Jump to content

Various Orioles related FanGraphs articles


ArtVanDelay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply
55 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've been waiting for something like that.

Me too.   It's cool that they're going to have retroactive data for 2015 and 2016.    It'll be very interesting to look at those numbers and compare them to the other "advanced metrics" that have been out there for several years, and see how good or bad the correlation is.

One thing I'm hoping they'll do is have a lot of video links where you can actually look at the individual plays and understand why some plays that looked great really weren't all that great.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/dylan-bundy-looks-ready-to-breakout/

Quote

In the bottom of the first, the Orioles were so sure a bending Bundy curveball froze Nick Castellanos for a third strike that Bundy and the rest of the infield took a collective step to the visiting third-base dugout before home-plate umpire Jerry Layne signaled a strikeout.

Quote

I asked Bundy after his start if he decided to add the pitch because of his struggles in going through the order a third time last season. And he indicated the decision was in part rooted to the data: “I’d say so,” Bundy said. “(The cutter) just gives me another a pitch I can show guys. I can break out at the beginning of the game or the end of the game. You never know. If you have four pitches to think about, instead of three, I think the percentages there make it a little harder to hit.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

DD looks like a fool here. 

“Why don’t you take a look at the chart with the average against cutters in the big leagues, batting average against and then come back and tell me that that’s a great pitch,” Duquette said.

In 2016, according to linear weights, MLB hitters produced positive values against fastballs (707.8) and changeups (7.1), and negative values against curveballs (-26.4), cutters (-65.7) and sliders (-630.6), according to FanGraphs leaderboards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/4/2017 at 4:35 PM, Frobby said:

Me too.   It's cool that they're going to have retroactive data for 2015 and 2016.    It'll be very interesting to look at those numbers and compare them to the other "advanced metrics" that have been out there for several years, and see how good or bad the correlation is.

One thing I'm hoping they'll do is have a lot of video links where you can actually look at the individual plays and understand why some plays that looked great really weren't all that great.    

I too am excited for the golden age of WellActually-ism. :)

In all seriousness, this is really cool.  It will be a lot of fun to see the interpretations of the data this yields unfold over the next several years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

The author's really reaching, there, unless Bundy said something else that wasn't printed. "And he indicated the decision was in part rooted to the data."

No, Dylan said he figured it'd be good to have another pitch to show guys. This is not a new concept. Nor did anyone, particularly Dylan Bundy, require advanced stats to know that he was getting hit harder the third time through. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ArtVanDelay said:

DD looks like a fool here. 

“Why don’t you take a look at the chart with the average against cutters in the big leagues, batting average against and then come back and tell me that that’s a great pitch,” Duquette said.

In 2016, according to linear weights, MLB hitters produced positive values against fastballs (707.8) and changeups (7.1), and negative values against curveballs (-26.4), cutters (-65.7) and sliders (-630.6), according to FanGraphs leaderboards.

According to the comments on the FG article, the quote is from 2012.  Any chance we can see the linear weights from other years?  Was this info available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...