Jump to content

Mike Napoli?


esmd

Recommended Posts

Given what DD said about Trumbo and placing high value in the comp pick we'd get, is Mike Napoli a better/more realistic option?  We've discussed Alvarez as a LH DH to platoon with Mancini, but would Napoli on a 1yr deal as the DH be a better move?  Obviously he had a career year with the HR's and RBIs and will likely decline from that, but if he hits 25HRs, drives in 75-80 runs, and gets on base at his normal clip (seems to usually be at least .320 or higher), would he be the better, cheaper (both in $$ and years) option to Trumbo, and at a price not much more than it would take to get Alvarez?  I have to believe he could be had on a 1yr deal for say, 8 or 9 million (he made 7 with Cleveland last year).  That's not a whole lot more than you could probably get Alvarez back for, and Napoli in his career has always been a much better OBP guy than Alvarez.  Plus the intangibles that he brings, as far as leadership and postseason experience.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/n/napolmi01.shtml

The main issue I see with this move, would be that Mancini would be blocked, at least for the '17 season, and it seems like it's time to give him ABs at the Major League level and see how he does.  If they sign Napoli, Mancini is stuck on the bench or at Norfolk this season.  Still, if they're going to be a realistic WS contender, I have to think Napoli at DH makes them stronger than a Mancini/Alvarez DH platoon.  I dunno, what do you guys think?

1. Smith/Unknown RH hitting RFer

2. Kim/Rickard LF

3. Machado 3B

4. Davis 1B

5. Jones CF

6. Napoli DH

7.  Schoop 2B

8. Castillo C

9. Hardy SS

You could also play around a bit to get a better R/L mix, maybe move Jones into the 2 hole, and drop Kim/Rickard to 8th.

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize Carter's OBP was as high as it was (.321).  That .222 batting average though...ugh.  But with that OPS, he obviously makes the most out of the hits that he does get and gets on base via BB a decent amount.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/cartech02.shtml

So, I guess it really comes down to what we think makes them a better lineup; A) Napoli or B) Carter, or C) an Alvarez/Mancini platoon?  Honestly, I'd prefer any of them to bringing back Trumbo on a multi year deal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, esmd said:

I didn't realize Carter's OBP was as high as it was (.321).  That .222 batting average though...ugh.  But with that OPS, he obviously makes the most out of the hits that he does get.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/cartech02.shtml

So, I guess it really comes down to what we think makes them a better lineup; A) Napoli or Carter, or B) an Alvarez/Mancini platoon?  Honestly, I'd prefer either of them to bringing back Trumbo on a multi year deal.

 

My preference at this point is a LH OF/DH (Saunders, Moss) and a RH or SH OF that could back up CF (Pagan, Gutierrez), with Kim as primary DH, Mancini backing up DH/1B and Rickard starting the season at AAA.  Extra bonus points if Valbuena replaces Flaherty.

Pipe dream yeah, and probably too much money... but the bench could look like (#2 C, Valbuena, Mancini, Moss or Gutierrez) and that would be a very good bench, hitting at least, with a backup plan at every position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm higher on Rickard than you are and think he'd do well as the RH side of a LF/RF platoon, but that's fine, agree to disagree.  My biggest issue with your scenario is Mancini on the bench.  I think he needs to get play and get ABs, and I'm not sure he'd get enough of them being on our 25 man sitting on the bench.  Unless you're sitting Kim against lefties and playing him at DH.  Interesting.  Would Saunders or Moss really be that much of a defensive upgrade over Kim, though?  And we'd still need someone to platoon with Seth Smith against lefties.  Unless you keep Rickard for that, making Saunders/Moss a starter against all pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saunders is a defensive upgrade over Kim if he's healthy -- Moss, no.

This is why I think it makes most sense to go after Pagan.  He does not need to be platooned.  He can play LF.

I suppose you're right that it makes more sense to keep Rickard vs LHP over Manicni in that regard - that Rickard can back up RF.

Kim is supposedly getting more PAs vs LHP this year, but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, esmd said:

I'm higher on Rickard than you are and think he'd do well as the RH side of a LF/RF platoon, but that's fine, agree to disagree.  My biggest issue with your scenario is Mancini on the bench.  I think he needs to get play and get ABs, and I'm not sure he'd get enough of them being on our 25 man sitting on the bench.  Unless you're sitting Kim against lefties and playing him at DH.  Interesting.  Would Saunders or Moss really be that much of a defensive upgrade over Kim, though?  And we'd still need someone to platoon with Seth Smith against lefties.  Unless you keep Rickard for that, making Saunders/Moss a starter against all pitchers.

Rickard is evidently with Brady, in California. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Is anyone have Mary Reynolds flashbacks whenever someone suggests Chris Carter? Absolutely no interest in him. Zero nada zilch. And no interest in Napoli either. They need another OF...not another "pure" DH.

Would you call him "Mary" to his face?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Is anyone have Mary Reynolds flashbacks whenever someone suggests Chris Carter? Absolutely no interest in him. Zero nada zilch. And no interest in Napoli either. They need another OF...not another "pure" DH.

That's Sheriff Mary to you, buddy!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...