Jump to content

Friday, May 2nd @ Angels


Palmer Esque

Recommended Posts

Say what you want about Palmer, but he's a legitimate know-it-all.

I appreciate that even more when he's replaced by a guy who works way too hard every AB to try to sound like he is.

Speak for yourself. I need an analyst to remind me that the home team bats in the bottom of the inning. Without Buck I might lose track of which infielder is the second baseman and which is the shortstop.

Doesn't baseball a need a John Madden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well, the Dynamic Duo asked AM a lot of nothing questions... let's see if they do any better after the commercial...

Nope, they managed to do worse...

  • How about expanded rosters in Apr instead of Sept?
  • How about the crazy schedule?
  • This weekend in CHI, neither team is at home, what's up with that?
  • With Olson up, are there any other P's at AAA who you're watching?

That may be the lamest so-called interview of a GM I ever heard...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you want about Palmer, but he's a legitimate know-it-all.

I appreciate that even more when he's replaced by a guy who works way too hard every AB to try to sound like he is.

I understand what you mean about Buck, but I'd rather have him or even OldFan#5 calling the game instead of Hunter...he hasnt called many games lately has he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Hernandez running on contact? Ahh, I can't watch the game until the Nats are done. Good job by Roberts to get those guys in scoring position, and way to go to the 2-3 hitters to bring 'em home.

Hernandez was running on contact, because it was 2 out.

Weaver nearly drills Huff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speak for yourself. I need an analyst to remind me that the home team bats in the bottom of the inning. Without Buck I might lose track of which infielder is the second baseman and which is the shortstop.

Doesn't baseball a need a John Madden?

I understand what you mean about Buck, but I'd rather have him or even OldFan#5 calling the game instead of Hunter...he hasnt called many games lately has he?

Different jobs:

  • Thorne or Hunter are the play-by-play guys. Their job is to describe what's going on.
  • Palmer and ole Buckaroo are color guys. Their job is to explain what it means, tell you what to look for, etc.

Thorne is better than Hunter, except for goofing up names.

Palmer is way, way, way better than Buck.

Both of these just my opinion, of course...

I predict with certainty that, with DCab pitching tomorrow, Buck will say that DCab has "more moving parts" just because he's tall. He says it every time, usually more than once. And it's not true. DCab has exactly the same number of moving parts. But I guarantee he'll say it anyway. Anybody wanna bet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification.: Thats what happens when you have a few too many and try to make witty posts on a message board.:) But what I meant to say was, I would rather have Thorne and Martinez as opposed to Hunter drowning out whatever analysis Palmer has to give.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah I was thinking this might be good for both the team and Hays. Chance for him to press the reset button if nothing else. 
    • Actually, if you think about it, as long as there is a right handed pitcher with this lineup, once Westburg bats, there will always be 8 lefties in a row after that. 🤔
    • Sending Jackson down does nothing, there is nothing left to prove down there. He is taking good ABs, he is working counts, he looks fine in the field etc. I have used the Cowser comp, not to say he should be sent down, in the sense that Cowser looked particularly lost at times during his callup last year. Jackson is facing some professional adversity for the first time as a professional keep running him out there.    The fortunate thing is he isn't hurting the team in a significant way right now, and when it finally does click the Orioles will be just that much better. 
    • Actually move Westburg to 7th so there’s not so many lefties in a row. 
    • I’ll go with: Gunnar SS Adley C O’Hearn 1B Tony RF Westburg 3B Mullins CF Cowser LF Kjerstad DH Holliday 2B  
    • The question is, can he be productive playing just 1-2 times a week? We don't know because he's never really been in that role. Not everyone can stay productive in a part-time role. I think the Orioles will find a way to get him in the lineup 4-5 days a week. He can play corner outfield (except I would not play him in LF in Camden), DH and 1B. He still does not look great at 1B, but he can be serviceable if it means getting his bat into the lineup. That's a decent amount of ways to keep him and others fresh. Santander probably is at risk to sit a bit more than usual, but this also gives the Orioles an opportunity to have a very left-handed heavy lineup against righties at times, with Mountcastle sitting. The Orioles left-handed heavy lineup could be: 1. Henderson - SS 2. Rutschman - C 3. O'Hearn - 1B 4. Santander - RF 5. Cowser - LF 6. Mullins - CF 7. Westburg - 3B (R) 8. Kjerstad - DH 9. Holliday - 2B Imagine having to face that lineup and then have Mountcastle, McCann, Urias and Mateo for pinch running as a bench. Now don't get me wrong, Mountcastle is not going to be benched all that much, but Kjerstad could give Santander, Cowser, Mullins (with Cowser moving to CF), O'Hearn, Mountcastle, and Rutschman when he DHing a day off.  That's a lot of ways to keep him fresh and get his bat in the lineup.  
    • If so, probably just for 2 days or so.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...