Jump to content

Orioles Acquire Miguel Castro Designate Gunkel


weams

Recommended Posts

o

 

MIGUEL ANGEL CASTRO )))))))) (vs. RANGERS, 7/20)

 

Immediately following a 3-run inning by the Orioles' offense to get the team back within striking range at 5-4, Castro came in and shut the Rangers down in the top of the 6th. 

3 up, 3 down, on only 8 Pitches (6 Strikes, 2 Balls.)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, wildbillhiccup said:

Seriously people, please stop resurrecting these threads from 3 months ago. There are PLENTY of other current threads to discuss trade possibilities and current news.

We only discuss him when he pitches. ? Usually the minute he exits is when the thread is bumped, it doesn't get more current than that. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

First, I didn't know he was 6'7. I thought he was more like a Pedro Strop.He's an imposing presence and throws really hard. The question is, is he a starter?

One things for sure, he's a good person.

Castro spent his $43,000 signing bonus on a prostate operation for his father, as well as a surgery to remove his mother's fibrous tumor.

Great story. I'm surprised the Thorne hasn't mentioned that during a game. Maybe they don't know?

DD, McDowell, Mills and the people in AA should get some credit here. 

I keep saying the but not in this thread. Castro is only a few months older than Tanner Scott. Tanner Scott made the futures game. Both are 22. From my non expert opinion, I like what I've seen of Castro more. Better command. Same Velocity. Better slider. Has a change up for a 3rd pitch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the O's have done a good job with Castro.    His delivery seems more under control and over the top than when I first saw him.    I see no reason why he shouldn't be an excellent bullpen piece.     Can he be a starter?    I have no idea.     But I wouldn't mind giving him a try.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Great story. I'm surprised the Thorne hasn't mentioned that during a game. Maybe they don't know?

DD, McDowell, Mills and the people in AA should get some credit here. 

I keep saying the but not in this thread. Castro is only a few months older than Tanner Scott. Tanner Scott made the futures game. Both are 22. From my non expert opinion, I like what I've seen of Castro more. Better command. Same Velocity. Better slider. Has a change up for a 3rd pitch. 

Scott being able to bring it from the left side is what I think makes most evaluators pop. Much less common. 

Castro was converted to a reliever pretty early in his minor league career. I don't know if this was due to performance or if they wanted him to move faster. He's still very young. Am curious if he could stretch out over the offseason and give it a run in Bowie next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

MIGUEL ANGEL CASTRO )))))))) (vs. DEVIL RAYS, 7/25)

 

Castro came in and held the fort 1.67 innings to keep the Orioles in the game, with an assist from Donnie Scott Hart.

Castro's ERA for the season is a solid 2.70, and his WHIP is an equally solid 1.087.

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's striking out 4 batters per 9 IP.

4.  

How does someone with an "easy 99" only strikeout 12 batters in 27 innings?  That doesn't bode well for future results.  SSS and all, but we're already annointing him an excellent bullpen piece?  Really?  He's being way overrated in this thread.  It's weird to me that some choose to ignore strikeouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2017 at 10:27 PM, NedFromYork said:

Resurrecting threads is one of the great things about this message board and group.

And I think the aim is to keep the discussions organized instead of multiple threads about the same topic / player. I see no problem with this method. Maybe crossing out / editing the Gunkel part of the topic line would help, but other than that, fine.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NashLumber said:

And I think the aim is to keep the discussions organized instead of multiple threads about the same topic / player. I see no problem with this method. Maybe crossing out / editing the Gunkel part of the topic line would help, but other than that, fine.

 I for one have never understood the disdain with bumped threads. If it really does bother you, maybe just look at the date of the OP?

 

 As Art said the lack of strikeouts is concerning, but I am glad to see he keeps getting the job done. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...