Jump to content

Would you bench Davis against LHP?


Brion McClanahan

Recommended Posts

Davis's career OPS is 100 points lower vs. LHP. With the Orioles roster as projected, do you think it would be a good idea to let Trumbo DH (he has more even career splits) and let Mancini play first while Davis is on the bench vs LHP? I know Davis is the better defensive infielder, but the Os will face a Red Sox team with three LHPs, a Toronto team with two, and a Yankee team with one out of shape LH starter. The Os could run out an all RH lineup and have some thunder on the bench with Davis, Kim, Smith, and maybe Alvarez off the bench in the future. The Os have been experts at juggling a roster, so could this be the year of the platoon?

Vs LHP:

Rickard LF, Gentry RF, Machado 3B, Trumbo DH, Jones CF, Schoop 2B, Hardy SS, Castillo C, Mancini 1B

Vs. RHP:

Smith RF, Jones CF, Machado 3B, Davis 1B, Trumbo DH, Schoop 2B, Hardy SS, Castillo C, Kim LF

I know this would create a problem with pitchers. The Os would still need Joseph and Flash, so that would give the Os only 11 pitchers. Something has to give, and I would think it is either Mancini or Rickard.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Occasionally.  But even if he scuffles at bat v. LHP, the glove makes him the starter most days regardless.

The first pickle for Buck will be how far can he move him down the order against the Chris Sales of the world if the April/May returns continue to deteriorate. 

The next one is hopefully another couple years off, but the deluxe pickle will be when does he get pinch hit for in late and close games vs. LOOGYs.  The first time it is going to be a mini-version of when Manny Alexander pinch ran for Cal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brion McClanahan said:

Davis's career OPS is 100 points lower vs. LHP. With the Orioles roster as projected, do you think it would be a good idea to let Trumbo DH (he has more even career splits) and let Mancini play first while Davis is on the bench vs LHP? I know Davis is the better defensive infielder, but the Os will face a Red Sox team with three LHPs, a Toronto team with two, and a Yankee team with one out of shape LH starter. The Os could run out an all RH lineup and have some thunder on the bench with Davis, Kim, Smith, and maybe Alvarez off the bench in the future. The Os have been experts at juggling a roster, so could this be the year of the platoon?

Vs LHP:

Rickard LF, Gentry RF, Machado 3B, Trumbo DH, Jones CF, Schoop 2B, Hardy SS, Castillo C, Mancini 1B

Vs. RHP:

Smith RF, Jones CF, Machado 3B, Davis 1B, Trumbo DH, Schoop 2B, Hardy SS, Castillo C, Kim LF

I know this would create a problem with pitchers. The Os would still need Joseph and Flash, so that would give the Os only 11 pitchers. Something has to give, and I would think it is either Mancini or Rickard.

Thoughts?

No I wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Worth noting that Davis' HR on Wednesday came off a tough lefty, J.A. Happ.

Bingo. They don't get much tougher than Happ. Other than Davis' HR Jones had a first row homer and that was it. 

In fact, depending on how Ubaldo's start goes tonight, we may see Mancini go down for Miley and keep getting the extra bullpen arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Bingo. They don't get much tougher than Happ. Other than Davis' HR Jones had a first row homer and that was it. 

In fact, depending on how Ubaldo's start goes tonight, we may see Mancini go down for Miley and keep getting the extra bullpen arm. 

Although that could happen, I really doubt it.  We have four guys in the pen who haven't reached the field yet.  Multiple guys with options if you have to burn through guys.  I don't believe the Rickard/Mancini/Gentry resolution happen before the 15th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2017 at 3:33 PM, Aristotelian said:

I would not have signed him for $160M...but if I did, I would not pay him that much to be a platoon player. I think it would be fine to rest him on occasion and it would make sense to do so against LHPs and give Mancini some reps.

Correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • You can’t assume he’ll win a rotation spot, but he’s valuable depth. He should have the opportunity to earn his way into the rotation but make sure to have at least 5 SP who should be better. 
    • Yep - Eflin was perfectly reasonable as a free agent prior to 2023.
    • He got 30 ABs. Does he get more if they aren’t resigned? Does he get called up sooner if they’re not here? When did he get called up again the second time? When Mateo got injured. 
    • Anyone see the Mets 9th inning last night down 2-0?  Just unbelievable.  That is the opposite of what we saw from the Orioles with their season on the line.  Incredible at-bats by Lindor and Nimmo and then a opposite field 3-run HR by another veteran Pete Alonso.  They then scored another run on a HPB, stolen base and Marte single.  The Orioles need to add a couple solid, dependable RH hitters.  They've needed this for the past two years.  If they just roll out this same position player squad next year with a couple dumpster diver additions that's just not going to cut it.  They also need a veteran leader of some sort, seems like that was lacking.  Also wondering if the LF wall is hurting this team not just on the field (clearly did in WC series) but psychologically and in terms of front-office strategy.  Maybe time to move that thing in 10 feet, especially if the offensive strategy is gonna continue to be "try and hit a HR on every pitch up and down the line-up". 
    • Yeah, Elias unloaded a ton of prospects/young players this year, tbh. Hall, Ortiz/draft pick for Burnes. Johnson and Chace for Soto (ugh) Etzel, Baumeister, and Horvath for Eflin Stowers and Norby for Rogers I get that there are injuries, but if Elias just dabbled in FA a bit more this offseason and shored up the bullpen and rotation they wouldn’t have needed to do at least 2 of those trades.  And while all of those guys except for Burnes (he’ll net a comp pick) are under control through next year (Soto, Eflin) and the year after (Rogers), I’d argue you could have used those guys in the offseason and/or for yourself if you just went the FA route.  I do think Elias gambled too much at the start of the year. With Bradish hurt back in February, that really left Burnes, Grayson, Kremer, Means, Wells, and Irvin. Well, Means had a setback and had an injury history, Wells had an injury history, and even though Suarez was a depth signing, the depth wasn’t all that great. There were plenty of options available in February to reduce the need to ever let it get to a spot to desperation sign Rogers, tbh.  
    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...