Jump to content

Hindsight is 20/20, but boy are the Yankees making our 2015 trade deadline look bad


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

We were in a similar position in 2015 as the 2016 Yankees in late July, and we opted to make a moderate buy. The Yankees sold heavily and are now better than they were before.

Had we sold Davis, Wieters, Chen, and O'Day last season, I'm hard-pressed to believe we couldn't have received a similar prospect haul as the Yankees did this year. Instead we bought a flash in the pan outfielder who stunk for two months.

Not a good look, DD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were in a similar position in 2015 as the 2016 Yankees in late July, and we opted to make a moderate buy. The Yankees sold heavily and are now better than they were before.

Had we sold Davis, Wieters, Chen, and O'Day last season, I'm hard-pressed to believe we couldn't have received a similar prospect haul as the Yankees did this year. Instead we bought a flash in the pan outfielder who stunk for two months.

Not a good look, DD.

And that flash in the pan outfielder cost us one of our best pitching prospects, who would have been a key part of our rotation this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that flash in the pan outfielder cost us one of our best pitching prospects, who would have been a key part of our rotation this season.

It was a brutal trade but I am not sold he would pitch well in this division. That being said it would have been nice to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say this - the prospects that the Yankees are enjoying right now (Sanchez, Judge, Austin, Torreyes) were all in place before the start of the season. We haven't seen what the trade deadline haul will mean for them yet.

That's scary. They have a ton more talent, too.

When we are struggling for arms and have to call up McFarland and guys like Ondrusek...you know 2017 and on is going to be a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's scary. They have a ton more talent, too.

When we are struggling for arms and have to call up McFarland and guys like Ondrusek...you know 2017 and on is going to be a disaster.

You have been preparing yourself right?

I'm up to five years worth of "I told you this was going to happen." posts macroed up. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a brutal trade but I am not sold he would pitch well in this division. That being said it would have been nice to see.

He may not be great but he'd be better than jiminez and we wouldn't have had to pay 22 mil for gallardo and give up a draft pick.

Just a terrible domino effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's scary. They have a ton more talent, too.

When we are struggling for arms and have to call up McFarland and guys like Ondrusek...you know 2017 and on is going to be a disaster.

Another apocalyptic prediction from Mr. Hockey Puck. Shocking!! Eventually you will be right because you haven't been for the last 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they keep the current team together (letting Wieters and Trumbo go) the Orioles should be competitive next year. Not great by any means, but they will still have the infield intact plus a strong bullpen plus maybe some progress out of Bundy and maybe Gausman, though I'm skeptical on the latter. It's 2018 and 2019 that looks grim to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's scary. They have a ton more talent, too.

When we are struggling for arms and have to call up McFarland and guys like Ondrusek...you know 2017 and on is going to be a disaster.

Oh my gosh this is getting crazy. New York is a big market. Baltimore is a mid-market. I don't know why things have gotten so bad recently. I am not so quick to blame DD for everything. He has some blame for sure. You talk about the Yankees cut ties with some of their players and got some good prospects back. Peter A. might have kept DD from doing the same thing. No one knows what goes on behind the closed doors of the FO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I would prefer not to do a 7 year deal. But my point is if not Burnes than who? How long are we going to be able to trade for 1/2 year rental types (like he currently is)?  If we allow Burnes to walk in FA, then we are going to have to sign someone (who won’t be as good). OR trade one of our top level prospects for a Luzardo or maybe one of the Mariners young controllable starters. If the Reed Sox were allowed sign a Burnes and we do nothing or go with some kind of patchwork Kyle Gibson signing, they would be real close to catching up to us.
    • Obviously, the years/dollars matter in regard to Burnes. I can see where Burnes might be the next in line to lay claim to the Verlander/Scherzer crown as one of the preeminent power pitchers of his time...that is to say he goes through his 30s and comes out the other side as one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball for a decade or longer.  He's been durable, he seems to prepare himself in the way that those guys do and I think he will last.  Of course, it's not my money. I don't know how the new ownership group will approach free agency and quite frankly, I'm not sure if I really care at the moment.  I'm sure I'll care in the offseason, though. I will say, I'd really like to see the new ownership spend to lock up the talent we already have before spending on free agency.   
    • Completely agree. Not sure what the analytics would say, but to me (from TV vantage point), Kremer’s best stuff comes by two pairings: (A) 4 seam 95mph at top of zone and curveball, and (B) splitter and 2 seamer at bottom of the zone.  Both probably tunnel in the same way to the batters.  And his cutter should be reserved only for jamming lefties on their hands, bc he hangs far too many meatballs against righties. 
    • How was the weather?  My recollection was that he didn’t have a feel for it that game and had trouble locating either for a strike or close enough to get a chase.
    • We can just say impact = well above replacement level. Kremer is a great guy to have as our #5 as he would have been on Opening Day if not for the aforementioned starter injuries. I'm sure no one really thought Bradish would be AL Cy Young-4 in his second year in the MLB. That's a fantastic hit by Elias. That and getting Gunnar in the 2nd may be the most impressive things Elias has done?  To answer your question, no I probably didn't think much of Bradish when we got him as an A Ball pitcher. Would I have bet he individually would be elite? No. But would I bet there'd be an elite pitcher in all the pitching prospects we got back for Manny Machado, Zach Britton, Jonathan Schoop, Kevin Gausman, Darren O'Day, Dylan Bundy, Jonathan Villar, Miguel Castro, Jose Iglesias, Cole Susler, Tanner Scott? Well I'd hope so. Out of them we got Bradish, Kremer, and Tate (1 elite SP, 1 decent SP, 1 reliever and a bunch of names we've forgotten). I'll take it. We'll see what we get any SP's out of the Trey Mancini and Jorge Lopez hauls.  Now we're in a different position where we aren't selling off assets to get back dart throws. At this point, our conversation will get circular but it will take value in prospects or value in dollars or some combination of both to get more elite talent in the rotation. Don't expect to give middle tier contracts out and get back elite level performance. And I don't think we'll be able to maintain this ridiculous level our farm system is at forever. And we won't be able to have the luxury of sending off 12 years of Joey Ortiz and DL Hall type players for 1 year rentals every year.     
    • I actually think you hit on it.   The more realistic extension candidates are Cowser, Westburg, Kjerstad, Mayo, and Basallo.
    • I like it. Tomorrow will be the intersting one. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...