Jump to content

Could we hit more home runs in 2017 than in 2016?


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

This is what I came up with from the starting nine (last year's number in parenthesis).  This is assuming Smith and Kim get roughly 400 at bats. 

Machado: 43 (37) - For anyone who has seen many in the WBC, this is not far fetched.  Looks to have added about 20 pounds of muscle, mostly in his legs.  It wouldn't shock me if he hit 50.  

Davis: 38 (38) - If his hand is fully healed and that was the culprit of his down numbers last year, then he could hit more.  I'm going to be conservative here since Davis's numbers vary greatly from year to year based on how long his tailspins go. 

Trumbo: 38 (47) - This is fair. Mark makes better contact than Davis and hits the ball just as hard.  

Jones: 29 (29) - Adam is remarkably consistent in the power department from year to year.  He's been crushing some balls in San Diego which isn't the easiest park to hit home runs.  Small sample size of course, but I don't expect any decline in the power department.  

Schoop: 26 (25) - Seems reasonable in his age 25 season.  He certainly has the power to hit more if he can stay a little more consistent. 

Castillo: 20 (17 - Wieters) - I think he will enjoy the short left field in Baltimore and get more at bats than he did in AZ last year.  

Smith: 18 (22 - Alvarez) - Reasonable projection given that he's moving from a big park to a smaller park. Alvarez (whose at bats he is replacing) could contribute as well if Smith gets hurt or if his hamstring injury lingers.  

Kim: 11 (6) - He hit more in the second half last season and I think you will start to see him turn on balls more. 

Hardy: 9 (9) - I think he gets a few more at bats this year and does a little less (per at bat) in the power department. 

I came out +2 overall.  I think Mancini will help in the power department at some point as well - replacing and exceeding Nolan Reimold's production from last year.  250 plus home runs seems reasonable again this year.  I would hope we have a chance to score more runs as well with the addition of Smith and Kim getting more at bats to help out in the OBP - which is the most important thing when it comes down to it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit curious by the +9 jump o Trumbo. Was there something he did last year that he improved on for this year, or do you think the possibility of him being more of a DH than an outfielder will cause less wear and tear and help his power?

I think the rest of the assessments are fair. Mancini should help, Gentry, Flash may be good for a few, Joseph should be good for atleast 1 this season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I'm a bit curious by the +9 jump o Trumbo. Was there something he did last year that he improved on for this year, or do you think the possibility of him being more of a DH than an outfielder will cause less wear and tear and help his power?

I think the rest of the assessments are fair. Mancini should help, Gentry, Flash may be good for a few, Joseph should be good for atleast 1 this season...

Trumbo made an approach change in the second half of 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I'm a bit curious by the +9 jump o Trumbo. Was there something he did last year that he improved on for this year, or do you think the possibility of him being more of a DH than an outfielder will cause less wear and tear and help his power?

I think the rest of the assessments are fair. Mancini should help, Gentry, Flash may be good for a few, Joseph should be good for atleast 1 this season...

He credited Edgar Martinez for a swing adjustment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I'm a bit curious by the +9 jump o Trumbo. Was there something he did last year that he improved on for this year, or do you think the possibility of him being more of a DH than an outfielder will cause less wear and tear and help his power?

I think the rest of the assessments are fair. Mancini should help, Gentry, Flash may be good for a few, Joseph should be good for atleast 1 this season...

Trumbo hit 47 last year. I am confused by these numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, weams said:

Jones

Alvarez

Mancini

Machado

Trumbo

Davis

Schoop

Castillo

Smith

I just don't know how well Mancini would do at shortstop. 

Jones CF 30

Alvarez 3B 25

Mancini DH 22

Machado SS 40

Trumbo 1B 38

Davis RF 42

Schoop 2B 28

Castillo C 20

Smith/Joey LF 20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Of course not, It was Weams list ask him.

Imagine if Davis could have stuck at third base.  He wasn't too bad there in 2014.  

He was a good enough athlete and had the arm.  Never really got a chance to hone those skills.  I think he could have been okay (seriously).  Imagine an IF of Davis (3B), Manny (SS), Schoop (2B), and Mancini or Trumbo at (1B).  The future suddenly looks less complicated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I disagree, I think Lamar has a ton of baggage that is preventing someone from going all in on him. Injuries, missed games due to illness, limited passing, heavily reliant on his wheels which will almost certainly decline sooner rather than later, not having an agent - he’s clearly stubborn ( imagine need to rework his deal to make cap room). It’s obvious there are plenty of red flags that are quite frankly more than obvious.    Believe me … I wish somebody would step up. I’m ready to move on!
    • While I don’t think Santander is a great or even good outfielder, I think some of this is a little much. The Hays/Santander switch implies that LF at Fenway is easy to play, which I don’t agree with. It certainly has less ground to cover for sure, but it’s a gimmicky spot that is a little tricky. Plus it was 36 and windy. Now with that I will say 2 things:  1. Would have rather seen Stowers get the start. 2. Definitely would have liked McKenna to be out there in the 8th.
    • I guess my question would be this: what is the level of production he would have to have to make it okay for Westburg/Ortiz to stay down? Does this production even exist? I am also assuming with this question that those 2 are producing in AAA.
    • Here is   the issues the MSA is running into with the stadium improvement financing. *As of March 13, 2023, project is cancelled. Project will rebid but no definite date yet.** https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/news/2023/03/07/baltimore-ravens-stadium-upgrades-financing.html After promising the Baltimore Ravens up to $600 million worth of upgrades to their stadium if the team resigned its lease, the Maryland Stadium Authority is now exploring how to finance those renovations amid a difficult economic environment. Chief Financial Officer David Raith told the Stadium Authority’s board on Tuesday that the agency won’t be able to finance $435 million in planned improvements to M&T Bank Stadium with only tax-exempt bonds and is seeking the OK to find a bank loan or other financing to pay for up to $200 million of the project costs. Financing updates to the Baltimore Ravens stadium primarily using tax-exempt bonds, a cheaper option, won’t work because those types of bonds have to be spent in a three-year period. If the money is not spent in three years, Raith said the authority would be at risk of being penalized by the Internal Revenue Service. “I knew there was no way we could spend $600 million in three years,” Raith told the Baltimore Business Journal after the meeting. Raith wants to split the $435 million cost into two methods of financing — $235 million in tax-exempt revenue bonds and $200 million in taxable financing. That money could be raised through a letter of credit, a taxable bond deal or a bank loan. Acquiring taxable debt will be costly as Raith predicted the $200 million in taxable financing would have an interest rate of 5.6%, compared to 3.6% for the tax-exempt bonds. He said the agency would prefer a bank loan for the $200 million because the agency would not have to pay interest until it starts using the loan funds, which could save millions of dollars a year. But Raith said he first needs to see if there are any lenders interested in ponying up the money. “I just don’t know whether there is enough commitment from the banking community for something like that,” he said. The renovations are part of a plan by the state to incentivize both the Ravens and Orioles to stay put in Baltimore. The Maryland General Assembly last year passed House Bill 896, which allowed the stadium authority to borrow $1.2 billion in bonds to pay for improvements to both stadiums. The stadium improvement funds were used as a carrot to get the teams to sign long-term leases. Once the team signed a lease, it would then get access to $600 million. The Ravens in January signed a 15-year lease extension that keeps the team at M&T Bank Stadium until 2037. The signing of the lease started a one-year period for the stadium authority to get financing in place for planned upgrades to M&T Bank Stadium. The Ravens could not be reached for comment. To get all $435 million for renovations financed as quickly as possible, the stadium authority approved a measure on Tuesday allowing Raith to start exploring how he wants to secure the $200 million in taxable borrowing. But the authority also needs the Maryland General Assembly to pass legislation that would allow dual financing for the project. House Bill 524 introduced in Annapolis would create separate financing funds for both the Ravens and Orioles project costs. The clock is ticking for Raith to secure this funding. He said a potential increase by the Federal Reserve of the federal interest rate could cost the authority and taxpayers millions more. “With rising interest rates, the [Maryland Stadium Authority] is trying to get to market as soon as possible to get the best interest rates and generate as much money as possible to ensure we can complete the projects,” Raith said. Unlike the Ravens, the Orioles have yet to sign a lease. The Orioles' lease is up at the end of 2023 and Raith said if the Orioles sign a long-term lease the stadium authority would have to repeat this process again. Raith said he was surprised that the Ravens lease agreement happened first because the team's deal still had five years left on it. “I don’t think anyone expected that the Ravens would be the first ones to the plate because the Orioles' lease was the one that really was a top priority,” Raith said
    • Someone should ask him about maybe having the highest prices for beer of any team? This is at the new market stores. 16oz beers are $10.99 for domestic and $12.49 for craft, hard, seltzers, or imported beers. 24oz beers are $14.99 for domestic and $15.75 for imports or hard seltzers. 12oz canned cocktails are $12.99.
    • I would say "stunning".... but is it, really?
    • Don't like this answer either.He is going to do Baltimore a favor and give them a gift. Don't trust him. Plus the Ravens stadium improvement money may not all come from bonds and maybe have to partially pay it off with a bank loan. As the MSA said the longer you wait on the financing, the more it will cost the taxpayers. I have heard the longer you wait and with interest rates rising the State is not sure the Orioke improvements can all be done with public funds.   The Orioles will play their first home game next Thursday, and Gov. Wes Moore and his children will throw out the first pitch. The Orioles’ current lease with the state of Maryland, its landlord, expires at the end of the year. Angelos has said that he hopes signing a long-term lease can be an “All-Star break gift,” meaning the deal would be done by early July. He didn’t provide an update on timing Thursday when asked, but said “we’re going to come through” when it comes to the lease. “There’s no question about it,” he said.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...