player doesn’t mean scrub..but it gets the point across).
    • So you believe Cowser has well below average power because that’s what 10-15 is?
    • I'd rather pass on Cease and keep Norby, Ortiz, Kjerstad and Cowser in the system.   I know you have to give up value to get value.  But the cost to acquire good starting pitching in terms of money and prospects has inflated so astronomically that I start to wonder if we might just be better off auditioning Povich, McDermott, Seth Johnson, Cole Irvin and seeing if anyone can stick...?     I'd probably be willing to part with Beavers, Wagner, Fabian, Stowers and I can see maybe trading one top guy (but not Mayo, Holliday or Basallo).
    • Let’s use the Orioles 2023 season as a general case study and compare with a study I learned about via well known journalist and author, Malcolm Gladwell, Revisionist History podcast. (Season 1,  Episode 6, “My Little Hundred Million”. )   https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/revisionist-history/id1119389968?i=1000372836942   At minute 12:15 or so, Gladwell discusses whether it is a greater help to a sports team if the worst player on the roster is replaced with a better player or if the team brings in an even better player as its top star.  That is, does it help more to strengthen your strongest link or your weakest link? His conclusion is: It depends on the sport. In basketball one player can dominate the court in offense and defense. So improve your top player. In soccer, a tital team sport improve the weakest player.   It set me thinking is baseball a strong link or weak link sport?   It seems that in constructing the 2023 roster, Elias, whether intentionally or not, used the improve the weakest links strategy.    Gibson replaced Lyles McCann replaced Benboom Frazier replaced Odor.  Additional improvements occurred with adjusting playing time levels of players in the organization for both 22 and 23.  The result was a stellar 101 win season!   The Orioles 2023 regular season experience suggests that baseball is a strengthen the weakest links sport.    But then the playoffs. The consensus seems to be we lacked the superstar who can carry the team.    It seems that baseball in the playoffs is more of a strong link sport.    So, to put it together, the 2023 Orioles season experience suggests that the regular season is improved with an improve the weak link strategy. While playoffs often need a superstar.    So, if this theory holds true, do the Orioles need to specifically add more proven All Star level players or do we simply depend upon the hope that one of these years we will have a good player get hot at just the right time?
    • Anyone considered for extention has insurance for that case.  Nothing like an extention for sure but I know the family of a top 5 pick who carried a $10m insurance policy in college prior to being drafted.  Any agent at that level should have his clients insured.
    • Looking at which numbers?
    • That's the whole point.  Other teams aren't going to give up more in players/prospects than the Yankees gave up AND pay Soto $33 million.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...