Jump to content

If This Team Collapse For The Second Straight Year, Doesn't Buck Have To Take A Hit?


ORIOLE33

Recommended Posts

I know you're not supposed to criticize Buck, but if this team fail to reach the playoffs after leading the division for most of the year, how does Buck avoid some blame? I know it's not all Buck, but 2 potential collapses in back to back years, obviously he's not pushing the right buttons when it matters most.

I know he's seen as the savior, but eventually just being a good team isn't going to cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think that Buck's bullpen management, while good, is not quite as masterful as a lot of pundits say. But that's basically my only major complaint. There's no such thing as a perfect manager but I don't see how anybody else could have done a much better job with these rosters. And I still feel pretty good about our playoff chances this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck is solid. Duquette is the one on shaky ground.

DD should be let go after the season if we don't make the playoffs. But I don't think Buck should come out of it totally clean. He would be the manager/head coach of a team that have collapsed 2 years in a row of they don't make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck is God. What he has done here with a lousy GM has been nothing short of miraculous. I would hand him a two year extension today if I was Angelos.

Yea, running off the pitching coach to bring in his own guy worked out great.

As did his obsession with TTTP.

His ability to correctly ascertain Kim's abilities in spring training was a huge boon to the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Club has a starting pitching ERA of 5. Team went 19-9 in a month where they allowed 5 runs a game with a starters ERA of 5.56. Club has 4 pitchers with double digit starts and an ERA over 5. On paper we have no business contending.

Exactly. This gives us the answer: DD is to blame. His deadline answer to fix the major problem was Miley, whom he only got cheap because we are on the hook for next year's salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, running off the pitching coach to bring in his own guy worked out great.

As did his obsession with TTTP.

His ability to correctly ascertain Kim's abilities in spring training was a huge boon to the team.

You're right - we should fire him. Good grief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In what way did the Orioles collapse last year? They were never more than 7 games above .500 at any point during the season.

I do not think Buck is above criticism at all. Criticize him all you want. I think he has some flaws, but at the same time, I don't think he is the reason the team is currently struggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you're not supposed to criticize Buck, but if this team fail to reach the playoffs after leading the division for most of the year, how does Buck avoid some blame? I know it's not all Buck, but 2 potential collapses in back to back years, obviously he's not pushing the right buttons when it matters most.

I know he's seen as the savior, but eventually just being a good team isn't going to cut it.

What isn't he doing that you think he should be doing?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you're given a poor starting rotation and the only hope you have is that the ones that are good (Tillman, Bundy, Gausman) all stay healthy....it's hard to fault Buck at all.

Going into this season the starting pitching was a huge concern.

How can you fault a guy that is given Ubaldo, a hurt Gallardo, Wade Miley and a guy that hasn't pitched in years in Dylan Bundy? And no impact depth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...