Jump to content

More nonsense from Joe Morgan


ledzepp8

Recommended Posts

Let's see if FireJoeMorgan mentions this in the next day or so.

It started out on Baseball Tonight where they were talking about Soriano and where he might bat and how he feels more comfortable as a leadoff hitter, blah blah blah. They go to Joe in St. Louis for his take and he starts talking about Tony Gwynn for example and how he was one of the greatest hitters of all time and how the Padres always tried him 3rd in the lineup but he also felt more comfortable as a leadoff hitter. His basic point was that Tony wanted to lead off because he didn't like hitting 3rd. Now at first I just kind of gave Joe the benefit of the doubt thinking that maybe he's just talking about leading off or batting 3rd at any point in the game and not just how the lineup was put together.

But now during the Cubs-Cards game, he started in on the Tony Gwynn conversation again. This time he elaborates by saying that the Padres tried to bat him 3rd but he didn't like it/wasn't comfortable and they put him back at lead off. His exact words, "He was one of the best hitters in the game, but he wasn't a 3rd place hitter". Paraphrasing Joe, "And it's the same thing with Tony Gwynn, I remember they took Tony Gwynn and tried to hit him 3rd for a long period of time and he didn't like hitting third and they moved him back to 1st where he prospered"

Is Joe serious, mistaken, or just plain talking out of his ass? He has to know that Tony Gwynn had 457 ABs as a leadoff hitter. He had 3643 ABs as a 2nd place hitter and 4878 ABs as a 3rd place hitter (the most, though I'm sure everyone already knew that...well except for Joe). If that's not bad enough, Gwynn didn't even hit better as a leadoff hitter, don't get me wrong he still hit well...He's Tony "Friggin'" Gwynn. He hit 338 and 342 as a 2nd and 3rd place hitter and had OPS' of 842 and 860 compared to "only" 324 avg and 823 OPS as a leadoff hitter.

Not sure if this should go here or perhaps the rants section, although I don't really feel like I'm ranting. It doesn't bother me as much as make me laugh that someone would take the time to make a point like this (and call it sports analysis) when they couldn't be further from the truth. People who have no other idea would take Emmy Award winning Joe's word for it and think that the Padres experimented with Tony Gwynn as a 3rd place hitter only to think better of it and bat him leadoff because Gwynn didn't feel comfortable in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching the game inbetween commercials of another show. If I am not mistaken he also said that Puljos should be a leadoff hitter but bats third becasue he wants to, this is where he likes hitting. Made the comparison to Wille Mayes, a batter that "should " have been a lead-off hitter, but instead batted third, according to Morgan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that's just ridiculous.

I watched the first couple of innings of that game, but eventually had to turn it off because Morgan just pisses me off.

I was amused when Jon Miller gently hinted at the cosmic irony that FJM has been pointing out for years: that Joe Morgan got into the Hall of Fame partly because he was one of the most patient hitters in MLB history, and then made a second career out of loudly dismissing people who advocate exactly the plate approach that he utilized. Morgan said that, yeah, OBP is important for the top hitters in the lineup, but not for everyone. He said that ideally, everyone would have a good OBP, but that it was more important higher in the order.

Which is true, perhaps, but how do you go from that to deifying guys like David Eckstein? If an all-good-OBP lineup is desirable, then shouldn't he be praising guys who take a ton of walks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, whatever. Sunday Night Baseball is much more enjoyable if you tune in for the game and Jon Miller and accept the fact that Joe Morgan is a crazy old fool.

I would literally rather listen to Michael Reghi do color than Joe Morgan.

Yeah, it's that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Joe Morgan is awful, but at least he's not Tim McCarver

There's lots of times that McCarver points out good baseball things, IMO anyway.

The main problem is that he'll get on some little thing, and just lock-in on it and repeat it 20 times.

If he just had a reset button on his head that the other guy could push, he could be OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Joe Morgan is awful, but at least he's not Tim McCarver

Yes, this is true..

I really don't mind Joe Morgan, I think him and Miller just sound great together, but I understand I am in the minority with this opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is true..

I really don't mind Joe Morgan, I think him and Miller just sound great together, but I understand I am in the minority with this opinion.

I like Joe Morgan's voice. He says some dumb stuff, but I think he's mostly OK when it comes to observation of little game-things. I understand how people get annoyed with him for some of the things he says, but I think he has good points too... they're mainly about observation of the game, rather than analysis of what's behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sailor Jerry

I sense a lot of jealousy from you guys. Don't be mad that the Big Red Machine was the greatest baseball dynasty that there ever was and that they won every World Series between WWII and the invasion of Panama, or at least would have if they cared. What we need to talk about is how Ryne Sandberg isn's a HOFer and that he threatens Morgan's rightful place on the throne as the greatest 2B EVERRRRRR.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sense a lot of jealousy from you guys. Don't be mad that the Big Red Machine was the greatest baseball dynasty that there ever was and that they won every World Series between WWII and the invasion of Panama, or at least would have if they cared. What we need to talk about is how Ryne Sandberg isn's a HOFer and that he threatens Morgan's rightful place on the throne as the greatest 2B EVERRRRRR.

;)

Dude, Ryne Sandberg is the man and always will be, hands down :D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is true..

I really don't mind Joe Morgan, I think him and Miller just sound great together, but I understand I am in the minority with this opinion.

I love listening to Joe Morgan. I find the things that come out of his month funny. I guess since I played and watched baseball for so long know when Joe is just trying to fill his time. Or when Joe forgot to research what he is talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Reminds me of Miguel Gonzalez, who came out of nowhere to be a major contributor to some playoff runs.  I doubt he ends up as a rotation mainstay. But I was certain O'Hearn would turn into a pumpkin after a few weeks too and he still hasn't.
    • If it weren’t for the service time component I think Holliday would have a very long leash before being sent down. He’s still contributing positively on defense and AAA pitchers just were not challenging him anymore. The priority above all else should be what is best for his long term development, and he needs to struggle against MLB pitching for longer than this to get to a point where you feel it’s doing more harm than good. I do think there can be some merit to the idea that MLB time exposes some weakness, which then can be worked on in a lower-stress environment in AAA, but I don’t think that’s strictly necessary since he’d be working on the same things against MLB pitching. However, the Orioles are now in a tricky situation where if it becomes apparent that Holliday is not going to win ROY, they have a strong incentive to send him down for at least a short stint to get the extra year. How they navigate that without that being totally transparent is tough. They could definitely do it now and nobody would claim service time manipulation given his struggles, but I don’t think they want to yet for purely development purposes. If he’s still struggling with around 100 PAs that’s when I think they make the move. 
    • Yea, definitely a concern. Hes a great story but really good pitchers don’t normally sit around in obscurity until their mid 30s.     It’s possible they found something in him but the realistic thing is that this is short lived but perhaps there is a role for him in the pen and he can have a late blooming career as a reliever.  Nothing wrong with that.
    • New Kids on the Block line-up — could be more fun than the singing group.
    • The main concern I have is the amount of hard contact and looking at statcast bears that out. 15th percentile in Avg Exit Velocity at 91 MPH and 7th percentile in Hard Hit % at 51.6%.
    • If he doesn't show anything, why would they bring hm back (especially to the rotation)? 
    • I'm sort of bracing for what happened in ST, which was that he started super strong and kind of faded with each start. He was already down a mph or so on his fastball in this last one, but then again he had a much better changeup this time.  So we'll see. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...