Jump to content

Various Orioles related FanGraphs articles


ArtVanDelay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/instagraphs/does-j-j-hardy-even-like-hitting/

 

Quote

Hardy last year had one of the league’s very highest first-pitch zone rates. And no other hitter in the game had a higher percentage of his plate appearances advance to an 0-and-1 count. Hardy went through that count in about 61% of his trips. The average was 49%. If anything, it might be strange these rates weren’t even higher.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be bringing this one up again.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/lets-play-with-new-defensive-data/

Quote

Now, we can’t ignore Mark Trumbo, though. Kemp is at -39 plays in 2,575 outfield innings. Trumbo is at -27 plays in 1,461 outfield innings. Which means Trumbo comes out worse, and better on a rate basis than only Hanley Ramirez, who sure as heck doesn’t play outfield anymore. The Orioles know that Trumbo is a bat-first player. They might not fully appreciate the extent to which that’s been true. Trumbo and Kemp are not so dissimilar.

Trumbo is a league-worst -9 on 1 Star plays. Those are the easy ones, and Trumbo has converted nine fewer of them than you’d expect.

Quote

But you’re here for the outliers! Here are the five players with the biggest positive differences between Statcast +/- and expected +/-:

These are players our numbers have probably underrated a little bit. Eaton, for example, might well be a defensive superstar. Meanwhile, here are the five players with the biggest negative differences between Statcast +/- and expected +/-:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Fangraphs Top 100 Prospects list came out this week, written by Eric Longenhagen.

The one Oriole to make the list was Chance Sisco, at #85.

Quote
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/55 50/50 40/45 30/30 45/50 40/40

Scouting Summary

Sisco passes behind the plate despite fringe arm strength because he’s made himself into a solid receiver and game-caller. He tracks pitches like a hawk and has a quiet, comfortable swing and good bat control. There’s some room on the frame for more power as he enters his mid-20s, but it may rob him of his mobility behind the plate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/baltimores-outfield-options-dont-make-much-sense/

Quote

But then there’s the Orioles outfield. If you know how to make this group fit together, I’d love to hear it.

In center field, of course, is Adam Jones, who publicly suggested that he’d like to be flanked by some better defenders this year. I don’t think he’s going to get his wish.

Quote

As far as I can figure, the Alvarez signing signals one of two options.

1. The team is looking to trade Hyun Soo Kim, who they didn’t really trust last year until he forced his way into the line-up, and would give his spot to Alvarez, shifting Smith to left field in the process.

2. They signed Alvarez as a favor to give him a chance to play outfield in front of scouts, figuring some other team will be impressed enough to trade for him before Opening Day.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/buying-and-selling-team-u-s-a/

Quote

 

Sell Adam Jones

If Eric Hosmer is the most overrated player on Team U.S.A., Adam Jones is a close second. Despite collecting a couple of big hits in the United States’ win against Colombia, including the one that ended it, Jones has been roughly a league-average hitter in his career. Over the last three seasons, Jones’ .331 wOBA is equivalent to that of Carlos Gomez and Denard Span. Jones did have three very good seasons from 2012-14 (.350 wOBA, 120 wRC+), but the same can be said of Gomez and Span. Buy accordingly.

 

BOOOOOOOO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs has been posting their Positional Power Rankings lately. They're basically just rankings of which teams they expect to collect the highest combined WAR at each position based on the Fangraphs depth charts and projections. Here's where the Orioles have placed so far out of the 30 teams:

  •  C - 17th overall (4th in AL East)
  • 1b - 8th (1st)
  • 2b - 16th (4th)
  • 3b - 2nd (2nd)
  • Ss - 25th (5th)
  • Lf - 7th (1st)
  • Cf - 18th (4th)
  • Rf - 23rd (5th)
  • Dh - 5th out of 15 (3rd in AL East)
  • SP - 21st (5th)
  • RP - 6th (2nd)

The biggest surprise for me is seeing our Lf group place so high. Their depth charts have 420 PAs for Kim, 140 for P. Alvarez, 105 for Smith, and a handful for Santander. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have this gut feeling -- not that I'd put money on it -- that Adam Jones will have a career year this year, or close to it.    He's in good health, and I think his WBC experience is going to jump start his season.     

I thought the LF/RF disparity in the rankings was interesting, and also the fact that the O's (with Castillo) were ranked higher at catcher than the Nats (with Wieters).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I thought the LF/RF disparity in the rankings was interesting, and also the fact that the O's (with Castillo) were ranked higher at catcher than the Nats (with Wieters).

I was surprised by that too. Some of it just has to do with the level of competition. There are a bunch of stars playing RF, not as much in LF. The 2.0 WAR they project for Kim/Alvarez/Smith/Santander in LF would drop them from 7th to 13th if they were in RF instead of LF, while the 1.0 WAR they project for Smith/Trumbo/Rickard/etc in RF would push them from 23rd to around 18th if they were in LF instead of RF. 

It also seems to be a consequence of their expectations for Rickard. First of all, they're not impressed by him in general, giving him -0.2 WAR for the season. Secondly, they only have him in their depth charts for RF, not LF. So the RF group is hurt by his inclusion while the LF group is not, even though we can expect he'll be playing in both spots, if not in LF more often than RF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/27/2017 at 0:15 PM, Spy Fox said:
  •  C - 17th overall (4th in AL East)
  • 1b - 8th (1st)
  • 2b - 16th (4th)
  • 3b - 2nd (2nd)
  • Ss - 25th (5th)
  • Lf - 7th (1st)
  • Cf - 18th (4th)
  • Rf - 23rd (5th)
  • Dh - 5th out of 15 (3rd in AL East)
  • SP - 21st (5th)
  • RP - 6th (2nd)

Updated to include their Bullpen rankings, released today. Orioles placed 6th. A few spots behind the Yankees. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/is-mlb-already-shrinking-the-strike-zone/

regular-season.png

spring-training.png

Quote

The most interesting bit is all the way to the right. Compared to last spring, this spring’s rate is down a hair over five percentage points. Obviously, no such decline has been observed before, within the limited window. What it means: If there are fewer called strikes in the bottom of the zone, the lower boundary has effectively been lifted. Not by very much, not to a degree where the entire game of baseball would be different, but changes are changes.

Again, and this is important, we’re going to need more information. We’ll get that information within the next month. The regular season will immediately provide plenty more data, with pitches by the thousands, and then we’ll be able to see where we are. This is just a possible hint, a first whisper of a subtle change to the game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Four out of 54 Fangraphs staff predicted the Orioles in the postseason. Here's the chart counting their full staff's predictions of who will reach the AL playoffs.
Quote

Staff Predictions: American League

Team East Central West WC 1 WC 2 Postseason
Cleveland   53       53
Boston 43     6 2 51
Houston     38 10 2 50
Toronto 6     18 9 33
Seattle     9 9 10 28
Texas     5 7 7 19
New York 2     2 13 17
Detroit   1     7 8
Baltimore 1     1 2 4
Tampa Bay 2     1 1 4
Los Angeles of Anaheim     2   1 3
Oakland           0
Chicago           0
Kansas City           0
Minnesota           0

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...