Jump to content

MLB.com's Mike Petriello addresses what to do with outfield defense


Frobby

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

That's actually one of the more insightful and detailed MLB.com articles I've seen.

I'd be curious to hear more about why Jones doesn't "necessarily buy" the idea that changing the positioning strategy could help improve the defense. 

He's not wrong, you get three Kiermaiers out there and you can just go, left, right, center, go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

That's actually one of the more insightful and detailed MLB.com articles I've seen.

I'd be curious to hear more about why Jones doesn't "necessarily buy" the idea that changing the positioning strategy could help improve the defense. 

Because he's stubborn, in denial, and nothing's his fault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Good read. The fact that we finished 30th and have done nothing to address it is astounding. Again, I guess they just don't believe in "pitching and defense." Who can blame them, it has only worked for the last century! Kind of like socialism; it has never worked in the history of mankind, but some insist upon it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pastorfan said:

Good read. The fact that we finished 30th and have done nothing to address it is astounding. Again, I guess they just don't believe in "pitching and defense." Who can blame them, it has only worked for the last century! Kind of like socialism; it has never worked in the history of mankind, but some insist upon it.

I don't agree that they've done nothing.    They've acquired Smith, who will keep Trumbo out of the outfield for 40-50 extra games, and I expect that whoever the extra outfielder is will be a significant defensive upgrade over Reimold.    I don't think our 2017 outfield will be outstanding on defense, but I do expect it to be better than last year's -- how much better is yet to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good article and I thought the positioning differences is interesting. Jones doesn't move around a lot with his positioning and I wonder is that due to Kirby's design, or Jones' preference?

There is little doubt Jones would be a plus defensive Right fielder for us, but of course, it's not like this team has an everyday center field option this year. They don't even have an everyday option in the minors though they may want to put Austin Hays in Center field everyday at Frederick and see how he does. Hays is probably best suited for right field because his jumps and routes aren't great, but he's got plenty of speed to man the position. I know both Mullens and Hart will probably be there as well, but hays is clearly the best prospect of the three.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's made the playoffs last season with bad outfield defense.  Maybe the club just decided they were willing to live with bad defense in order to have a more potent offense and to concentrate their payroll addressing other concerns.  

There was a pretty steep tradeoff between offense and defense among the corner outfielders available this offseason; we could have signed someone like Michael Bourn to play a corner position instead of trading for Seth Smith, but it's not clear to me that you wouldn't lose more runs on offense than you would gain on defense.  

Curtis Granderson was one available corner outfielder who would have provided above average offense and defense, but Brad Brach is an important part of the bullpen and reportedly the Mets were asking for more than Brach.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Frobby said:

This is kind of related. Adam calling into the Hot Stove Show last night:

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2017/02/orioles-could-add-another-catcher.html

Quote

“It’s no slap to anyone else, but when you had me, (Nick) Markakis and (Nate) McLouth, or me, Markakis and (Alejandro) De Aza, let me know what happened. You see over in Boston when you’ve got (Jackie) Bradley, (Mookie) Betts and when they have (Chris) Young out there and when they have (Andrew) Benintendi. You look at Tampa, the athleticism that they have with (Kevin) Kiermaier, (Steven) Souza and whoever they put in left. Then you go to New York with (Jacoby) Ellsbury, (Brett) Gardner, who won his first Gold Glove and I’m so proud of that. I love how he plays. And it’s an easy right field to play.

“I’m just saying you have to improve the defense. It’s no slap against anybody. You just have to have elite defenders. That’s just part of baseball, like I said. It’s part of winning. You don’t have David Price, Chris Sale, guys who are going out there and striking out 250 guys. Our defense is used, which is great. But we just need to improve our defense.

 

Later says

Quote

I’m all ears to whatever they want to implement and whatever they feel will get us better. I’m an employee. I’m not a boss of any sort, I don’t make any decisions. I’m an employee with a strong opinion. That’s just my two cents.

 

I love Adam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Good article and I thought the positioning differences is interesting. Jones doesn't move around a lot with his positioning and I wonder is that due to Kirby's design, or Jones' preference?

There is little doubt Jones would be a plus defensive Right fielder for us, but of course, it's not like this team has an everyday center field option this year. They don't even have an everyday option in the minors though they may want to put Austin Hays in Center field everyday at Frederick and see how he does. Hays is probably best suited for right field because his jumps and routes aren't great, but he's got plenty of speed to man the position. I know both Mullens and Hart will probably be there as well, but hays is clearly the best prospect of the three.

 

I don't know anything but I get the feeling they are at loggerheads to each other all the time. In a friendly joking way. Two strong personalities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Sorry. Stepped away for a few hours and just saw this response. Just to be clear, I was specifically thinking of a pitcher more valuable than Cease. I do not think you give up 3 top 100 prospects (excluding our top 3) for Cease. I think it could take that plus more for a legit guy with more control.  Exactly my point. Not sure I worded it perfectly in my original post a few pages ago.
    • Those same people would be upset if we had traded for Robert Stephenson during last season.  However, they'd be thrilled if we gave Stephenson 3/39.   The dream online team is to have an all home grown group of position players headlined by a pitching staff of Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer for next year.  Maybe people would be upset if we couldn't pull off a Beavers/Norby trade for Spencer Strider.  
    • Orioles to open 2024 season at Oriole Park, introduce tweaks to home game start times - CBS Baltimore (cbsnews.com) This is just dumb. Some of us actually enjoy a Saturday evening out at a local sports bar or watching from home on a Saturday night. I get pushing them up pre Memorial day because of the cold, but mid summer? Just dumb all around.
    • Despite being a great pitcher, Nola had a bad ERA this year. I’m guessing the Orioles were only interested in the slim chance that he was going to end up with a below market deal with the Orioles being an attractive rebound destination given the wall and a competitive team.  I’d be floored if the Orioles were in on Nola at anywhere near what he got, but I suppose it’s positive they were at least doing their due diligence.
    • Of course people didn’t think he would. The stupidity of all of these arguments are these people who think it’s some ridiculous thought that people think guys who have been complete failures for their career are not worthy of signing and that the team should be aiming higher.       
    • No, I don’t think they were. 
    • Wait, don't drag me into your fight. I remember not being thrilled with the O'Hearn signing because I thought the cost of a guy who was going to be AAA depth at #1.3 million was unnecessary. I do also remember saying that he did have some analytics that suggested he'll be better without the shift. Let's remember though, I thought Stowers was going to be a semi-regular between RF/LF/DH and not buried like they did early in the season last year.  I don't remember anyone thinking O'Hearn was going to have the year he ended up having. Now I was probably the biggest voice against the Frazier signing and I was right. That signing never made sense for the dollar amount and the players already on hand. But this is a Uwasawa thread. Back to that.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...