Jump to content

They All Break


weams

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don't relish it at all, but of course I'm glad it's them and not us.    

I think it's safe to assume that this is more about "I'm glad the Red Sox got bit by the injury bug" from a competition standpoint rather than a "I'm glad David Price has elbow complications."

Price seems like a good dude to me. Nothing stands out in my memory of him in terms of ever being demonstrative or a bad opponent, so I certainly don't have any ill will towards him individually. But yeah, I have no problem cracking a smile over the idea that the Sox have a potential major hurdle to overcome. Hey, maybe they can just throw some money at it and make it go away. Seems to be their answer to most problems.

EDIT: This is the grey area that you can fall into as a sports fan, since a team's assets are generally all human capital. Nobody would give you a hard time if you were happy to find out that Jimme Johnson's car was malfunctioning, would they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, weams said:

Not an elbow. Not on long term deal, not 250 million. Not.

Shoulders are often harder to deal with than elbows.  We don't know how long term Tillman's problems are and will not know for some time.  No even if he begins the season in April.   Weakness can creep in at any time.  

Yes, there is not a long term agreement at risk but Tillman is potentially a big piece of the O's future.  He wants to stay.  Now signing him in the future is in doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Shoulders are often harder to deal with than elbows.  We don't know how long term Tillman's problems are and will not know for some time.  No even if he begins the season in April.   Weakness can creep in at any time.  

Yes, there is not a long term agreement at risk but Tillman is potentially a big piece of the O's future.  He wants to stay.  Now signing him in the future is in doubt.

Shoulders are not Tommy John. Now, could his career be over? Sure! And the Orioles are on the hook for a season. In no way can you compare the loss of Tillman to Price. In any fashion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, weams said:

Shoulders are not Tommy John. Now, could his career be over? Sure! And the Orioles are on the hook for a season. In no way can you compare the loss of Tillman to Price. In any fashion. 

I just did.

Financially you are right.  Price is a huge loss if he has to go to Tommy John.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've got a surplus of starters, so it's not a desperation situation for them, but obviously not a good development for them.  Makes me wonder if he was pitching hurt last year, hence the sub-par season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Nothing, but it helps us

If it winds up being TJ, indeed.

It's a real gray area situation, honestly. I don't think anyone would root for folks to sustain serious injuries, but there's no doubt that it helps your team when such maladies befall an opponent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

If it winds up being TJ, indeed.

It's a real gray area situation, honestly. I don't think anyone would root for folks to sustain serious injuries, but there's no doubt that it helps your team when such maladies befall an opponent.

This is a joke right?  You've never heard fans cheer an opposing player being removed on a stretcher?

Unfortunately it isn't that rare an occurrence, albeit more common in football than baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

This is a joke right?  You've never heard fans cheer an opposing player being removed on a stretcher?

Unfortunately it isn't that rare an occurrence, albeit more common in football than baseball.

I was largely referencing rational fans, not irrational ones. I don't feel the need to acknowledge irrational fans. Or the average football fan in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's worth noting that most people project the Sox rotation as Sale/Price/Porcello/Pomeranz/Rodriguez, meaning the next up is Steven Wright...who had a 3.33 ERA in the rotation last year to Price's 3.99. Not that Wright is a better pitcher than Price, just that, as others have pointed out, losing an ace-type starter is less of a big deal for Boston than it would be for pretty much anyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

It's worth noting that most people project the Sox rotation as Sale/Price/Porcello/Pomeranz/Rodriguez, meaning the next up is Steven Wright...who had a 3.33 ERA in the rotation last year to Price's 3.99. Not that Wright is a better pitcher than Price, just that, as others have pointed out, losing an ace-type starter is less of a big deal for Boston than it would be for pretty much anyone else. 

So they have a 6th starter named Wright....big deal, so do we.  B|

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...