Jump to content

Dubroff: Machado Wants to Stay With the Orioles


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Wouldn't expect anything less out of any player.    Just the usual.   If we pay him crazy money he will stay.   Maybe

Public relations 101.    He says he wants to stay.

Sadly, you're probably right. There's always a big "IF" at the end of those statements. "I'd like to stay..." (IF)... That said, in days past a player like Manny wouldn't be legitimately interested in staying with our former trainwreck franchise. I get the sense that he legitimately would like to stay here if he had the chance. In other words, we might actually have a chance to sign him. 

If we don't have plans to do that, we NEED to trade him... and I would do it in 2017 if it comes to that, especially if we're well back by the trade deadline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree it's the PC thing to say, I think he went a little further then he had to, which is nice.     But I think the O's probably blew their chance when they couldn't close a deal a couple of years ago.   I'd love to know what the bid and ask was then -- undoubtedly much lower than what it would take today.    Truth is, even if Manny would give the O's, say, a 10% discount, I'm not sure the O's would be comfortable paying what it would take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 24th, 2016: 

 

OFFNY said:

 

In my rat's ass of an opinion, Machado wants to stay an Oriole, and have a chance to be another "Mr. Oriole."

I think that that is part of the reason why he let it be known that he is open to contract extension negotiations earlier this season.

So if the Orioles give him a "fair" offer (boatloads of money, but not necessarily the absolute most that he could get on the open market), I think he'll take it.

 

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/index.php?/topic/26569-vs-dbacks-924/&page=17#comment-2031409

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure he does want to stay. If the money is there. Manny doesn't come across as the type of player that will give discounts. It will take atleast a 10/300m contract with an opt out. Probably after 3 years. So really, it be like a 1 year deal with all of the risk on the Orioles. I'd do an opt out, but I'd want atleast 2 years. I'd do an opt out after 4 yeara.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Why?   So you can turn the fans against him if he doesn't take it?

I assume you are asking why make it public and not why offer it. The reason I would make it public is so the fans can know a real effort was made to sign him. So future free agents know we try to take care and bring back our own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I assume you are asking why make it public and not why offer it. The reason I would make it public is so the fans can know a real effort was made to sign him. So future free agents know we try to take care and bring back our own.

I'm just not sure the Orioles are willing to get into a deal of that caliber. I'm not saying they can't, but will they. I honestly see them being in the 150-200m range. And that's not close to getting it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's just PR speak when Manny says these things. I can see why he would have reason to stay-- he probably feels a certain amount of comfort with the team, has good friends on the team, and the team has been mostly successful ever since he arrived. I just think each statement probably comes with the unsaid caveat "if the money is right." If he thinks he can get a sizable amount more elsewhere, then he probably and understandably will. And that's what I assume will happen until I see a headline reading otherwise. I think we simply won't have the cash to retain him at full price, and hometown discount we'll offer him will be enough of a discount that he'll choose elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Elite players is what win titles, for the most part. Get as many elite guys as you can. Stars and scrubs is and always will be the best way to build a roster (although that name is misleading because scrubs really just means cheap player and cheap player doesn’t mean scrub..but it gets the point across).
    • So you believe Cowser has well below average power because that’s what 10-15 is?
    • I'd rather pass on Cease and keep Norby, Ortiz, Kjerstad and Cowser in the system.   I know you have to give up value to get value.  But the cost to acquire good starting pitching in terms of money and prospects has inflated so astronomically that I start to wonder if we might just be better off auditioning Povich, McDermott, Seth Johnson, Cole Irvin and seeing if anyone can stick...?     I'd probably be willing to part with Beavers, Wagner, Fabian, Stowers and I can see maybe trading one top guy (but not Mayo, Holliday or Basallo).
    • Let’s use the Orioles 2023 season as a general case study and compare with a study I learned about via well known journalist and author, Malcolm Gladwell, Revisionist History podcast. (Season 1,  Episode 6, “My Little Hundred Million”. )   https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/revisionist-history/id1119389968?i=1000372836942   At minute 12:15 or so, Gladwell discusses whether it is a greater help to a sports team if the worst player on the roster is replaced with a better player or if the team brings in an even better player as its top star.  That is, does it help more to strengthen your strongest link or your weakest link? His conclusion is: It depends on the sport. In basketball one player can dominate the court in offense and defense. So improve your top player. In soccer, a tital team sport improve the weakest player.   It set me thinking is baseball a strong link or weak link sport?   It seems that in constructing the 2023 roster, Elias, whether intentionally or not, used the improve the weakest links strategy.    Gibson replaced Lyles McCann replaced Benboom Frazier replaced Odor.  Additional improvements occurred with adjusting playing time levels of players in the organization for both 22 and 23.  The result was a stellar 101 win season!   The Orioles 2023 regular season experience suggests that baseball is a strengthen the weakest links sport.    But then the playoffs. The consensus seems to be we lacked the superstar who can carry the team.    It seems that baseball in the playoffs is more of a strong link sport.    So, to put it together, the 2023 Orioles season experience suggests that the regular season is improved with an improve the weak link strategy. While playoffs often need a superstar.    So, if this theory holds true, do the Orioles need to specifically add more proven All Star level players or do we simply depend upon the hope that one of these years we will have a good player get hot at just the right time?
    • Anyone considered for extention has insurance for that case.  Nothing like an extention for sure but I know the family of a top 5 pick who carried a $10m insurance policy in college prior to being drafted.  Any agent at that level should have his clients insured.
    • Looking at which numbers?
    • That's the whole point.  Other teams aren't going to give up more in players/prospects than the Yankees gave up AND pay Soto $33 million.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...