Jump to content

62 Games Down, 100 Left to Play


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

Posted

o

With the Orioles having a day off, I was hoping that perhaps Frobby could do a synopsis of the first 62 games of the season and/or a prediction/forecast of the final 100 games.

He often does them at the 1/3 mark (54 games), the 1/2 mark (81 games), the All-Star break, the 100-game mark, etc.

And of course, it would be great for others to chime in as well :) (Frobby's mailbox is full, hence the reason why I started the thread.)

Posted

Here's a quick projection. If we can get 3 QS out of each turn of the rotation(20 left) then we can win at least 60 of those games. Our offense has consistently won more games than we have gotten QS the past few years. The problem is so far we have only gotten 2.01 QS per turn.

Posted

To be honest, between my "a look at the Orioles, by month" thread, and the "ten games at a time" thread, and wildcard's 1/3 of the season thread and .901 OPS in June thread, there's just not much more to say. We're on a 94-win pace, 3rd in runs/game, starter ERA 4.84 12th in the league. 100 games to go and I have no idea what's going to happen next.

Posted

The Os have benefited from a schedule that has them playing the least number of road games in the AL (27) and tied with only Milwaukee in the NL at that number. KC has already played 36 away games and KC has, I believe, the top HOME winning % in the AL.

I would hope our FO makes a move sooner than later for at least one SP though with the weak state of our farm system I expect we can be outbid for most anyone of quality - though I think our FO is "all in" competing wise and that we would throw every minor leaguer in our system in a deal if that is what it took. Reyes, Sisco, Harvey, Bundy, Mountcastle - we might be able to get someone pretty decent. We'll see. I just don't believe in the current SP rotation and it's ability to keep us in a pennant race.

Posted
The Os have benefited from a schedule that has them playing the least number of road games in the AL (27) and tied with only Milwaukee in the NL at that number. KC has already played 36 away games and KC has, I believe, the top HOME winning % in the AL.

I would hope our FO makes a move sooner than later for at least one SP though with the weak state of our farm system I expect we can be outbid for most anyone of quality - though I think our FO is "all in" competing wise and that we would throw every minor leaguer in our system in a deal if that is what it took. Reyes, Sisco, Harvey, Bundy, Mountcastle - we might be able to get someone pretty decent. We'll see. I just don't believe in the current SP rotation and it's ability to keep us in a pennant race.

I don't think you're alone in that assement. Hopefully Gallardo can pitch decently behind Tillman and Gausman (who of course still has upside). If we can acquire a #3 ish starter that might do the trick but I shudder to think of what little we'd have left on the farm.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Any flexibility for AR and TON leaving, would almost certainly be eaten up by the increases in the other guys' Arb salaries.  And you're also walking into Gunnar's last season of control, so has he been extended?  Or do you trade him? I'm not saying you can't sign Burnes.  But I am saying if you want to keep payroll under 200 mil, and still be a competitive team, he better be pitching at a high level for the salary he's projected to be making.
    • Good post. We might be able to add one or two elite guys but there isn't much margin for error if they turn into a bad contract. You have to believe that next year is "the year" and Burnes is the guy to deliver the title.  After '27 you would have Rutschman and O'Neil expiring along with potentially Castillo if we got him instead of Burnes. So there would be some flexibility to retool in '28, but we would need to replace those guys with new talent. 
    • This is good work and I think that 100 million is a good ballpark area of what the payroll can look like for just those players. 
    • We got Eflin from the Rays and took on $18M in salary in a similar buy trade to what I am proposing. This has nothing to do with the Rays model. 
    • Yayyy they will become the TB Rays. I respect them but how many titles have they won? You know the answer to that. Zero.  41 years is long enough. 
    • Obviously the main talk on the board right now is about adding free agents, with Burnes being the most discussed.  Now, one of the main arguments for signing a big free agent is the team is young, cheap and nobody is making much money yet.  This is all true.  However, that is set to change and change fairly quickly.  I've run some numbers to demonstrate what the payroll will look like in 2027, without any extensions.  I don't claim to be an expert on this so if I made a mistake regarding years, or if you think my projection is faulty, by all means say so.  But these are the numbers as I've calculated them; I chose middle projections, so the individual projections could be higher or lower. Position Players Rutschman (Arb 3) 17 million Holliday (Arb 1) 5 million Henderson (Arb 2) 13 million Westburg (Arb 2) 8 million Cowswer (Arb 2) 8 million Kjerstad (Arb 1) 5 million O'Neill (FA contracts) 16.5 million Pitchers Bradish  (Arb 3) 8 million Rodriguez (Arb 2) 7 million Bautista (Arb 3) 12 million That's 100 million dollars for 10 players.  Now, I think you can project some guys to be on that team that won't be in arb yet.  That's Basallo, Mayo (though he might be), and  Bradfield.  On the pitching side, Povich and there are some others, like Cano and McDermmott, for instance, but I didn't project them out b/c pitching is so volatile and I'm not sure they're core pieces. Conclusions: So they have 100  million dollars laid out here.  The positional side looks solid still, though they need to be figuring out what they're going to do on the other side of this first group of prospects- Rutschman, Henderson, Westburg, Cowser.  They're going to have to trade them, which is a lot of talent going out the door, or extend them, which will increase their salaries significantly, and that's with another wave of guys, Basallo, Mayo and EBJ set to enter arbitration themselves. The pitching side is pretty thin.  Now, again, I haven't projected out some guys presently in the org who could reasonably be on that staff, but at best it is probably 2-3 guys in AAA or above. Now, this might bolster people's arguments to sign Burnes; I'm not sure it does but I could see that.  It might bolster people's arguments they need to start focusing on pitching in the draft; likewise, I'm not sure it does but I could see that too. People are going to argue about what payroll should look like- 150 vs 200 million.  That's par for the course. But what I think this should demonstrate is if they sign a Burnes, or take on Castillo, that's pretty much it.  They aren't the Yankees and they don't have room for two of those contracts- not if they want to remain competitive after 2027.  And if that contract doesn't work out, they're in serious trouble.  They just can't spend their way out of trouble. Now some people seem fine with focusing on 2025-2027, and that's the window.  I firmly believe Elias has a longer window than that, and I'm ok with that, but that is something else someone might want to argue. We all acknowledge payroll is going to go up, but I thought we should see what it actually looks like and put a number to it.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...