Jump to content

Orioles Acquire Miguel Castro Designate Gunkel


weams

Recommended Posts

Looking at his minor league track record, he looks like a guy with a fair bit of upside -- more than a strikeout per inning, low H/9, reasonable BB rate.    It looks like the Rockies rushed him and/or he's yet one more pitcher who couldn't succeed pitching at altitude.     Buck made some interesting comments about our player development system: "our instructors down there are the best in baseball..."  http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2017/04/orioles-acquire-miguel-castro-from-rockies-and-dfa-joe-gunkel.html

Brian Graham made a similar claim at Fanfest.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Looking at his minor league track record, he looks like a guy with a fair bit of upside -- more than a strikeout per inning, low H/9, reasonable BB rate.    It looks like the Rockies rushed him and/or he's yet one more pitcher who couldn't succeed pitching at altitude.     Buck made some interesting comments about our player development system: "our instructors down there are the best in baseball..."  http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2017/04/orioles-acquire-miguel-castro-from-rockies-and-dfa-joe-gunkel.html

Brian Graham made a similar claim at Fanfest.     

Odd that a team like the Reds wouldn't have jumped on him first.  Of course I can't speak for the state of their 40 man roster but they certainly have need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Odd that a team like the Reds wouldn't have jumped on him first.  Of course I can't speak for the state of their 40 man roster but they certainly have need.

We traded a PTBNL or cash, so we didn't just claim him for nothing.    Doesn't that mean he didn't go through waivers?   In any event, maybe our scouts liked him better than the Reds'.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

We traded a PTBNL or cash, so we didn't just claim him for nothing.    Doesn't that mean he didn't go through waivers?   In any event, maybe our scouts liked him better than the Reds'.

While I don't know figures I have always thought these transactions are for very little money in the scale of what teams spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

We traded a PTBNL or cash, so we didn't just claim him for nothing.    Doesn't that mean he didn't go through waivers?   In any event, maybe our scouts liked him better than the Reds'.

Correct. He did not. It was not a claim. It was a trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

While I don't know figures I have always thought these transactions are for very little money in the scale of what teams spend.

Probably true when a guy has to come off the team's 40-man and is likely to be claimed by another team.    My only point was if the O's offered cash, the Reds didn't get a chance to put in a waiver claim ahead of the Orioles because he was never placed on waivers.    Of course, they could have chosen to offer more money than whatever the Orioles offered.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I wonder how these types of things go down. Did Dan notice this guy and go to Colorado? Were they on the verge of taking him off their roster and called up Dan?

I was thinking the other day after the last guy that teams must call up Dan before they do anything else because they know he loves to make these kinds of deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Castro is currently on his third option year.   He can go up and down has much as they want this year.  However he has to make the O's next spring or be put through waivers. 

And if he doesn't, we put him on waivers, no harm, no foul, nothing much lost. If Dan only hits on one out of a dozen of these type of signings, it still makes a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I wonder how these types of things go down. Did Dan notice this guy and go to Colorado? Were they on the verge of taking him off their roster and called up Dan?

He was DFA last week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • PaulFolk changed the title to Orioles Acquire Miguel Castro Designate Gunkel

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...