Jump to content

Kim?


cheecks

Recommended Posts

Jones is hitting great at leadoff but he should realistically bat lower in the lineup.

I don't understand why Kim isn't hitting leadoff. He sees a ton of pitches and he leads the team in OBP. What am i missing here?

(Why Kim isn't playing everyday is another story altogether)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Jones is hitting great at leadoff but he should realistically bat lower in the lineup.

I don't understand why Kim isn't hitting leadoff. He sees a ton of pitches and he leads the team in OBP. What am i missing here?

(Why Kim isn't playing everyday is another story altogether)

Doesn't answer all parts of your question, but not worrying about the GODP as much is a nice benefit.

Also, if they're going to shift Kim, I sort of like the potential of jones at 1b to mess with it a bit (not sure if they're still shifting him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far this year Jones has only hit good since batting leadoff. In any other place in the lineup he couldn't hit.

I thought this was a pretty bright move on Buck's part.

Adam was in an unbreakable "hack at anything" habit.

The cure seems to have come from putting him in the 1 hole, and saying "show some discipline, we need base runners".

Adam is the ultimate team guy, so he did what was asked, and it worked.

But maybe he's over his hacking ways for a bit, and the team can slide him down to turn a few of those solo dingers into two and three run shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far this year Jones has only hit good since batting leadoff. In any other place in the lineup he couldn't hit.

I thought this was a pretty bright move on Buck's part.

Adam was in an unbreakable "hack at anything" habit.

The cure seems to have come from putting him in the 1 hole, and saying "show some discipline, we need base runners".

Adam is the ultimate team guy, so he did what was asked, and it worked.

But maybe he's over his hacking ways for a bit, and the team can slide him down to turn a few of those solo dingers into two and three run shots.

Jones was horrible prior to May 27th (the day that Showalter inserted him into the lead-off spot), and he has been on fire ever since.

It was a calculated risk by Showalter to try to help a badly struggling player, and the risk worked.

Jones WAS BROKEN in the first place, and he has since been fixed ...... hence, it would make very little sense to create another risk and change what's been working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jones was horrible prior to May 27th (the day that Showalter inserted him into the lead-off spot), and has been on fire since.

It was a calculated risk by Showalter, and the risk worked.

Jones WAS BROKEN in the first place, and he has since been fixed ...... hence, it would make very little sense to create another risk and change what's been working.

Yeah... like I said, I'm not advocating Kim for leadoff, nor do I necessarily want to tinker with Jones' position in the order.

I was simply answering the question "why would you consider moving him"?

And the answer of course, would be to get a little more out of his power, if you think he's cured of his hacking problem.

For giggles, I looked at Jones' HR's since the move to the 1 hole.

As you would expect, most are solo, and the ones that aren't are driving in low OBP guys like Janish, Flaherty, etc.

Was a little surprised by Jones' RBI total though... higher than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Against righties, no problem. Rickard against lefties? Maybe.

I like the idea of Rickard batting leadoff against lefties. But no way I see Kim batting leadoff against right handers even if he gets his avg up to .350... Just not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Apparently he is also seeking extensions. The problem appears to be what many on this board were saying it likely was instead of a JA problem.     
    • Looks like Eduardo Rodriguez to the DBacks for 4/$80 mm.   Two observations: - Not an unimaginable contract - So much for ERod insisting on playing on the East Coast to be closer to his family.   
    • Of course, that $250,000 per year will be worth about $50,000 in today’s money in couple of decades.    I remember my dad telling me that when he was in law school (early 1950s) he and his friends agreed that if someone guaranteed them $10,000 a year for life, they’d be set.  
    • Seems like there was more to that interview.  Wish I could see the rest of it.  
    • Starter that would probably have been at AAA in 2024. Taken by the Guardians.  26, only 5'11".  Probably a reliever if he makes it to the majors. https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=gillis000con   Not taken were: Hudson Haskin, soon to be 25 year old outfielder with 60 speed, and the ability to put up a 360 OBP and a 800 OPS in both AA and AAA.  2nd round pick.  Right handed bat who might be about to back up Mullins in center a some point in 2024.  Doesn't have to be on 40 man but could be in ST.  Coming off hip surgery that shorten his 2023.   Poor arm and lack of power make him a bench player.  But a good line drive hitter.  Makes up for poor jumps and routes with his speed. https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=haskin000hud Maverick Handley, will be 26 years old in March catcher that could be the O's 3rd catcher in 2024.   Had a 373 OBP at AAA last year.  Good on the base paths.   Strong arm.  Threw out 34% of base stealer last year.  Doesn't need to be on the 40 man but will be in ST.  Had 9 errors in 2024 which  is too high. https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=handle000mav        
    • He becomes a free agent at the end of the year.  It’s a one year thing.  If they are really good, it will have been worthwhile, but they could just be mediocre. 
    • This would likely be their best investment.  Pay for great management that can find cheaper talent. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...